Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Legit West | Вердикты

Channel

Legit West | Вердикты

@legitwestvrd

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

25subscribers

+4 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002399244865
TypeChannel
Username@legitwestvrd
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/legitwestvrd

Growth

2125238 August 2026 — 21 subscribers11 August 2026 — 21 subscribers24 August 2026 — 22 subscribers31 August 2026 — 24 subscribers9 September 2026 — 25 subscribers8 August 20269 September 2026
5 measurements spanning 32 days, net +4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 20–26 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Sept 2026, 12:1625+1
31 Aug 2026, 18:1324+2
24 Aug 2026, 04:3622+1
11 Aug 2026, 15:0321no change
8 Aug 2026, 14:3221first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 21 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 22 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Recent posts

22 Jul 2026, 14:35 UTC14 viewsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Giuseppe Zanotti shoes #107 ——— Size: 45 Verdict: fake🔴 Проверка выполнена 20.04.2026 командой Legit West менеджер канала

22 Jul 2026, 14:35 UTC16 viewsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Giuseppe Zanotti shoes #106 ——— Size: 45 Verdict: real🟢 Проверка выполнена 14.04.2026 командой Legit West менеджер канала

22 Jul 2026, 14:35 UTC15 viewsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Zara jeans #105 ——— Size: 44 Verdict: real🟢 Проверка выполнена 13.03.2026 командой Legit West менеджер канала

22 Jul 2026, 14:35 UTC13 viewsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Salvatore Ferragamo #104 ——— Size: 120 Verdict: fake🔴 Проверка выполнена 06.03.2026 командой Legit West менеджер канала

22 Jul 2026, 14:35 UTC14 viewsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Balenciaga Defender #103 ——— Size: 40 Verdict: fake🔴 Проверка выполнена 27.04.2026 командой Legit West менеджер канала

22 Jul 2026, 14:35 UTC14 viewsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Blumarine Bag #102 ——— Size: o/s Verdict: real🟢 Проверка выполнена 27.04.2026 командой Legit West менеджер канала

26 May 2026, 16:23 UTC63 viewsread 11 August 2026

Спасибо большое, все четко проверил @legitwest1

22 May 2026, 06:39 UTC71 viewsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Balenciaga Bag #101 ——— Size: o/s Verdict: fake🔴 менеджер канал

21 May 2026, 23:40 UTC70 viewsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Maison Margiela Replica #100 ——— Size: 43 Verdict: real🟢 Проверка выполнена 20.05.2026 командой Legit West менеджер канала

21 May 2026, 23:40 UTC56 viewsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Balenciaga track1 #99 ——— Size: 42 Verdict: fake🔴 менеджер канал

21 May 2026, 23:39 UTC53 viewsread 11 August 2026
Photo

True religion jeans #98 ——— Size: 29 Verdict: real🟢 менеджер канал

21 May 2026, 23:39 UTC49 viewsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Adidas Samba #97 ——— Size: 46 Verdict: real🟢 менеджер канал

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @legitwestvrd. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Legit West | Вердикты” (@legitwestvrd), 25 subscribers as measured 9 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/legitwestvrd.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.