(总入口) https://t.me/shmdgmd (主榜单和评价) https://t.me/moduguangmingding2 (镜像榜单) https://t.me/moduguangmingding1

Channel
辣可可🌶️@小窝
@lemi66601
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
455subscribers
+220 since we began measuring on 9 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1004364838673 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @lemi66601 |
| Created | Between 1 June 2026 and 31 August 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/lemi66601 |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Sept 2026, 19:21 | 455 | +220 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 14:22 | 235 | first reading |
Engagement
15 posts held, back to 5 September 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 105.0%
- avg views ÷ 455 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 478
- 14 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.518%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 15
- of 15 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 7 of 14 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 15 (5 September 2026 – 9 September 2026) |
| Views total | 6,686 |
| Reactions total | 20 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 9 Sept 2026, 14:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
20 reactions across 6 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 70.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 14 | 70.0% | |
| 🤩 | 6 | 30.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 20 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 5 September 2026 to 9 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
https://t.me/moduguangmingding2/26718?single
本人比验证视频好看、给个见面的机会,会有个难忘的回忆😍😍
🤩6
开课咯、有🈳😍
👍👍👍【艺术展览会福利群】⬇️ 免费拿5折6折7折优惠 和抽奖 白嫖 现金红包🧧福利 本群专属手势认证高质量老师 上海艺术展览会福利群: https://t.me/+nFnE0wANtSRkMjEx 点击进去备用群 上海艺术展览会总榜单:https://t.me/+2i_egsiBxNFlNmJh 上海艺术展览会人气推荐榜 https://t.me/+vOj1VuT48NE3MDc1 上海艺术展览会中转平台 https://t.me/+-sIwH2NalFw2MzEy 展览会老师广告群 @shanghaiyishu 个人推荐频道88🧧 📡 上榜管理:@yishuja_bot 📡 管理秘书:@Yishujia798_bot
【沪杭精选报告】: https://t.me/hhlsml 【艺名】: #辣可可 【价格】: 2600p 【位置】: #普陀 【联系方式】: @lakk003 【身材样貌】: 颜值很高,身材好高挑,天然胸,胸很大,屁股大 【服务过程】: 刚下海的新人,真人比验证视频好看多了,第一眼看到老师的时候和预期差了点,可能是灯光问题,近看的时候是真好看,都有想加p的冲动,很瘦,大眼睛,精致的妆容,爱笑,皮肤白光滑水嫩,说话温柔好听,很有气质,情商高,聊天舒服,态度诚恳,不催课,服务态度很好,敬业,帮擦干身体,胸摸着软软的,大蟒蛇,口活很好,69狂舔,下面很紧,塞满的感觉,水多,屌感很好,做爱反馈真实,叫床声不大,各种姿势配合,抓着屁股后入,女上,男上,传教士,后入,该说不说,是真的干得很爽,下次见
❤1
辣可可@lakk003 26p 颜值:8.1 身材 8.0 体验 8.0 现在上海小圈 20-30 这个价位段,处境相当微妙。好的如 20 出头的温、02,各具特色;兔、桐、林则凭借过硬的硬件与极佳的态度,让人纷至沓来。至于 30 档,那两位“天坑”甚至吓得连夜删人的狗推都避之不及;此外,25 档的刘恩恩与温菲儿也是大雷。 一言以蔽之,这个价位段不仅是雷,而且是爆雷频发。 驾照,虽然经过靠谱狼友推荐,我早已抱定趟雷的心态,但课前的验证视频确实观感平平——网红脸、甚至有些显老。然而当真人现身,身着一袭湖蓝色连衣裙配高跟鞋,暖白皮,180+ 的气场随体态拉开的瞬间,高下立判。高个子的压迫感是天生的,正如王楚然、古力娜扎同框,天然能碾压鞠婧祎。身形纤瘦,大眼睛、高鼻梁,面部立体度极高,属于娜扎这一类浓郁明艳的类型。我笑称她不像成都人,她自述是个子高吗,此前在广州做车展模特,算是不久前刚下海的新人。 她礼貌中带着几分无措,比如递水…
❤7
【验证留名】:shdufu 【验证老师】: 辣可可 【验证时间】:9月7日 【修车水费】:2600P 【服务内容】:鸳鸯浴 舌吻 课表流程有的都有 【年龄身高】:23,175 【颜值身材】:丰满大胸 【机车行为】:不机车 【优点缺点】:耐心满满女友感 【推荐程度】:个人认为达到大圈5 【过程描述】:星级酒店,-1楼接,低风险区,安全程度高,妹妹昨天下午3点刚到上海,我是下午四点到,妹妹去年毕业,兼职过车展模特,身材修长,面容精致,态度很热情,上楼后,聊了会天,妹妹亲自陪浴,还拿出刚购买的情趣内衣让我挑选,亲吻管饱,服务的时候有点羞涩,不是非常熟练,但很认真,表情很自然,有女友的感觉。想找个气质好,热情的妹妹推荐去,不输大圈,个人一家之言,仅供参考。
❤1
开课咯、有🈳
睡醒咯😊
陆续会拍露脸照片视频、
❤4
到上海啦、可外出
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @lemi66601. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“辣可可🌶️@小窝” (@lemi66601), 455 subscribers as measured 11 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lemi66601.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.