Channel
@lesoleilduciel
On this record: Growth Β· Engagement Β· What this channel posts Β· Reactions Β· Posts Β· Citations Β· Cite this entry
234subscribers
-9 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002354788996 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @lesoleilduciel |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 β estimated from Telegramβs id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 10 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/lesoleilduciel |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Sept 2026, 23:19 | 234 | -3 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 10:45 | 237 | -2 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 10:23 | 239 | -4 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 19:02 | 243 | -1 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 09:56 | 244 | +1 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 21:30 | 243 | first reading |
14 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 β the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelβs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegramβs post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute β we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel β not this channelβs whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegramβs own rounded chrome, so it carries no β mark.
51 reactions across 6 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 49.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| π | 25 | 49.0% | |
| π | 12 | 23.5% | |
| π | 8 | 15.7% | |
| π | 4 | 7.84% | |
| π | 2 | 3.92% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β π is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β 4.34K, 1.2M β so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramβs own count on each post β not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β those same posts carry 51 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by βa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageβ.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
ΛΛπ’Φ΄ΰ»π¦’ΛπΏππππΊππ½ ππππ ππΎπππΊππΎ πΊππ½ π¨'π π ππΊππΎ ππππΎπππππ π πππΎ ππππ π»πΊππΎπ½ ππ ππππ πππ»πΎ Limit: till I cross it out (Pls be patient it may take some time π)
Signed ππ§π§π’π
Sticker, posted without a caption
Signed ππ§π§π’π
Sterling point, you're gonna be missed
π3π2
Signed ππ§π§π’π
Photo, posted without a caption
π3π2
Signed ππ§π§π’π
π₯ππππΊππ½ ππππ ππΎπππΊππΎ πΊππ½ π¨'π π πππππΎ πππ πΊ πππππ π ππππ πΎ ππΎππ, πΊ πΏπΎπ π πππΎπ πΊπ»πππ πππ π»πΊππΎπ½ ππ πππΎ πππ»πΎ π¨ πππ πΏπππ πππ βοΈ γ €γ €γ €γ €π«ππππ : π£π’γ €, π©πππ ππΎππΎ γ €πγ €
Signed ππ§π§π’π
Look who's got engagedππ«ΆπΌ
π5π1π1π1
Signed ππ§π§π’π
Sticker, posted without a caption
Signed ππ§π§π’π
From this week
π9π4π3π2π1
Signed ππ§π§π’π
My sweet baby.π€π«ΆπΌ
π8
Signed ππ§π§π’π
forward this to your channel & I'll give you a f1 radio message based on your personality.
Signed ππ§π§π’π
Forward this message to your channels, and Iβll randomly give you a song along with the story behind it. π§ limit:15
Signed ππ§π§π’π
We've started a new RM channel with a few people you might already know. from breaking news to club history, edits, and everything in between,we'll be sharing it all here. hope to see you there!π
Signed ππ§π§π’π
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @lesoleilduciel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason β naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides β the βNamed by N registered channelsβ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 September 2026 β this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
βππ πΓͺπ―ππ«π’πβ (@lesoleilduciel), 234 subscribers as measured 10 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lesoleilduciel.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.