Channel
@leshchief
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
319subscribers
+5 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001794438901 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @leshchief |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 5 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 5 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/leshchief |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 5 Sept 2026, 04:59 | 319 | -1 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 03:16 | 320 | +4 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 15:35 | 316 | +2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 22:17 | 314 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 11:23 | 314 | first reading |
10 posts held, back to 21 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 10 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
117 reactions across 10 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 37 | 31.6% | |
| 🔥 | 29 | 24.8% | |
| ❤ | 19 | 16.2% | |
| 👏 | 11 | 9.40% | |
| 💯 | 10 | 8.55% | |
| 🎉 | 5 | 4.27% | |
| 🤝 | 4 | 3.42% | |
| 👎 | 2 | 1.71% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 117 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 21 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @leshchief. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 10 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 21 July 2026 to 6 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
В Санкт-Петербурге сложилась тревожная ситуация по выборам: кандидаты в депутаты массово удаляют или переименовывают свои страницы в соцсетях. Почему? Потому что любой старый пост, репост, музыка из приложений на фоне видео или даже стоковая картинка могут быть истолкованы как нарушение и стать поводом для снятия с выборов. При этом в действующем законодательстве нет прямого указания на то, что отдельное сообщение в…
👍15❤3🤝1
Поговорили о предпринимательстве, социальной ответственности бизнеса и политике с Ильёй Лещевым, автором ИД Питер. Кстати, бизнес-роман "Шведский стол" можно приобрести на сайте издательства
👏4👍2
🇷🇺 С Днем Воздушно-десантных войск! 🇷🇺 Сегодня, 2 августа, свой профессиональный праздник отмечают «крылатая пехота», «голубые береты» — элита Вооруженных Сил России . Всех военнослужащих и ветеранов ВДВ! 🎉 Как все начиналось: историческая справка История ВДВ берет начало 2 августа 1930 года. Именно в этот день под Воронежем в ходе учений ВВС Московского военного округа с борта тяжелого бомбардировщика ТБ-3 было в…
❤2
🤩 Бирюзовые слоны против чёрных ссылок: как стрит-арт очищает улицы от наркорекламы В пяти районах края наши сторонники в рамках проекта «Второй шанс» провели масштабный рейд против уличной наркорекламы. Вместо того чтобы просто закрашивать опасные адреса и ссылки, мы превратили эту рутинную борьбу в искусство. 🤩 Серые фасады и остановки, покрытые запрещённой информацией, получили новый визуальный код — теперь их у…
❤2
«НОВЫЕ ЛЮДИ» ПОДВЕЛИ ИТОГИ ПЕРВОГО СОЗЫВА: 5 ЛЕТ ВМЕСТО ЗАПРЕТОВ Самую молодую фракцию Госдумы признали самой эффективной оппозиционной силой 30 июля фракция «Новые люди» впервые отчиталась о полном пятилетнем цикле работы в VIII созыве. На пресс-конференции «Пять лет уважения к человеку» лидеры – Алексей Нечаев, Владислав Даванков и Сардана Авксентьева – представили главные законодательные итоги и планы на новый со…
👍7❤4
Друзья, решение суда известно. Юрий Куликов снят с выборов по 6-му округу. Формальный повод-трек в ролике, сделанном в программе CupCat. Но давайте по порядку. Суд длился три часа. Сторона Амосова пыталась доказать нарушение авторских прав через… Яндекс.Музыку. Сервис, который к ролику не имел вообще никакого отношения. Название трека в разных сервисах отличалось, и выговорить его без запинки не смог никто. Кроме Ку…
👍13👏4❤1
Присутсвую на заседании суда. Объявлен перерыв. Вы знаете, ситуация и правда выглядит сюрреалистично. Пока наши бойцы на передовой решают вопрос жизни и смерти, пока семьи эвакуируют детей из прифронтовых зон, мы здесь выясняем, кто и под какой трек агитировал избирателей. Считаю, что это не просто юридический казус, а показатель полной потери политических ориентиров. Когда у оппонента нет реальной программы и аргуме…
💯10👎2🤝1
Друзья, хорошая новость! Меня зарегистрировали кандидатом в депутаты Законодательного Собрания Санкт-Петербурга по одномандатному избирательному округу № 5. В округ входят муниципальные образования: * Северный * Сампсониевское * Сосновское * Светлановское Осенью, 20 сентября, нам предстоит выбрать путь развития округа на ближайшие годы.
🔥20❤5🎉5👏3🤝2
Последнее заседание VIII созыва Госдумы позади. Мы против запретов и фальши. За честность, свободу и уважение к людям. С этим пришли, и с этим уходим. На видео выступление лидера партии «Новые люди» Алексея Нечаева.
❤2🔥2
Теперь официально — нас зарегистрировали! 297 кандидатов из федерального списка получили удостоверения в Центральной избирательной комиссии. Для нас это вторые выборы в Государственную Думу. В наш первый созыв мы доказали свою эффективность в составе фракции из 15 человек. В следующем созыве это подтвердим. Пожелайте нам удачи — Новых должно быть больше!
🔥7
Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @leshchief. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Илья Лещев” (@leshchief), 319 subscribers as measured 5 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/leshchief.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.