Channel
@leraneanonim
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
305subscribers
+2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001335918129 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @leraneanonim |
| Created | 29 January 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 5 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 5 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/leraneanonim |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 5 Sept 2026, 19:58 | 305 | -1 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 16:43 | 306 | +3 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 22:32 | 303 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 09:46 | 303 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 10 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 28 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
196 reactions across 15 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 80 | 40.8% | |
| 😁 | 53 | 27.0% | |
| 🔥 | 20 | 10.2% | |
| 👍 | 18 | 9.18% | |
| 👏 | 8 | 4.08% | |
| 🍾 | 4 | 2.04% | |
| 🤔 | 3 | 1.53% | |
| 🥰 | 3 | 1.53% | |
| 🌭 | 2 | 1.02% | |
| 🐳 | 2 | 1.02% | |
| 👀 | 2 | 1.02% | |
| 😱 | 1 | 0.51% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 196 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 10 May 2026 to 28 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Я в небольшой панике. За последний месяц я дважды отправила редакторам не тот файл с текстом (разумеется, нужный и правильный текст при этом был написан — просто я перепутала именно документы). Такого не было ни разу за всю жизнь. И вот… Оба раза у меня есть объяснение, которое, конечно, не является оправданием. Пора что-то менять, очевидно. И глицинчику для внимания бахнуть.
❤5👍3🥰2🌭1
Осторожно, злой кот. Очень злой. Невероятно.
❤11😁4👀2🔥1🥰1😱1
Сегодня вспоминали нетленную классику. Попросила Чатджипити нарисовать мне кротовуху. Воть, сделяль. Крот на первой картинке по ходу с нее и ослеп🤣 А на второй он прям наслаждается плывет. Чатик настаивает, что употреблять кротовуху следует с сальцем, лучком-чесночком, соленым огурчиком:) Оцените проработку деталей. Хоть сейчас в продакшн🤓
😁10🌭1
Блин, стыдно) Выхожу из подъезда сейчас. Навстречу женщина. Пакет черный в руках. Спрашивает: не подскажете, мол, код от подъезда. Я так сурово: не подскажу. А у нас код поменяли недавно. Замок работает, но… спасибо, что живой, в общем. Домофон половина подъезда ставить не хочет (да, дно, я считаю). И у меня, так сказать, фантомные боли. Дело в том, что некоторые соседи, видимо, то ли в психушке жить привыкли, то ли…
😁7❤1
Video message, posted without a caption
Господь всемогущий🥰 во-первых, сама по себе новости чудесная. Во-вторых, мне нравится, как написано это объявление.
❤6🔥3
Победила сегодня в Свояке — вообще я выхожу в финал, да и выигрываю, довольно часто. Но этот турнир для меня особенный, потому что он — мемориальный. В память о нашей подруге Танечке Лазаренко. Она ушла в апреле, сразу после Пасхи. И я как будто до сих пор этого понять не могу. Типа… ну не может же Таня не прийти на игру, не может же такого быть, что она не ругается на шумных нас с Димасиком (мы долбоебы сурикаты). …
❤19🔥4🐳1
Вот хотела выбросить – теперь оставлю. Кроссворды на дороге не валяются, знаете ли, в моем возрасте уже пора думать о сохранении менталочки (в любом возрасте пора). Составлявшему это маркетологу ставлю 5-. Минус за шрифт. Вы туда всего «Зятька» что ли впихнуть хотели?:))
😁6🔥2
Это, конечно, все очень мило. Но вообще-то целый дом никто не эвакуировал…
Когда наврал в резюме, но все равно получил должность
😁12
Куда летят медведииии, в какие города?:)
🔥7👍2
Всем одну больничную кошку. Я гладила. Она хорошая.
❤13
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @leraneanonim. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Федоренко.рф” (@leraneanonim), 305 subscribers as measured 5 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/leraneanonim.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.