Channel
@leka_engineer_channel
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
1,728subscribers
-6 since we began measuring on 19 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001320419126 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @leka_engineer_channel |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 19 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/leka_engineer_channel |
Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 17 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 87% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Sept 2026, 17:19 | 1,728 | -2 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 05:56 | 1,730 | -3 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 09:13 | 1,733 | -2 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 10:57 | 1,735 | +1 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 14:32 | 1,734 | +1 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 12:17 | 1,733 | -1 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 18:15 | 1,734 | no change |
| 19 Aug 2026, 18:01 | 1,734 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 17 December 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
183 reactions across 19 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ⚡ | 63 | 34.4% | |
| 👍 | 41 | 22.4% | |
| 🔥 | 39 | 21.3% | |
| ❤ | 32 | 17.5% | |
| 🤔 | 3 | 1.64% | |
| 🤩 | 2 | 1.09% | |
| 👌 | 1 | 0.546% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 0.546% | |
| 🤯 | 1 | 0.546% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 183 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 17 December 2025 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🇬🇧 #youtube video by Mini-Circuits. In the datasheet the amplifier is presented without any additional circuitry. It is mentioned only RF OUT+Vdd on the scheme - it means that you should use coaxial bias-tee device or design the Vdd circuit yourself. In this video the circuit for 700-800 MHz is shown. I always recommend checking ALL the resources provided by the manufacturer. There can be some hints. #amplifier How…
🔥5👍3⚡1
🇬🇧International Journal of Metrology and Quality Engineering Link was found by my russian collegue&blogger, so the text is in Russian, but the Journal is in English. https://t.me/main_metrologist/337
⚡12❤10
🇬🇧 In general I do not recommend Altium website as a resource for RFµwave knowledge, but this short article provide relevant equation and useful calculators. They are very simple so no room for a mistake. How did they write the article on patch antennas without single photo of one??? Why did they put a PCB with a mixer as a cover? Why there is a BT antenna in the end of the article? Microstrip Patch Antenna Ca…
⚡4❤4🤯1
🇬🇧 Mating Microwave connectors (Southwest Microwave)
⚡6👍5🔥4
🇬🇧 Understanding Torque Wrenches video (Rohde&Schwarz)
⚡6❤2👍1
And mismatch losses table by Marki Microwave
🔥9⚡1👌1👍1👏1
🇬🇧 #onlinecalculator for mismatch losses https://www.keysight.com/used/md/en/knowledge/calculators/vswr-return-loss-calculator
⚡2👍2
🇬🇧 PDF file about high speed PCBs design. Posted in a Ru speaking telegram channel but the file itself is in English. Controlled impedance design guide by Sierra Circuits.
❤5⚡1👍1🔥1🤩1
🇷🇺 Статья про проектирование КПП, идея похожа на КПП Таир, про которые я писала статью осенью, - авторы взяли герметичную розетку и спроектировали корпус для крепления на плату. Проектирование СВЧ коаксиально-микрополосковых переходов на базе гермовводов НПФ «Микран»
⚡3🤔3❤1
And Applying Error Correction to Vector Network Analyzer Measurements
⚡3❤2🔥1
🇬🇧 Today's topic is calibration. In my latest post in Instagram I mentioned that calibration needs to be performed every time. I've heard that some engineers neglect this rule but here are some materials that will explain why calibration is a must. Getting Started with Vector Network Analyzers (VNAs)
⚡7
🇬🇧 Wrong (Not applicable in general) information in Mini-Circuits blog Applying Proper Torque to Microwave Connectors (they have a *note that these values are recommendations for their products). I post a lot from their blog, and they write mostly nice articles. But not this one unfortunately. Please perceive my post as a reminder to check everything twice. Right torque values can be found on Keysight or R&S appnote…
⚡3
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @leka_engineer_channel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Leka_engineer recommends” (@leka_engineer_channel), 1,728 subscribers as measured 14 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/leka_engineer_channel.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.