Мужские костюмы | Пермь • Статус и идеальная посадка
• 800+ моделей в наличии
• Работа ателье в подарок
• Размеры 44-64, рост до 2 м
• Casual, пальто, аксессуары, обувь
10:00-20:00
ул. Сибирская, 4а
Created
5 June 2023 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
Ecommerce storefront — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Views per post sit far below this size band
35.8 average views per post against 7,276 subscribers — an engagement rate of 0.492%. Across the 14,882 registered channels in the same cohort — 3,248–9,999 subscribers, posting mainly in Russian — the middle half sit between 6.95% and 25.4%, with a median of 13.7%.
What this was computed from
Window
30 days (5 October 2026 – 4 November 2026)
Posts measured
11 of 11 published in the window (11 exact, 0 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled
394
Mature posts only
0.579% over 9 posts read at least 24h after publication
When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or below the 1st percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — below it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.
This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.
Recorded under the key err_low, last confirmed 4 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Growth
25 measurements spanning 87 days, net -522. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,198–7,876 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 25
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
3 Nov 2026, 00:06
7,276
-27
31 Oct 2026, 00:55
7,303
-27
28 Oct 2026, 09:16
7,330
-19
25 Oct 2026, 06:26
7,349
-13
22 Oct 2026, 06:37
7,362
-22
18 Oct 2026, 15:10
7,384
-28
15 Oct 2026, 05:39
7,412
-15
12 Oct 2026, 02:20
7,427
-30
5 Oct 2026, 16:37
7,457
-42
27 Sept 2026, 19:01
7,499
-63
18 Sept 2026, 17:39
7,562
-27
14 Sept 2026, 16:57
7,589
-19
11 Sept 2026, 05:18
7,608
-20
6 Sept 2026, 16:37
7,628
-23
2 Sept 2026, 00:08
7,651
-24
30 Aug 2026, 07:04
7,675
-19
27 Aug 2026, 14:03
7,694
+22
24 Aug 2026, 07:16
7,672
-13
21 Aug 2026, 01:23
7,685
-27
17 Aug 2026, 18:26
7,712
first reading
Engagement
31 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 19 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
0.529%
avg views ÷ 7,276 subscribers
Avg views / post
38.5
11 posts measured
Reaction rate
7.33%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
11
of 31 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 November 2026
Posts held
31 (2 August 2026 – 4 November 2026)
Views total
423
Reactions total
31
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
5 Nov 2026, 01:27 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈1,060
Videos
≈290
Links
≈13
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 5 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
4m 28s
Average length
17s
Measured directly from 16 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
47 reactions across 17 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
16
34.0%
❤
15
31.9%
🤩
7
14.9%
🥰
5
10.6%
👍
3
6.38%
🤯
1
2.13%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 31 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 47 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 31 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 4 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 11 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Сила — в единстве. Красота — в индивидуальности.
В честь Дня народного единства хотим поделиться особенной съёмкой, в которой приняли участие пять девушек разных национальностей в костюмах LEVEL MEN’S.
Пять разных внешностей, характеров и историй, объединённых одной идеей: настоящая красота не имеет стандартов.
Как отметила фотограф проекта:
«Я сняла 5 девушек разной национальности. Но не стала делать различия гл…
С Днём народного единства!
Этот праздник — ещё один повод вспомнить, как важно поддерживать друг друга и вместе двигаться вперёд. Именно в единстве, сплочённости и взаимной поддержке заключается наша общая сила.
Желаем мира, благополучия, добра и побольше светлых моментов!
С праздником! 💚
Цветовые сочетания, которые всегда выглядят дорого 🤎
Иногда достаточно добавить один оттенок, чтобы привычный образ заиграл совершенно по-новому.
Шоколадный, кофейный, графитовый, тёмно-синий — каждый из них по-своему раскрывает классический стиль.
Сохраняйте сочетания, чтобы не потерять, и расскажите в комментариях, какое понравилось больше 👇🏻
Воссоздаём культовый образ Дензела Вашингтона 🎬
Двубортный костюм глубокого графитового оттенка, белоснежная рубашка, бордовый галстук с деликатным узором и платок паше.
Сдержанная классика, в которой каждая деталь на своём месте. Никаких лишних акцентов — только безупречный крой, элегантность и характер.
А как вам такое перевоплощение? Удалось передать атмосферу оригинала? 👀
Особенные моменты складываются из деталей 🤍
Её платье, его костюм, любимые цветы и взгляды, в которых больше слов, чем можно сказать.
В LEVEL MEN’S мы знаем, насколько важно найти тот самый образ для одного из самых важных дней в жизни.
Чтобы спустя годы, пересматривая фотографии, вы снова влюблялись в каждую деталь.
Один костюм — совершенно разное впечатление.
Иногда достаточно сменить рубашку, галстук или нагрудный платок, чтобы привычный образ заиграл по-новому.
В этом и заключается искусство мужского стиля — в умении сочетать цвета, фактуры и детали.
А какой вариант понравился вам больше? 👇
LEVEL MEN’S — стиль в деталях.
НОВАЯ КОЛЛЕКЦИЯ УЖЕ В LEVEL MEN’S 🖤
Новые модели, актуальные оттенки и безупречная посадка — в наших салонах уже представлена новая коллекция мужских костюмов.
От сдержанной классики до выразительных образов с характером. Для важных событий, деловых встреч и моментов, когда хочется выглядеть особенно.
Приходите знакомиться с новинками, примерять и выбирать свой идеальный костюм.
📍 Пермь, ул. Сибирская, 4А
Запись…
⚽️ «Золотой мяч 2026» — образы, которые заслуживают отдельной награды!
Мбаппе, Ямаль и Кейн — у каждого свой стиль, но всех объединяет одно: безупречная классика.
Мы решили повторить образы футболистов в LEVEL MEN’S и показать, как они выглядят в жизни 🔥
От классического смокинга до смелых сочетаний с акцентными деталями.
А чей образ понравился вам больше всего? 👀
Пишите в комментариях: Мбаппе, Ямаль или Кейн?
Как сочетать цвета, чтобы выглядеть дорого? 👀
Белый, коричневый, тёмно-синий и серый — беспроигрышная база мужского гардероба. Но именно детали и правильно подобранные оттенки делают образ интереснее.
Сохраняйте эти три сочетания, чтобы в следующий раз не ломать голову над тем, что с чем носить.
А за стильными образами ждём вас в LEVEL MEN’S 🤝
Чёрный костюм, чёрная рубашка, расстёгнутый ворот — готовый образ для красивого вечера.
Здесь всё строится на деталях: чёткая линия плеч, лаконичные лацканы и лёгкий блеск рубашки на фоне матового пиджака. Лоферы завершают сочетание и добавляют ему расслабленности.
На ужин вдвоём, в театр или на торжество — сохраняйте образ и приходите на примерку в LEVEL MEN’S. Подберём вашу посадку и дополним костюм всем необходи…
В стиле Джейсона Стейтема.
Образ, где ничего лишнего — и поэтому он выглядит круто.
Глубокий шоколадный оттенок костюма, чёрная водолазка и классический крой.
Образ для тех, кому не нужно привлекать внимание деталями — достаточно хорошего костюма.
Новая коллекция LEVEL MEN’S.
Showing the 12 most recent of 31 posts we hold for @level_mensprm. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
4
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
4
vacant every time we have ever looked
@level_mensprm named 4 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@ternclubperm named in 2 posts, 20 August 2026 – 23 August 2026
@yana_svetlaya_foto named in 2 posts, 20 August 2026 – 23 August 2026
@gkgulliverperm named in 2 posts, 8 August 2026 – 9 August 2026
@restaurant_birds_perm named in 2 posts, 8 August 2026 – 9 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Мужские костюмы Пермь | Level men's” (@level_mensprm), 7,276 subscribers as measured 3 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/level_mensprm.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
