Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Лена Борисюк🦋МЕЛОДИЯ ДУШИ

Channel

Лена Борисюк🦋МЕЛОДИЯ ДУШИ

@lena_borysiuk

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

1,886subscribers

-13 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001370209724
TypeChannel
Username@lena_borysiuk
Created15 September 2019measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 September 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held14
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/lena_borysiuk

Topic

Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 16 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 94% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

1,8791,9001,889.57 August 2026 — 1,899 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,900 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,896 subscribers13 August 2026 — 1,897 subscribers16 August 2026 — 1,890 subscribers20 August 2026 — 1,888 subscribers23 August 2026 — 1,886 subscribers27 August 2026 — 1,884 subscribers2 September 2026 — 1,882 subscribers6 September 2026 — 1,879 subscribers6 September 2026 — 1,879 subscribers11 September 2026 — 1,881 subscribers14 September 2026 — 1,879 subscribers18 September 2026 — 1,886 subscribers1,8867 August 202618 September 2026
14 measurements spanning 43 days, net -13. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,876–1,903 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 20:381,886+7
14 Sept 2026, 18:391,879-2
11 Sept 2026, 04:421,881+2
6 Sept 2026, 02:221,879no change
6 Sept 2026, 00:221,879-3
2 Sept 2026, 02:481,882-2
27 Aug 2026, 02:151,884-2
23 Aug 2026, 22:351,886-2
20 Aug 2026, 04:051,888-2
16 Aug 2026, 20:251,890-7
13 Aug 2026, 11:241,897+1
10 Aug 2026, 20:411,896-4
7 Aug 2026, 09:541,900+1
7 Aug 2026, 02:011,899first reading

Engagement

8 posts held, back to 25 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
27.8%
avg views ÷ 1,886 subscribers
Avg views / post
523
8 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.87%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
8
of 8 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 September 2026
Posts held8 (25 August 20264 September 2026)
Views total4,187
Reactions total162
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Sept 2026, 02:22 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
15s
Average length
15s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

162 reactions across 8 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
5030.9%
💯3018.5%
😁1811.1%
🙈138.02%
🎉116.79%
👍116.79%
😭84.94%
❤‍🔥53.09%
🎅53.09%
🦄42.47%
🙊21.23%
🌚10.617%
🎄10.617%
🔥10.617%
😍10.617%
😱10.617%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 162 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 25 August 2026 to 4 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

4 Sept 2026, 08:00 UTC384 views17 reactionsread 6 September 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

14❤‍🔥3

4 Sept 2026, 08:00 UTC399 views29 reactionsread 6 September 2026
Photo

Привет мои 43 годика🤣 летоисчесление это конечно круто, но совершенно не чувствую себя на эту цифру. И если честно, меня вообще не заморачивает, что там в паспорте каждый год меняется🤣🤣 Душа не имеет возраста, а тело лишь временный скафандр👌🏼о котором мне очень приятно заботиться и взращивать в нем энергию, живость и бодрость ❤️

16🎉11❤‍🔥2

1 Sept 2026, 18:18 UTC427 views7 reactionsread 6 September 2026
Video

Девочки, ну не зря рожали ведь🤣🤣применять только мамам чьи дети еще в подгузниках🤣🤣

😁7

1 Sept 2026, 08:53 UTC582 views5 reactionsread 6 September 2026

https://youtu.be/BAZ4A1CtYmU?si=bQnewg0qOho0ul10 Смотрела на днях Очень отозвались ее слова

3😁2

31 Aug 2026, 11:20 UTC621 views8 reactionsread 6 September 2026
Voice message

Размышления касательно публикации выше

👍4🎅3🎄1

31 Aug 2026, 05:36 UTC364 views35 reactionsread 6 September 2026
Forwarded from @guraantonPhoto

2026-2027 год, максимально правдивые. Нам ещё предстоит во многом разобраться Про Мать Терезу… “45 лет мир называл её живой святой. Мать Тереза. Нобелевская премия мира. Благословлённая тремя Папами. Почитаемая миллиардами людей. Она управляла крупнейшей в истории сетью торговли детьми. И Ватикан был в курсе. ОБЕСПЕЧЕНИЕ В КАЛКУТТЕ С 1962 по 1997 год Миссионерки милосердия Терезы обработали более 3 миллионов сир

🙈13😭8👍7😁32🙊2

31 Aug 2026, 05:36 UTC460 views2 reactionsread 6 September 2026

Когда всю юность слышала о ней лишь восхваляющие оды и даже мысли не допускала, что может скрываться за созданным образом🤦🏽‍♀️🤦🏽‍♀️🤦🏽‍♀️🤦🏽‍♀️🤦🏽‍♀️👇🏻👇🏻

😁2

25 Aug 2026, 05:04 UTC950 views59 reactionsread 6 September 2026
Photo

Что скажете ?

💯3015🦄4😁4🎅2🌚1🔥1😍1

Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @lena_borysiuk. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Остап Стахів
@ostapstakhiv · 24,537
Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 15 September 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Лена Борисюк🦋МЕЛОДИЯ ДУШИ” (@lena_borysiuk), 1,886 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lena_borysiuk.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.