Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Лейла порешает

Channel

Лейла порешает

@leylareshala

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

6,971subscribers

-82 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001611987380
TypeChannel
Username@leylareshala
Created9 August 2023measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live1 September 2026
Measurements held11
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 1 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/leylareshala

Growth

6,9717,0537,0127 August 2026 — 7,053 subscribers7 August 2026 — 7,053 subscribers7 August 2026 — 7,052 subscribers10 August 2026 — 7,045 subscribers14 August 2026 — 7,042 subscribers17 August 2026 — 7,028 subscribers20 August 2026 — 7,017 subscribers24 August 2026 — 7,001 subscribers26 August 2026 — 6,986 subscribers29 August 2026 — 6,977 subscribers1 September 2026 — 6,971 subscribers7 August 20261 September 2026
11 measurements spanning 25 days, net -82. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,959–7,065 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
1 Sept 2026, 20:276,971-6
29 Aug 2026, 17:156,977-9
26 Aug 2026, 22:486,986-15
24 Aug 2026, 02:127,001-16
20 Aug 2026, 17:127,017-11
17 Aug 2026, 19:047,028-14
14 Aug 2026, 14:557,042-3
10 Aug 2026, 23:427,045-7
7 Aug 2026, 19:187,052-1
7 Aug 2026, 10:457,053no change
7 Aug 2026, 10:337,053first reading

Engagement

41 posts held, back to 31 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 12 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
11.0%
avg views ÷ 6,971 subscribers
Avg views / post
767
36 posts measured
Reaction rate
7.19%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
36
of 41 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 19 August 2026
Posts held41 (31 July 202619 August 2026)
Views total27,613
Reactions total1,986
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken20 Aug 2026, 02:45 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
4m 13s
Average length
25s

Measured directly from 10 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

2,366 reactions across 41 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤣73030.9%
58124.6%
💯56423.8%
🔥36815.6%
🤯702.96%
🥰261.10%
💔130.549%
😭50.211%
🕊40.169%
💋30.127%
🌚10.042%
🎉10.042%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 41 of the 41 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,366 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 41 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 19 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 41 we hold a reading for · 2%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @leylareshala. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 41 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 31 July 2026 to 19 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

19 Aug 2026, 19:38 UTC265 views26 reactionsread 20 August 2026

Балуюсь немного с этим вашим искусственным интеллектом По ощущениям я отстала лет на 10, потому что все еще пользуюсь обычным поисковиком и прямым вопросом к эксперту, а не отсылаю родинки в чат джипити (а могла бы догадаться!!!) Самое трудное в знакомстве это абсолютное непонимание что он вообще умеет делать и где эта граница технологического насилия? Нахожу пока прикольные промты и развлекаюсь, что-то очень удив

🔥139💯3🥰1

19 Aug 2026, 15:12 UTC404 views22 reactionsread 20 August 2026

Как я отношусь к таро, эзотерике и звездам? Да никак не отношусь, это все антинаучно!! Откажусь ли я узнать что меня ждёт по деньгам в этом месяце? Да никогда! Я еще из тех, кто карту дня ждёт, а то мне сейчас сюрпризы не нужны

9🔥5💯4🤣4

19 Aug 2026, 13:13 UTC475 views76 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

Мне еще очень нравится читать комментарии директора белевской пастилы Это коммент под видео, где парню не понравилась пастила 🤣 Позитивные отзывы на пастилу он тоже комментирует) Иногда нужно не смм нанимать, а просто подключить директору випиэн

🤣627💯7

19 Aug 2026, 12:47 UTC488 views38 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

Девочки, забирайте Я нашла с чем еще смешать эту херню Пастилу режу на кубики небольшие и смешиваю. Можно подождать пока они подружатся и пропитаются, но мне хочется быстрее все съесть и я не жду

25🔥11🥰2

19 Aug 2026, 12:18 UTC510 views43 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Video

Обращаюсь к высшим силам Имейте в виду, мне какой-то штрих не нужен, я люблю масиков пчелам выражаю благодарность 🙏

🤣365🔥2

17 Aug 2026, 17:33 UTC728 views55 reactionsread 20 August 2026

Меня сглазили или что? Прошу вернуть знак «!» на место немедленно! И пару икон еще в салон повесить Вчера самокат, сегодня две аварийные ситуации — лютые, просто ужасные. Описывать не буду, я слышала гибдд мониторят соц сети 🤣 Я правда бывает косячу на дорогах, много. Ну и как косячу? Проезжаю и потом понимаю, что надо было чуть по другому сделать, не тупить, или наоборот осмелеть. Но все это называется опыт, меня

🤣3613🔥6

17 Aug 2026, 12:59 UTC743 views29 reactionsread 20 August 2026

Скоро снова буду колоть ботокс Год назад делала, сначала прикола не поняла. Сейчас, когда он уже рассосался и я полистала свои фотки с прошлого года, рот свой закрываю, отлистываю купюры и иду колоться в лучших традициях косметологической наркомании Кто сейчас захотел написать в комментах зачем это мне, молодухе, или тоже озадачился этим вопросом, читайте мануал о ботоксе. Там все от и до и даже как выглядит когда

💯158🔥4🤣2

17 Aug 2026, 10:10 UTC736 views40 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

Подписчикам доброго полудня, остальным соболезную

🤣337

16 Aug 2026, 21:18 UTC788 views69 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

Ну и ладно. Пошли они нахер все Давайте лучше посмотрим как мне красиво помыли машину. Обожаю 😻 Сразу хочется нарядиться, прыгнуть в нее и на левый берег мотануть. А тонировка этааааа оооооо. Про нее уже отдельно напишу в максе. Мне нравится ворковать с постами дпс, приятные ребята, но они почему-то меня не останавливают в упор. Несколько раз такое уже было: еду, стоит целая группа, о! Я на них, они на меня, искра

🔥4515💯8🥰1

16 Aug 2026, 20:51 UTC760 views51 reactionsread 20 August 2026

И вообще я за рулем матерюсь как сапожник! Даже не знала, что так умею. В меня какая-то другая личность вселяется — дорожный Ростовский суккуб. Тут на юге — либо ты, либо тебя. До сегодняшнего дня я ездила с «!» знаком, мне многое сходило с рук)) Сегодня на работе решили, что хватит видимо их позорить и мне его сняли( Об этом мечтал наверное каждый, кто его видел. Помню попросила друга со мной поездить в самом нач

33💯10🤣8

16 Aug 2026, 20:18 UTC764 views74 reactionsread 20 August 2026

Ехала сейчас домой и чуть не сбила у себя на районе самокатистку Жалею о двух вещах сейчас: 1. Не работает видеорегистратор. Надо заняться картой памяти, потому что ту что я купила еще 3 месяца назад, он не читает 2. Я успела затормозить И впервые использовала звуковой сигнал. Мне хотелось ее прибить Она сначала обогнула переднюю машину и ушла вправо к обочине, я мысленно поблагодарила ее что не припятствует движе

💯659

16 Aug 2026, 09:08 UTC854 views62 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Forwarded from @la_seule_n

Человек каждый день приходит в храм, падает на колени и истово молится: — Господи, ну сделай так, чтобы я выиграл в лотерею! Я же всю жизнь верил тебе, помогал людям, ну неужели трудно?! Прошу тебя, дай мне выиграть главный приз! Проходит месяц, второй, год, два… Никакого выигрыша. Мужчина уже в отчаянии снова падает на колени и плачет: — Господи, я же так просил! Почему ты не помогаешь мне?! Вдруг над храмом раз

31💯24🔥7

Showing the 12 most recent of 41 posts we hold for @leylareshala. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 97,517 of 1,630,085 entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 1 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Лейла порешает” (@leylareshala), 6,971 subscribers as measured 1 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/leylareshala.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.