Привет, я Леоша! (LeonS)
Это канал с моими рисунками! 🌸✨
ИНФО ПОСТ: https://t.me/leosha7/4022
Для связи: @LeonS_7
АРТЫ: https://t.me/leosha_art
Анонимка: @Leosha7Bot
Created
26 February 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
Art & design — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 56% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
59 measurements spanning 92 days, net -64. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 22,690–23,057 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 59
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
6 Nov 2026, 08:35
22,951
+16
4 Nov 2026, 06:39
22,935
+29
3 Nov 2026, 06:19
22,906
+9
2 Nov 2026, 05:28
22,897
+70
1 Nov 2026, 02:46
22,827
-7
31 Oct 2026, 04:07
22,834
-10
30 Oct 2026, 00:55
22,844
-18
28 Oct 2026, 23:06
22,862
-5
27 Oct 2026, 22:39
22,867
+9
27 Oct 2026, 00:08
22,858
+14
25 Oct 2026, 21:11
22,844
-36
24 Oct 2026, 23:45
22,880
+16
23 Oct 2026, 22:29
22,864
+14
22 Oct 2026, 21:08
22,850
-1
21 Oct 2026, 20:00
22,851
+3
20 Oct 2026, 15:17
22,848
-1
19 Oct 2026, 16:46
22,849
+33
18 Oct 2026, 18:59
22,816
+81
17 Oct 2026, 15:29
22,735
+3
16 Oct 2026, 16:04
22,732
first reading
Engagement
384 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 98 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
21.0%
avg views ÷ 22,951 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,820
109 posts measured
Reaction rate
14.1%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
113
of 384 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 November 2026
Posts held
384 (4 August 2026 – 6 November 2026)
Views total
524,920
Reactions total
73,855
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
7 Nov 2026, 02:30 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈13,000
Videos
≈2,100
Links
≈1,390
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
38m 34s
Average length
30s
Measured directly from 77 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
239,928 reactions across 364 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 55.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
custom 5357415430480735126
132,382
55.2%
custom 5382100926813196317
59,333
24.7%
🔥
48,213
20.1%
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 370 of the 384 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 243,768 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 384 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 6 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
202
across the posts below
Posts paid on
41
of 370 we hold a reading for · 11%
Most on one post
50
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @leosha7. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 384 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 August 2026 to 6 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 7 of 113 posts held from the last 30 days (6.19%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
леоша, извините за вопрос, но на какие даты вы будете на концертах в тае? 🥹🥹
Леоша , а могу узнать, идете ли вы на концерт в Тае и на какое число? Мой первый концерт, вдруг повезет и пересечемся🤍🫂
Да! Я буду на двух днях и информацию скажу чуть позже! Сама еще в процессе броней самолета и прочего вот этого 😰
И обязательно будут специальные фрибисы для концерта!!! Ждите и следите за новостями на канале! 🎀
здравству…
🐰Обращение Минхо к STAY во время сегодняшнего концерта:
Независимо от того, в каких обстоятельствах я сейчас нахожусь, я всегда буду стараться изо всех сил. Пожалуйста, не переживайте за меня слишком сильно.
И надеюсь, что каждый из вас будет соответствовать значению своего фандомного имени — STAY.
Да, именно это я и хотел сказать, правда?
Другие участники уже много раз говорили о том, как сильно любят STAY, и я чувс…
Showing the 12 most recent of 384 posts we hold for @leosha7. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 384 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 6 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 14 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
2
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
2
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
0
vacant every time we have ever looked
@leosha7 named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Evidenced gone
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
@herboriste1515 named in 1 post, 2 October 2026 – 2 October 2026 · confirmed gone 5 November 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
@rroonnii_1 named in 1 post, 2 October 2026 – 2 October 2026 · confirmed gone 12 October 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 19 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Озвучка by Ayka @ozvuchkabyayka · 21,298 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 50 here — alongside 49 others — read 21 September 2026
Лобанов озвучка Stray Kids @LobanowVoiceSKZ · 45,144 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 49 here — alongside 48 others — read 16 September 2026
STAY room | SKZ @skz_stay_room · 44,717 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 51 here — alongside 50 others — read 27 August 2026
Support | Stray Kids @StrayKids_JYP_Support · 20,943 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 50 here — alongside 49 others — read 23 September 2026
STAAA🏁 @staaa0220 · 99,800 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 45 here — alongside 44 others — read 15 August 2026
Тут обитают минсоны ᵕ̈ @minsung_leehan · 20,113 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 46 here — alongside 45 others — read 27 September 2026
Оксана Флаф @fluff_fashion · 36,893 Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 16 September 2026
Озвучка Kadza @kadzavoice · 25,327 Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 48 here — alongside 47 others — read 16 September 2026
LEE KNOW | LEE MINHO | STRAY KIDS @MinhoSKZ · 19,443 Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 27 September 2026
Мир Stray Kids @straykids_d8 · 27,087 Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 48 here — alongside 47 others — read 9 September 2026
ELEVATE @elevate_team · 45,952 Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 52 here — alongside 51 others — read 26 August 2026
한국어 | корейский по капле @StrayKids_global · 37,559 Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 29 August 2026
FELIX LEE | STRAY KIDS @FelixSKZ · 20,361 Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 24 September 2026
Stray Kids | JYP Entertainment @StrayKidsKpop · 32,889 Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 3 September 2026
This channel appears in 14 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“леоша ✧˖° ✴︎” (@leosha7), 22,951 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/leosha7.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
