Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ИИ для HR и T&D | Лежнева Екатерина

Channel

ИИ для HR и T&D | Лежнева Екатерина

@lezhneva_ek

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Advertising · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

6,737subscribers

+73 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001923350672
TypeChannel
Username@lezhneva_ek
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 September 2026
Measurements held14
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/lezhneva_ek

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 96% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

6,6646,7496,706.56 August 2026 — 6,664 subscribers6 August 2026 — 6,665 subscribers10 August 2026 — 6,670 subscribers12 August 2026 — 6,693 subscribers16 August 2026 — 6,681 subscribers19 August 2026 — 6,666 subscribers23 August 2026 — 6,730 subscribers26 August 2026 — 6,734 subscribers28 August 2026 — 6,749 subscribers31 August 2026 — 6,734 subscribers3 September 2026 — 6,715 subscribers9 September 2026 — 6,729 subscribers13 September 2026 — 6,740 subscribers16 September 2026 — 6,737 subscribers6,7376 August 202616 September 2026
14 measurements spanning 41 days, net +73. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,651–6,762 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Sept 2026, 13:206,737-3
13 Sept 2026, 03:166,740+11
9 Sept 2026, 01:356,729+14
3 Sept 2026, 13:426,715-19
31 Aug 2026, 12:456,734-15
28 Aug 2026, 20:266,749+15
26 Aug 2026, 02:246,734+4
23 Aug 2026, 00:256,730+64
19 Aug 2026, 08:126,666-15
16 Aug 2026, 02:246,681-12
12 Aug 2026, 16:146,693+23
10 Aug 2026, 02:116,670+5
6 Aug 2026, 21:006,665+1
6 Aug 2026, 15:526,664first reading

Engagement

34 posts held, back to 13 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 10 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 34 posts for this entry, the most recent from 20 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

456 reactions across 32 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥19041.7%
👍14231.1%
6814.9%
378.11%
🤩102.19%
👏91.97%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 32 of the 34 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 456 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 34 most recent posts we hold, published 13 July 2026 to 20 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 33 we hold a reading for · 6%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @lezhneva_ek. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 34 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 13 July 2026 to 20 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Advertising

Ad load
8.82%
3 of 34 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
3
posts carrying an erid · 3 distinct tokens
Median views · ads
370
over 3 measured posts
Median views · rest
500
over 30 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.

Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
eridPostsFirst seenLast seen
2SDnje44XY7114 August 202614 August 2026
2SDnjehT26P16 August 20266 August 2026
2Vtzqvgmhfy119 August 202619 August 2026

A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.

Measured over the 34 most recent posts we hold, published 13 July 2026 to 20 August 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

20 Aug 2026, 05:02 UTC98 views2 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

⭐️Промокод на скидку! ”Начать использовать ИИ - это совсем не больно. Я думала, что мы сейчас будем код писать и всякие другие сложные вещи. А все оказалось так просто!” - сказала недавно одна из учащихся моего курса, HR-руководитель с большим опытом, но ранее не использовавшая ИИ совсем. Вообще, конечно ИИ - штука не простая. Но я стараюсь, особенно по началу, не грузить лишними терминами и идти постепенно от про

👍1🔥1

Signed Екатерина Лежнева ИИ для HR

19 Aug 2026, 09:58 UTC174 views6 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Advertisementerid 2VtzqvgmhfyPhoto

Бесплатный вебинар про развитие руководителей По данным Brimco, компании с продуманными программами развития руководителей в 12 раз чаще показывают сильные бизнес‑результаты. Исследование New Level Work подтверждает: 42% компаний фиксируют рост выручки благодаря таким программам. На вебинаре разберем, как выстроить систему развития менеджеров так, чтобы каждый час обучения конвертировался в результаты команды — и

👍2🔥21🤩1

Signed Kirill Lee

19 Aug 2026, 05:22 UTC213 views23 reactionsread 20 August 2026

🇨🇳Месяц с Kimi: китайская альтернатива Claude? Целый месяц я тестировала языковую модель Kimi. Взялась за неё, потому что увидела сходство с Claude и надеялась на меньшие ограничения. Делюсь честными итогами. ✅ Что реально понравилось - Работа с таблицами. Модель отлично анализирует данные, строит сводные и дашборды. Главное - она прописывает формулы, поэтому можно легко проверить, откуда взялись цифры. - П

👍14👏621

Signed Екатерина Лежнева ИИ для HR

18 Aug 2026, 05:19 UTC285 views7 reactionsread 20 August 2026

⚡️19 августа выступаю на Онлайн-конференции HR-КУХНИ и Talent Rocks — «АНТИХРУПКОЕ ОБУЧЕНИЕ 2026: Как HR и L&D помогают бизнесу выживать» Я выступаю в 14:45 с темой “Создание обучающего контента с ИИ: что еще фантастика, а что уже реальность” Расскажу вот про что: ✅Что умеют ИИ аватары и сколько они могут вам сэкономить? ✅Реально ли делать сразу длинные ролики с озвучкой? ✅Можно ли общаться с ботами и обучаться? ✅Л

🔥4👍3

Signed Екатерина Лежнева ИИ для HR

17 Aug 2026, 06:08 UTC301 views9 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Forwarded from @hrprosvet

Posted without readable text

🔥6👍21

Signed Екатерина Лежнева ИИ для HR

17 Aug 2026, 06:08 UTC273 viewsread 20 August 2026

Вот такое исследование я провела с Kimi.ai для @HRPROSVET

Signed Екатерина Лежнева ИИ для HR

14 Aug 2026, 05:04 UTC370 views6 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Advertisementerid 2SDnje44XY7Photo

Что делать, когда вы много вкладываете в обучение, а сотрудники продолжают работать по-старому? Это одна из главных проблем корпоративного обучения. Но хорошая новость в том, что ее можно решить. ⚪️ 18 августа в 16.00 по МСК добро пожаловать на вебинар "Тренинг завершен - начинается практика: как сделать применение знаний регулярным". На нем вы получите 5 четких правил эффективной организации посттренинга, чтобы д

👍2🔥211

Signed Kirill Lee

13 Aug 2026, 07:48 UTC383 views4 reactionsread 20 August 2026

🌞 Готовим ИИ-сани летом! Между первой встречей и стартом обучения часто проходит 3 месяца, а иногда и больше. Если хотите успеть обучить сотрудников работе с ИИ в этом году - предлагаю начинать планирование уже сейчас) 🤝 Чем я могу быть полезна: 🔹 Обучение для новичков (очно и онлайн). Для тех, кто пока мало знаком с ИИ, сопротивляется изменениям или не понимает, как применять нейросети в своих задачах 🔹 Продвинуто

11👍1🔥1

Signed Екатерина Лежнева ИИ для HR

12 Aug 2026, 17:08 UTC395 views17 reactionsread 20 August 2026

✅️Если вам полезен мой канал, вы его периодически читаете и узнаете что-то новое поо ИИ, буду рада вашей поддержке! Это могут сделать те, у кого есть премиум аккаунт и свободные голоса. Можно перейти по ссылке и проголосовать за канал ✅✅✅ https://t.me/boost/lezhneva_ek

8👍72

Signed Екатерина Лежнева ИИ для HR

12 Aug 2026, 08:56 UTC417 views13 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

📚 Интересная книга про ИИ Недавно я прочитала книгу “Мыслящие машины Дженсена Хуанга: История Nvidia и мировой ИИ-революции” Дженсон Хуанг - это основатель и бессменный CEO компании Nvidia. Изначально эта компания была известна как производитель видеокарт для игр, но именно благодаря визионерству Хуанга она превратилась в главного поставщика «железа» для обучения нейросетей и стала самой дорогой компанией в мире. Б

6🔥5👍2

Signed Екатерина Лежнева ИИ для HR

11 Aug 2026, 05:49 UTC364 views4 reactionsread 20 August 2026

⭐️Акция на обучение ИИ в августе! Курс “ИИ в работе HR” https://aihrlab.ru/ ⚡️Промокод 2026 на скидку 5000 рублей при оплате на сайте в августе ⚡️При оплате от юр. лица в августе — индивидуальная консультация в подарок 🤖 Чему вы научитесь на курсе «Искусственный интеллект в работе HR»? Не просто «попробуете нейросети», а научитесь использовать ИИ для реальных HR-задач. После курса вы сможете: 🔹 выбирать подходящие

👍2🔥2

Signed Екатерина Лежнева ИИ для HR

10 Aug 2026, 15:10 UTC387 views21 reactionsread 20 August 2026

🦄7 промптов, которые превратят нейросеть в вашего личного коуча Нейросеть - это не только генератор текстов. Это идеальный собеседник: без осуждения, доступен 24/7 и умеет задавать очень неудобные вопросы. Скопируй эти 7 промптов и используй вместо коуч-сессии 👇 🧠 1. Сократовский диалог Действуй как профессиональный коуч. Я хочу разобраться с [опиши проблему]. Задавай мне по одному глубокому вопросу за раз, чтобы

🔥14👍52

Signed Екатерина Лежнева ИИ для HR

Showing the 12 most recent of 34 posts we hold for @lezhneva_ek. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@lezhneva_ek edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
12 August 2026
Most recent edit
20 August 2026

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

21 Jul 2026, 05:56 UTCFinal Results54 voters

❗️Выбираем тему для открытого вебинара в августе! Друзья, в августе хочу провести вебинар про ИИ для всех желающих. Проголосуйте, пжл, какая тема вам была бы наиболее интересна?

  1. 5 HR-задач, которые ИИ сделает за вас за 5 минут22%
  2. Claude для HR:какие возможности есть50%
  3. ИИ для HR в 2026: что изменилось и что внедрять прямо сейчас28%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 34 most recent posts we hold, published 13 July 2026 to 20 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ИИ для HR и T&D | Лежнева Екатерина” (@lezhneva_ek), 6,737 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lezhneva_ek.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.