Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 72% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
25 measurements spanning 91 days, net -79. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,222–6,325 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 25
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
5 Nov 2026, 21:28
6,234
-1
2 Nov 2026, 12:46
6,235
-6
30 Oct 2026, 20:50
6,241
-11
27 Oct 2026, 22:05
6,252
-9
24 Oct 2026, 23:59
6,261
+9
22 Oct 2026, 09:28
6,252
-1
19 Oct 2026, 03:26
6,253
-1
15 Oct 2026, 18:09
6,254
-6
12 Oct 2026, 12:36
6,260
-7
5 Oct 2026, 14:37
6,267
+4
28 Sept 2026, 06:21
6,263
-9
16 Sept 2026, 04:40
6,272
-9
12 Sept 2026, 21:57
6,281
-3
8 Sept 2026, 17:39
6,284
-11
3 Sept 2026, 04:17
6,295
+1
28 Aug 2026, 07:03
6,294
+2
25 Aug 2026, 15:46
6,292
-10
22 Aug 2026, 19:28
6,302
-2
19 Aug 2026, 17:33
6,304
-1
16 Aug 2026, 15:25
6,305
first reading
Engagement
46 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 14 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
4.11%
avg views ÷ 6,234 subscribers
Avg views / post
256
21 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.78%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
21
of 46 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 November 2026
Posts held
46 (4 August 2026 – 6 November 2026)
Views total
5,380
Reactions total
96
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
6 Nov 2026, 16:03 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈5,780
Videos
≈305
Links
≈6,010
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
1m 12s
Average length
12s
Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
211 reactions across 43 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
66
31.3%
👍
41
19.4%
👏
33
15.6%
😁
19
9.00%
🔥
17
8.06%
🤩
15
7.11%
😱
7
3.32%
😢
6
2.84%
🤔
6
2.84%
👎
1
0.474%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 43 of the 46 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 211 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 46 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 6 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 21 posts held from the last 30 days (4.76%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
#ПлейсДайджест
🗞️ В Минтрансе обсуждают поправки к ПДД: курьерам могут запретить ездить на электровелосипедах по тротуарам, а владельцев мощных средств индивидуальной мобильности обяжут предъявлять права категории М. По оценкам экспертов, это приведет к росту издержек служб доставки, увеличению сроков и себестоимости одной отправки: часть курьеров придется пересаживать на автомобили, а многим — оформлять права, так …
[Собственнику] [Управляющему] #Сотрудники #Гости
Самый долгий момент в обслуживании — чаще всего тот, когда официант уже принял заказ, но он еще не попал на кухню 🥹
Официант записывает заказ, идет к кассе, вносит заказ в систему, и только в этот момент заказ отправляется на кухню ➡️
А если в это время гость что-то передумал, добавил или попросил убрать — цепочка действий еще и удлиняется 🥺
При полной посадке эти …
#ПлейсДайджест
🗞️ По данным Infoline, к сентябрю 2026 года число заведений топ‑10 сетей кофеен и формата Coffee Grab&Go сократилось на 7% (на 244 точки) относительно начала года — рынок переходит к перераспределению и повышению операционной эффективности. При этом отдельные игроки, вроде «Дринкита», активно расширяются: сеть открыла 94 заведения и планирует довести их число до 300 до конца года. Эксперты прогнозирую…
[Собственнику] #Управление #Сотрудники
«На точке все нормально» — это не отчет ‼️
Особенно если у вас 5, 10 или 20 ресторанов 💯
Если управляющий говорит, что все хорошо, старший смены это подтверждает, а потом вы приезжаете в ресторан и внезапно обнаруживаете нарушение регламентов: грязные зоны, неправильное хранение и просроченные продукты, то возникает вопрос: а как это вообще контролировали? 🥺
Цифровой контрол…
[Собственнику] #Учет
Расходы, расходы, расходы… 😵
Конечно, в наше время любой бизнес хочет их сократить, но правильно ли начинать с того, чтобы просто урезать их? 🤔
На этот вопрос в сегодняшнем материале ответила наша коллега Наталья Пахмутова, эксперт по увеличению прибыли 📈
#ПлейсДайджест
🗞️ К сентябрю 2026 года просроченная задолженность общепита перед банками достигла 24,3 млрд рублей — это максимум с 2018 года и на 27% больше, чем годом ранее. Из‐за дорогих кредитов, роста издержек и снижения спроса рестораны сокращают порции и пересматривают меню, но компенсировать расходы полностью не удается. На этом фоне за девять месяцев 2026 года закрылись 28 000 компаний и ИП — на 15% больше,…
Коллеги, через 15 минут начинаем вебинар «Руководители смотрят на наличку: как цифры становятся инструментом манипуляции» с Аленой Овчинниковой 🎙️
Разберем, как распознавать манипуляции в управленческих отчетах, видеть реальные показатели ресторана и принимать решения на основе цифр, а не красивых презентаций 😎
Подключиться к вебинару ⬅️
Регистрация для Беларуси и Казахстана ⬅️
[Собственнику] [Маркетологу] #Маркетинг
В прошлом посте наш друг Юлия Петрова, маркетолог и эксперт в HoReCa, пообещала рассказать о так называемом «тихом сервисе», который повышает лояльность гостя к бренду, а не к выгодным предложениям 🙏
В сегодняшнем материале Юлии вы узнаете, как это работает, и почему вовсе отказываться от скидок тоже необязательно ✅
Скидку сделали. Чек отменили. Возврат оформили. А руководитель об этом даже не знает 👀
В ресторане каждый день проходят десятки, а иногда и сотни операций. Сотрудники открывают смены, проводят продажи, применяют скидки, оформляют возвраты. И пока все работает, кажется, что ситуация под контролем 😎
Но попробуйте ответить: кто вчера отменил чек? Почему сделали возврат? У кого вообще есть право проводить такие операци…
#ПлейсДайджест
🗞 Крупные партнеры Rostic’s выкупают рестораны у небольших франчайзи: компания «Рестораны быстрого питания» приобрела бизнес калужского франчайзи, а в перспективе может купить еще несколько точек в Калужской и Брянской областях — общая стоимость сделки оценивается примерно в 260 млн рублей. Эксперты связывают такую тенденцию с тем, что небольшим операторам все сложнее сохранять доходность, а крупные и…
❤2👍1🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 46 posts we hold for @lemmagroup. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
у ваших официантов есть регламент по продажам, а не каждый продает как умеет60%
ваши сотрудники не боятся рекомендовать гостям допы80%
вы постоянно измеряете качество допродаж в цифрах и следите за выполнением стандартов20%
вы проводите регулярные тренинги по допродажам20%
вы уверены, что гости не уходят без позиций, которые могли бы заказать60%
рост среднего чека у вас зависит от выстроенной системы, а не от нескольких сильных официантов20%
The shares total 260%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 46 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 6 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Нетмонет @netmonet_co · 194,121 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 28 September 2026
Стойкий Ресторатор @the_restorator · 19,994 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 28 September 2026
Георгий Ривера @riverapeople · 33,401 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 9 September 2026
Zarkov Live @BorisZarkovTM · 37,300 Telegram ranks this channel #82 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 1 September 2026
This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“лемма.плейс для ресторанов” (@lemmagroup), 6,234 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lemmagroup.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.