Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Words are hard 🌚

Channel

Words are hard 🌚

@lemniscactus

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

210subscribers

-2 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001673394653
TypeChannel
Username@lemniscactus
Created25 July 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 September 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/lemniscactus

Growth

209212210.59 August 2026 — 212 subscribers9 August 2026 — 212 subscribers17 August 2026 — 211 subscribers25 August 2026 — 210 subscribers1 September 2026 — 209 subscribers11 September 2026 — 210 subscribers2109 August 202611 September 2026
6 measurements spanning 33 days, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 209–212 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Sept 2026, 06:36210+1
1 Sept 2026, 18:46209-1
25 Aug 2026, 05:43210-1
17 Aug 2026, 11:56211-1
9 Aug 2026, 01:00212no change
9 Aug 2026, 00:47212first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 20 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
41s
Average length
21s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

307 reactions across 18 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
10835.2%
😁5417.6%
🥰309.77%
🐳278.79%
🤬227.17%
👀144.56%
😢134.23%
🌚82.61%
🍓72.28%
🤡72.28%
💅51.63%
🔥41.30%
❤‍🔥30.977%
🤝30.977%
💔10.326%
🤯10.326%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 307 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 20 July 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

8 Aug 2026, 13:50 UTC83 views9 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Мой тревел контент для друзей би лайк 🤩

5🔥4

5 Aug 2026, 23:12 UTC125 views21 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Но больше всего меня волнует вопрос, про пропихивание в финал)))) Кому надо, что надо...

👀13😁8

5 Aug 2026, 21:53 UTC131 views18 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Годы идут, а увлекательные тейки про судей, критерии и "женское проще мужского" не меняются 🌟

😢108

2 Aug 2026, 11:35 UTC306 views23 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

#трудовыебудни

😁166❤‍🔥1

1 Aug 2026, 15:38 UTC256 views12 reactionsread 9 August 2026

20 сентября у нас намечается баттл севентин и тизов, судя по программе спешла и финала 🕺

😁74👀1

1 Aug 2026, 11:13 UTC325 views23 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Любимое из заявок)) На самом деле, там вообще очень много крутых идей, хочется делиться ими, ноооо спойлеры спойлеры. И среди не прошедших заявок тоже множество номеров хотелось бы посмотреть на большой сцене. Нам прислали кучу потрясающих текстов, это было безумно интересно читать❤️ К сожалению, нашлись и команды, чьи задумки совсем не отвечали теме спешла, но их было меньшинство.

🥰17💅32😁1

1 Aug 2026, 08:57 UTC149 views11 reactionsread 9 August 2026

за то, как долго я разгребаю заявки дружно скажем спасибо людям, которые в списке команды пишут всё прямо как в посте Имя, потом отчество, потом фамилия, серьезно? В половине состава, а почему остальные нормально?

5🐳3❤‍🔥1🤯1😢1

29 Jul 2026, 17:28 UTC169 views19 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Поддержка, которую мы заслужили 💅💅💅 Ауф.

18🥰1

28 Jul 2026, 19:48 UTC207 views12 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Все заявки - это ппц волнительно, но заявки в спешл финала - это прям ух. Очень жду, но одновременно очень нервничаю❤️

12

27 Jul 2026, 16:21 UTC204 views22 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Все мои квитанции за комнату в Питере приходят в лк сбера, и я их оттуда оплачиваю, потому что сраный сайт сраного ЕИРЦ не открывается за пределами РФ ни с впн, ни без - вообще никак. Но смс они при этом всё равно присылают, это у них как-то получается. Например о том, что передали в суд задолженность в полторы, сука, тысячи, которая была просрочена меньше чем на месяц и уже оплачена. А знаете что? Послать им мейл не

🤬22

26 Jul 2026, 22:36 UTC218 views19 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Мне очень надо 😐

🐳9😁5🤝3💅2

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @lemniscactus. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Words are hard 🌚” (@lemniscactus), 210 subscribers as measured 11 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lemniscactus.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.