Channel
@lesya_zdesa
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
162subscribers
+3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001885798903 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @lesya_zdesa |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/lesya_zdesa |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Sept 2026, 06:38 | 162 | +3 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 07:55 | 159 | +1 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 17:33 | 158 | +2 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 08:46 | 156 | -2 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 18:44 | 158 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 17:31 | 159 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:03 | 159 | first reading |
14 posts held, back to 1 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 29 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
71 reactions across 14 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 26 | 36.6% | |
| 💘 | 7 | 9.86% | |
| 🥰 | 7 | 9.86% | |
| 🔥 | 5 | 7.04% | |
| custom 5420493197090501053 | 4 | 5.63% | |
| 😁 | 4 | 5.63% | |
| 🤡 | 4 | 5.63% | |
| custom 5370736383218436550 | 3 | 4.23% | |
| 🌚 | 3 | 4.23% | |
| 🍓 | 3 | 4.23% | |
| 💩 | 2 | 2.82% | |
| 😢 | 2 | 2.82% | |
| custom 5406993586598211134 | 1 | 1.41% |
Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 71 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 1 July 2026 to 29 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Сегодня празднует свой день рождения наша Олеся Фролова! Горячо любим и поздравляем тебя! Желаем здоровья, счастья, больше отдыха и меньше стресса💙 Скучаем и обнимаем! inst : https://www.instagram.com/lesya.zdesa?igsh=MXNxb3NocHF0OWt5bA== С любовью, Лазаревцы🤍
❤2🍓2🥰1
Photo, posted without a caption
❤5🌚1
коротко о насущном да, я дура
🥰3🤡1😁1
Photo, posted without a caption
custom 54204931970905010534
пока так)
❤7💘3🍓1🤡1
Мастер сказал записывать свои сны, тем временем мои сны: Мне приснилось, что я дьявол в юбке, вернее, я была напарницей дьявола, мы появились из ниоткуда, посреди огромного города, как супергерои, только наоборот. Мы были одеты во все черное такие красивые и секси!! Я могла летать, управляла погодой и еще что-то могла (не помню), прям во сне создала смерч и запрыгнула в него сама, громко смеясь. Мы не явились сами, …
😁3🌚2❤1💘1💩1
меня так бесит, что я в жару не могу есть, вот физически главное я еще понимаю, что хочу съесть ВСЕЕЕЕ, а на деле даже йогурт не могу проглотить((( жара 🥲
❤1🤡1
а еще у меня появился тикток, не знаю, что я буду туда выкладывать))) предполагаю, что всякую дурь)) но вот: https://www.tiktok.com/@frollletc?_r=1&_t=ZS-97hw1TFhCyO
❤1
Video message, posted without a caption
🔥2❤1💘1
Video message, posted without a caption
😢2❤1
Video message, posted without a caption
❤2
Video message, posted without a caption
🥰2
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @lesya_zdesa. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Леся здеся” (@lesya_zdesa), 162 subscribers as measured 14 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lesya_zdesa.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.