Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 84% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
31 measurements spanning 34 days, net -5,993. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 141,694–149,485 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 31
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
8 Sept 2026, 18:15
142,593
-455
5 Sept 2026, 08:42
143,048
-150
3 Sept 2026, 10:58
143,198
-177
2 Sept 2026, 03:55
143,375
-136
1 Sept 2026, 05:45
143,511
-117
31 Aug 2026, 08:43
143,628
-140
30 Aug 2026, 08:56
143,768
-164
29 Aug 2026, 07:33
143,932
-245
28 Aug 2026, 08:36
144,177
-129
27 Aug 2026, 07:33
144,306
-152
26 Aug 2026, 07:07
144,458
-219
25 Aug 2026, 06:39
144,677
-151
24 Aug 2026, 06:11
144,828
-249
22 Aug 2026, 16:27
145,077
-307
21 Aug 2026, 06:34
145,384
-185
20 Aug 2026, 04:15
145,569
-207
19 Aug 2026, 06:53
145,776
-167
18 Aug 2026, 09:18
145,943
-234
17 Aug 2026, 11:47
146,177
-261
16 Aug 2026, 02:53
146,438
first reading
Engagement
23 posts held, back to 14 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 72 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
5.73%
avg views ÷ 142,593 subscribers
Avg views / post
8,170
10 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.249%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
10
of 23 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 September 2026
Posts held
23 (14 July 2026 – 8 September 2026)
Views total
81,670
Reactions total
203
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
9 Sept 2026, 16:16 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
663
Videos
108
Links
41
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
2m 51s
Average length
29s
Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
468 reactions across 23 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 24.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
114
24.4%
👏
52
11.1%
❤🔥
47
10.0%
🔥
47
10.0%
🤝
37
7.91%
🤩
27
5.77%
🏆
25
5.34%
🥰
21
4.49%
💯
20
4.27%
⚡
17
3.63%
🙏
17
3.63%
🤣
16
3.42%
😍
15
3.21%
🤗
9
1.92%
😘
3
0.641%
🎉
1
0.214%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 23 of the 23 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 468 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 23 most recent posts we hold, published 14 July 2026 to 8 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
بعد خریدتون شما ول نمیشید به امون خدا 🙌
خیلی از عزیزان این صنف بعد خرید و گرفتن پول از شما خیلی تمایلی به حل کردن مشکلاتتون ندارن . این یه حقیقت تلخه . ولی ما اصول کاریمون این نیست که فقط بهتون بفروشیم و بعدش همه جوره در خدمت مشتری های عزیزمون هستیم . وظیفمونم هست ❤️
از کسی سرویس بخر که بعد خریدم شما رو دوست داشته باشن 👇
🫐 @lexonet_bot
یوتیوب رو از بدون فیلترش هم بهتر اورد بالا اورد 😎
یه تست یوتیوب گردی هم گفتیم بگیریم بعد چند وقت که نشون بدیم هنوز سرویس لگزونت از همه لحاظ رو فرمه و همه فن حریفه 🎥
سرویسی و بخرید که همه فن حریف باشه و در بلند مدت کیفیت شو حتما حفظ کنه 👇
🫐 @lexonet_bot
یه اسپید تست خیلی رندوم زدم پشمام ریخت 😐
معمولا این تایم ، تایم شلوغیه مصرف هست و همیشه سرعت کمی کند میشه تو این تایما به خاطر مصرف بالا و ترافیک مصرفی . ولی برای لگزونت هیچ محدودیتی وجود نداره و این حرفا جلوی سرویس های ما فقط یه شوخیه 😉
باور نمیکنی ؟ ربات و استارت کن با اکانت تست خودت سرعت و ببین 👇
🫐 @lexonet_bot
اینستا گردی با سرویس لگزونت 💬
اینستا رو بدون لحظه ای لگ و کندی داره میاره بالا . با سرویس لگزونت هیچ محدودیت و کندی سرعتی برای شما وجود نداره عملا .
باور نمی کنی ؟ همین الان بات و استارت کن و با تست رایگان خودت تست کن 👇
🫐 @lexonet_bot
لگزونت قاتل هر چی فیلترینگه 💣
دوستانی که در جریان هستن ، جناب اقای جمنای فیلتره داخل ایران و با هر فیلتری هم بالا نمیاد . ولی نه برای ما 😉
سرویسی رو بخر که همه محدودیت هارو یه جا برات برداره 👇
🫐 @lexonet_bot
درود عزیزان 🎩
از دیشب به یه مشکل فنی خورده بودیم که لینک اشتراک ها اد نمیشد و اشتراک ها داخل اپ ها کلا اضافه نمیشد . طبق برسی هایی که انجام شد مشکل و حل کردیم و الان کامل اوکیه . ✅
برای حل کردنش ، طبق تصویر گذاشته شده ، برید توی ربات و دکمه اشتراک های منو بزنید . بعدش رو اشتراک کلیک کنید و بزنید لینک جدید بهتون میده و با اون راحت میتونید اد بشید . 😐
از کسی سرویس بخر که قدیمیه این کاره 😎
هم پشتیبانی قوی داریم . هم قیمتمون پایین ترین بازاره . هم در ازای این قیمت پایین کیفیت کار مون بالاس . هم مشکل سرعت نداریم . منتظر چی هستی پس ؟ هنوزم شک داری بیای از ما بخری ؟🤨
همین الان بات و استارت کن و دو دل بودن و بزار کنار 👇
🫐 @Lexonet_bot
👋 درود دوستان
❗️اگه یه همچین بنر ها و متن هایی رو دیدید اومده براتون که روی بات یا چنل ما هست . بدونید و در جریان باشید که این ها از طرف خود تلگرامه و از طرف ما نیست و روش کلیک نکنید . ( برای دوستانی که تل پریمیوم ندارن این نوع تبلیغات نمایش داده میشه )
😉 بهترین سرویس دهنده همین پایینه بیخود دنبال چیزی غیر این نگرد 👇
🫐 @Lexonet_bot
کیفیت وی پی ان های رایگان به روایت تصویر 🥺 ( کیفیت بیشتر شون در حد تل باز کردن هست و مناسب گشتن در یوتوب و اینستا نیست )
اگه دنبال یه وی پی ان با کیفیت هستی ربات و استارت کن : 👇
🫐 @Lexonet_bot
با اینکه خیلی از سرویس ها و اپ های رایگان تو این شرایط طبق گفته کاربرا و اخبار قطع شدن ما همچنان قوی و پایدار وصلیم 😎
از جایی بخر که تو هر شرایطی وصله 👇
🫐 @Lexonet_bot
❤10❤🔥3👏3🔥3🙏2
Showing the 12 most recent of 23 posts we hold for @lexonet. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 16 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“کانال فروش فیلترشکن | لگزونت” (@lexonet), 142,593 subscribers as measured 8 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lexonet.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.