Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for LFG CALLS - BULL RUN

Channel

LFG CALLS - BULL RUN

@lfg_meme

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

46,844subscribers

-1,845 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002432950472
TypeChannel
Username@lfg_meme
DescriptionAll about crypto Chats - @memecall_chat - Call - Strategies - Tokens with low cap Strictly DYOR - Not financial advice!
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live5 September 2026
Measurements held28
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 5 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/lfg_meme

Growth

46,84448,68947,766.57 August 2026 — 48,689 subscribers7 August 2026 — 48,656 subscribers8 August 2026 — 48,580 subscribers9 August 2026 — 48,531 subscribers10 August 2026 — 48,437 subscribers11 August 2026 — 48,383 subscribers12 August 2026 — 48,290 subscribers13 August 2026 — 48,243 subscribers14 August 2026 — 48,184 subscribers16 August 2026 — 48,088 subscribers17 August 2026 — 48,008 subscribers18 August 2026 — 47,941 subscribers19 August 2026 — 47,882 subscribers20 August 2026 — 47,816 subscribers21 August 2026 — 47,764 subscribers22 August 2026 — 47,681 subscribers24 August 2026 — 47,578 subscribers25 August 2026 — 47,529 subscribers26 August 2026 — 47,454 subscribers27 August 2026 — 47,402 subscribers28 August 2026 — 47,353 subscribers29 August 2026 — 47,289 subscribers30 August 2026 — 47,204 subscribers31 August 2026 — 47,139 subscribers1 September 2026 — 47,089 subscribers2 September 2026 — 47,035 subscribers3 September 2026 — 46,960 subscribers5 September 2026 — 46,844 subscribers7 August 20265 September 2026
28 measurements spanning 29 days, net -1,845. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 46,567–48,966 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 28
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
5 Sept 2026, 08:5946,844-116
3 Sept 2026, 10:0646,960-75
2 Sept 2026, 07:3647,035-54
1 Sept 2026, 08:3647,089-50
31 Aug 2026, 07:3647,139-65
30 Aug 2026, 08:1547,204-85
29 Aug 2026, 10:1647,289-64
28 Aug 2026, 08:1447,353-49
27 Aug 2026, 09:3847,402-52
26 Aug 2026, 10:1147,454-75
25 Aug 2026, 12:4447,529-49
24 Aug 2026, 12:3647,578-103
22 Aug 2026, 19:0447,681-83
21 Aug 2026, 10:1447,764-52
20 Aug 2026, 12:2847,816-66
19 Aug 2026, 14:2247,882-59
18 Aug 2026, 12:3447,941-67
17 Aug 2026, 12:2348,008-80
16 Aug 2026, 04:3448,088-96
14 Aug 2026, 18:2848,184first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 21 November 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 64 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 February 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
680
Videos
13
Links
72

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
3m 01s
Average length
1m 00s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

3,592 reactions across 20 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 98.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥3,53298.3%
🤯601.67%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,592 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 21 November 2025 to 2 February 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

2 Feb 2026, 11:29 UTC≈11,600 views184 reactionsread 6 September 2026
Photo

Murad: the path from “MOVEMENTS” to “GEMS”. In July 2025, the portfolio stood at $67M. Today, only $9.1M remains. Down 86% and -$58M in six months. But don’t worry too much about Murad, he nicely unloaded from other wallets 😌

🔥178🤯6

29 Jan 2026, 15:58 UTC≈11,300 views203 reactionsread 6 September 2026
Photo

Buying the dip. Or maybe fuck it? 😹 For almost two years, I’ve been buying every single dump. Same phrases everywhere, every channel: “Buy when everyone is scared” “When there’s blood in the market, that’s the best time to make money” And honestly — that’s mostly bullshit. Will the market recover? Yeah, probably. But not everything. 99% of tokens exist just to get dumped on retail. And the other 1% gets pumped h

🔥202🤯1

20 Jan 2026, 07:41 UTC≈10,800 views171 reactionsread 6 September 2026
Photo

PUMP is no longer FUN, it’s Fund So basically, they decided to run a small IDO to fund devs — $3M total for 12 projects. And who are the judges? You. The audience. Your activity. Requirements are simple: launch a shitty token and show some activity — not for a dump (as they claim), but for a great future (yeah, sure). Long story short, the market is now betting on teams.

🔥170🤯1

19 Jan 2026, 13:47 UTC≈7,900 views203 reactionsread 6 September 2026
Photo

Already 200 requests. Another 100 and I’m deleting the link.

🔥202🤯1

19 Jan 2026, 13:31 UTC≈7,520 views171 reactionsread 6 September 2026

Here I’ll be sharing my wins on Polymarket and other prediction markets. https://t.me/+qOMiwAo3BKNkNzQ0

🔥171

19 Jan 2026, 10:43 UTC≈7,260 views187 reactionsread 6 September 2026
Photo

Trump Trump Trump I’m sure they’re just fitting the news to the events, people simply don’t have that many coins to push the order book up or down like that. All of this is conspiracy and HUMERU, in reality it’s just a shitty market and a manipulative swamp. When they want — we’ll fly in a week so hard that everyone will think it’s already too late to enter, then it’ll pump for another week and our hamster brain wi

🔥187

14 Jan 2026, 17:32 UTC≈8,020 views198 reactionsread 6 September 2026
Poll

Do you believe in a new meme season and an alt bull run?

  1. — Yes, this year — 100%62%
  2. — It won’t be like before anymore19%
  3. — It’ll be something else (a new trend)9%
  4. — Tokens aren’t going anywhere, they’ll just be in a different form10%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

🔥198

31 Dec 2025, 13:27 UTC≈9,430 views188 reactionsread 6 September 2026
Photo

Happy New Year, guys 🎄🐎 Despite the fact that expectations from crypto this year, to put it mildly, didn’t come true, there were still some wins! At least my channel is probably the only one in this fucked-up and shitty market that didn’t sell you VIPs, paid services, or other scams — but actually gave calls from which some of you managed to loot a couple of coins. Same plan for next year: if we find something that

🔥188

15 Dec 2025, 16:06 UTC≈9,730 views212 reactionsread 6 September 2026
Photo

Around $6.7B has been bridged to Solana this year. $4B comes from ETH alone.

🔥210🤯2

15 Dec 2025, 11:53 UTC≈9,340 views205 reactionsread 6 September 2026
Photo

No news = dump Good news = dump Bad news = dump Sell all = pump

🔥191🤯14

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @lfg_meme. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

14 Jan 2026, 17:32 UTCAnonymous Poll424 voters

Do you believe in a new meme season and an alt bull run?

  1. — Yes, this year — 100%62%
  2. — It won’t be like before anymore19%
  3. — It’ll be something else (a new trend)9%
  4. — Tokens aren’t going anywhere, they’ll just be in a different form10%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 21 November 2025 to 2 February 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“LFG CALLS - BULL RUN” (@lfg_meme), 46,844 subscribers as measured 5 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lfg_meme.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.