Channel
@lel_mst
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
253subscribers
+5 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001216896051 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @lel_mst |
| Created | 5 March 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 4 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 4 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/lel_mst |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 4 Sept 2026, 07:37 | 253 | +2 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 19:58 | 251 | -2 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 12:57 | 253 | +5 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:28 | 248 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 03:01 | 248 | first reading |
15 posts held, back to 14 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
278 reactions across 15 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 99 | 35.6% | |
| ❤🔥 | 45 | 16.2% | |
| 🤣 | 30 | 10.8% | |
| 🔥 | 28 | 10.1% | |
| 🍓 | 21 | 7.55% | |
| 😨 | 20 | 7.19% | |
| 🥰 | 17 | 6.12% | |
| 💔 | 12 | 4.32% | |
| 💘 | 3 | 1.08% | |
| 😁 | 3 | 1.08% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 278 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 14 July 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
#держу_в_курсе Дамы, я дописала 18 главу #шп – всего‐то нужно было выспаться и перетащить документ с компа на телефон. Глава относительно остальных довольно объёмная, там 51к знаков, но есть одно НО: в этой главе без феминистского контекста вам будет тяжко. Удачи. Зато я простебала моих противниц 🥰 Там буквально был пересказ моего срача в коммах какого‐то канала, в результате которого меня забанили ахаха))) Госпожа …
❤🔥6😁3
Набросала одну из героинь #дмис. Царевна, любимая мамкина дочь и олицетворение фразы "дурная голова ногам покоя не даёт". Зовут её Ариадна, и на момент начала сюжета она мертва. #картиночная ((°))
❤22🍓2😨2💘1
#время_клоунизма Вайб 18 главы #шп такой типа:
🤣10😨4❤3🍓1
Заодно наконец покажу начитку стиха, а то она уже месяц лежит пылится. Сам стих можно прочитать здесь. #буквы_в_звуки ((°))
❤8🍓1💘1😨1
[ 10.06.26 – 11.06.26 ] посмотрите на лилии, как они растут: не трудятся, не прядут; но говорю вам, что и соломон во всей славе своей не одевался так, как всякая из них. [ евангелие от луки, 12:27 ] #картиночная ((°))
❤11🍓1🔥1🥰1😨1
[ 9.05.26 ] > #шп #картиночная ((°))
🥰13❤4🔥3🍓1😨1
Там у девчат ответы на вопросы ёмкие и короткие, тем временем мои ответы: (И это я кучу всего сократила + у меня не хватило времени дописать то, что я не домоноложила)
🤣12😨2🍓1
🤩🤩🤩🤩 🤩 🤩🤩🤩🤩 ☺️️от и закончилась работа над проектом «Тысяча и одна поэтесса» ! Нашей редакторкой Зорькой было опрошено семь известных поэтесс из канала Poetry by women и проанализировано их творчество. Расширенная версия содержится в вордовском документе. ☺️п🥬с🥬к у🥬а🥬т🥬и🥬 : Анна Бирюзовская 🤩 Линдочка ЯСВ 🤩 с. ти́шина 🤩 Лилия С. 🤩 А. Мышъ 🤩 Апрельская А. Е. 🤩 Леля Мстиславских 🤩 ☺️асширенную версию можно …
❤7🔥5🍓1😨1
Причины, почему Теодор без одежды:
🤣8❤3🍓1😨1
[ даже не буду себя заставлять вспоминать даты, когда я это нарисовала. ] #картиночная #дмис ((°))
❤13🥰3🍓1😨1
《 Белое море отличалось от Чёрного точно так же, как отличались цвета, в честь которых они названы. Если Чёрное море – тёплое, лазурно-синее и глубокое, с растянутыми песчано-галечными пляжами, то Белое – суровое и неприветливое, ледяное и свинцовое, изнизанное множеством каменистых островков, никогда не скрывающихся под водой, даже во время накатывающих приливов. А стоило туману затянуть его, так оно и вовсе сливало…
🔥11🍓5❤3❤🔥1😨1
ВОДА Вода, Эта беснующаяся, чёрно‐синяя пучина. Вода, Она затягивает в свои глубины, Туда, Где давятся остатками рыболовных снастей Саблезубые киты. Туда, Куда откашливают сгустки дурных вестей. Беда. Тогда возлагают цветы На тёплые холмики могил. Беда – Там, где вода, где чёрная пустота, Где вместо кислорода – ил. [ 16.07.26 ] Р.S. пыталась как‐то осмыслить свой ужас перед водой.. #текстодельня ((°))
💔12❤5😨2❤🔥1🍓1🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @lel_mst. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@lel_mst named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Леля Мстиславских” (@lel_mst), 253 subscribers as measured 4 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lel_mst.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.