Кстати, если нажать вот сюда 👉 #рецепт в конце поста, то можно выбирать, что приготовить сегодня или в выходной. Жмите на #рецепт и кнопку справа вверху "этот чат" и перед вами список рецептов 🍤 🧐Ну и всё дублируем в ВК, если у кого-то шалит Телеграм:(( Сообщество ЛабФуд во ВКонтакте Канал с рецептами в ВК 🍽️

Channel
Ресторанные блюда за «сотку» с Яной Нетреба 💯
@letolabfood
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
7,557subscribers
+57 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001786099717 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @letolabfood |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 13 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/letolabfood |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 75% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Sept 2026, 20:55 | 7,557 | +14 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 08:01 | 7,543 | +8 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 10:39 | 7,535 | +6 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 13:00 | 7,529 | +23 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 20:29 | 7,506 | +7 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 15:44 | 7,499 | +1 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 06:42 | 7,498 | +3 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 06:29 | 7,495 | +5 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 12:45 | 7,490 | -8 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 05:27 | 7,498 | -6 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 15:31 | 7,504 | +4 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 10:45 | 7,500 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 10:38 | 7,500 | first reading |
Engagement
80 posts held, back to 1 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 1.79%
- avg views ÷ 7,557 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 135
- 9 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 2.72%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 9
- of 80 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 7 of 9 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 80 (1 August 2026 – 28 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,217 |
| Reactions total | 26 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 28 Aug 2026, 22:13 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 2m 06s
- Average length
- 21s
Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
249 reactions across 53 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 22.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 57 | 22.9% | |
| 👍 | 48 | 19.3% | |
| ❤🔥 | 32 | 12.9% | |
| 👏 | 24 | 9.64% | |
| 🔥 | 23 | 9.24% | |
| 🤣 | 16 | 6.43% | |
| 😍 | 14 | 5.62% | |
| 👀 | 11 | 4.42% | |
| 💯 | 7 | 2.81% | |
| custom 5267500801240092311 | 4 | 1.61% | |
| 👌 | 4 | 1.61% | |
| ✍ | 3 | 1.20% | |
| 😱 | 2 | 0.803% | |
| 🤔 | 2 | 0.803% | |
| custom 5267085306103884031 | 1 | 0.402% | |
| 💋 | 1 | 0.402% |
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 53 of the 80 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 249 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 80 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
От этих куриных котлет балдеют все: дело в одном ингредиенте 🧡 Можно продолжать готовить котлеты из куриной грудки по старинке: скучно, пресно, чересчур диетично. А потом удивляться, почему домашние воротят носы. Поэтому подруги сразу расхватали этот рецепт, потому что обычные куриные котлеты надоели и детям, и мужьям. Дайте шанс этим котлеткам, даже если неохота возиться с фаршем. Хотя это недолго и можно сделать…
❤2
Раз уж я отправила вас в личный кабинет 👉 сделайте ещё одну полезную штуку:)) Наша школа выросла, и теперь среди учеников есть не только девчонки, но и мужчины. 🎊 И некоторые справедливо обижаются, что в письмах и соцсетях я обращаюсь только к "девочкам" 🩷 Чтобы это исправить, снова зайдите в личный кабинет на GetCourse, в раздел «Профиль», и поставьте галочку в графе «Пол». Так все сообщения будут корректны. 💬💬💬…
💋1😍1
Бонусы, о которых вы забыли! Да-да 🚩Давно ли вы проверяли, сколько накопили бонусных баллов? Часто про них забывают. А у вас может уже хватит на оплату целого курса, нового гайда или любимого рецепта (например, той самой Павловой) 🥒 Так что проверяем прямо сейчас в личном кабинете на GetCourse! 👆 Вверху на скриншоте видно, где искать
👀1
Купили много зелени ( или выросла своя на даче) и понимаете, что не съедите 💚 Выбирайте, какой путь спасения вам подходит 👆 💚 или пишите свой:) 👍 за пользу не жалеем!
❤🔥8
Хотите верьте, хотите нет, но… это блюдо готовил не шеф-повар ресторана, а обычная хозяйка, которая когда-то пробегала мимо мясной витрины 🫣 Теперь она знает систему: как выбрать мясо, как замариновать, сколько держать на огне, чтобы снаружи была корочка, а внутри сочность. И дело не в таланте и не в дорогом оборудовании. Дело в понимании, что и зачем делать — а дальше руки сами всё сделают правильно. Результат = б…
❤🔥3👍1💯1
Всего 10 секунд из эфира 🕔 И всего лишь песчинка в море полезной информации, которую собрала для вас я на эфире по 🔡🔡🔡🔡‼️ Готовьте блокнот и ручку и приходите на встречу завтра. Пора исправлять ошибки, которые вы делали годами :(( 🎤 смотреть эфир 27 августа
❤🔥2🔥1
Video message, posted without a caption
‼️3 мифа про мясо, в которые портят вам жизнь:))) 🥩Миф 1 Хорошее мясо подвластно только повару-мужчине, а не домохозяйке Дело не в силе рук и не в профессиональной кухне. Дело в понимании технологии, а её можно освоить как дома, так и в ресторане. 🥩Миф 2 Мясо нужно долго мариновать, иначе не получится вкусно На деле часто важнее не время маринада, а правильные пропорции и техника подготовки. Иногда 15-20 минут дают…
❤🔥3❤1👍1
😮 Вопрос, на который я отвечаю примерно 185 раз в год «А почему в ваших рецептах всегда акцент на хорошем оливковом масле?» Оливковое масло — 😌 Мы используем его в салатах, выпечке и тд. Поэтому его качество и вкус напрямую влияют на вкус блюда. Как выбрать «правильное» оливковое масло: ➡️ Упаковка из темного стекла защищает масло от воздействия света, ухудшающего его вкус и свойства. Прозрачная бутылка – мимо. …
👍3😍1
Что бы такое приготовить по-быстрому... — знакомая мысль в конце рабочего дня? Ужинаем мы каждый день, а фантазии с каждым разом всё меньше 🫣 Летом ещё можно отделаться лёгким перекусом, но когда на носу осень, организму хочется не листика руколы, а настоящей сытости и энергии 🔥 Вы снова откладываете мясо, поэтому что долго мариновать, готовить, следить, чтобы не передержать? Но всё изменится! Эфир «Как научиться…
❤2👍1
У кого были сомнения или ошибочки — увидимся ЗДЕСЬ 🥩
Showing the 12 most recent of 80 posts we hold for @letolabfood. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 6 most recent of 7 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
🥩 а ещё мне интересно, ЧТО чаще всего не получается у вас?
- Мясо сухое25%
- Жесткое25%
- Снаружи горит. Внутри сыро15%
- Не умею выбирать15%
- Не хватает идей40%
- Всё получается, но хочу ресторанный результат 🍳35%
The shares total 155%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
🥩 Что поможет сделать мясо мягче?
- Подходящий маринад89%
- Плюс 5 минут жарки7%
- Сила повара0%
- Какое есть, уже не изменить4%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
🥰 Что обычно мешает получить хрустящую корочку?
- Влажная поверхность мяса4%
- Переполненая сковорода12%
- Слишком раннее переворачивание8%
- Всё перечисленное76%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
🥩 Какой вариант мяса выбрать для быстрого ужина?
- Кусочки мясной вырезки72%
- Не важно, главное без кости24%
- Если очень хочется есть — любое мясо4%
- Мясо быстро не приготовить:(0%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Моя окрошка только
- На квасе56%
- На кефире33%
- На просекко8%
- Пока не определилась3%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Вечное: АРБУЗ или ДЫНЯ ⁉️ Голосуем ⤵️
- Арбуз рулит 🍉31%
- Конечно дыня 🤩36%
- Мне всего и побольше :)))33%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 80 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 28 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@Dasha_Chernenko · 92,093
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 17 August 2026
@mamatovcom · 33,919
Telegram ranks this channel #83 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 3 September 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Ресторанные блюда за «сотку» с Яной Нетреба 💯” (@letolabfood), 7,557 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/letolabfood.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.