Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for id交易_888靓号_888号码_lianghao_yonghu_yonghuming_haoma_mingzi

Channel

id交易_888靓号_888号码_lianghao_yonghu_yonghuming_haoma_mingzi

@lianghaohaoma

2 usernames

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

71subscribers

-6 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001948395547
TypeChannel
Usernames@idomg @lianghaohaoma
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 September 2026
Measurements held10
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/lianghaohaoma

Growth

7177748 August 2026 — 77 subscribers9 August 2026 — 77 subscribers12 August 2026 — 75 subscribers17 August 2026 — 75 subscribers21 August 2026 — 74 subscribers24 August 2026 — 74 subscribers7 September 2026 — 73 subscribers8 September 2026 — 73 subscribers14 September 2026 — 71 subscribers15 September 2026 — 71 subscribers8 August 202615 September 2026
10 measurements spanning 38 days, net -6. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 70–78 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Sept 2026, 17:3771no change
14 Sept 2026, 15:5771-2
8 Sept 2026, 10:3873no change
7 Sept 2026, 08:4073-1
24 Aug 2026, 19:1674no change
21 Aug 2026, 02:5374-1
17 Aug 2026, 09:4875no change
12 Aug 2026, 21:4775-2
9 Aug 2026, 20:1777no change
8 Aug 2026, 10:4677first reading

Engagement

9 posts held, back to 9 January 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 9 posts for this entry, the most recent from 19 June 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

16 reactions across 5 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 62.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍1062.5%
637.5%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 16 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 9 January 2024 to 19 June 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

29 Jan 2024, 08:44 UTC≈4,230 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026

出两个明星用户名 @lizongsheng 李宗盛 @liangjingru 梁静茹

1

29 Jan 2024, 08:44 UTC≈4,110 views4 reactionsread 12 August 2026

@MM333 @hs888 @OT888 @mu888 @OT888 @ed888 @fashou 发售 @jiubie 久别 @tengge 腾哥 @beixing 北星 出售 喜欢私

👍4

25 Jan 2024, 02:14 UTC≈3,460 viewsread 12 August 2026

@QQvip 已出售 @OT888 已出售 @beixing 已出售 @ee000 已出售

9 Jan 2024, 15:48 UTC≈4,700 views5 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

❤️电报官方888虚拟号出售,不定时更新 🔥TG史上最牛逼最尊贵最安全最隐私的区块链NFT+888纸飞机靓号资产 可随时拍卖 转让 出售 永不销号 不受官方机制限制被举报不存在说会封号行为 无限发私信骚扰都没事 关键每一个号码都是单独的没有重复都是绝版🔥 🥳 TG电报官方靓号出售:👍 🥳+888 是您尊贵身份的象征,👍 🥳防双向,防注销,防盗号👍 🥳官方号码永久使用,永不过期👍 🥳+888 可选随机号码,价格实惠👍 🥳业务号码不再担心过期被收回👍 888虚拟号是什么? 888虚拟号是电报官方发行的NFT,用于电报接验证码,可随时拍卖,可永久使用 88虚拟号会被注销吗? 888虚拟号不容易被注销,假如账号违规只会注销账号而不会注销888虚拟号,可无限制反复使用 😪 Telegram官方 永久匿名+888 手机号 好处: 官方永久区块链手机号码(永久接码) 在TG上做业务彭显尊贵 永久财产,不会被回收❤️ 感兴

4👍1

9 Jan 2024, 15:33 UTC≈4,210 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

所有 用户名均为出售 感兴趣私聊 @jinyi

1

Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @lianghaohaoma. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“id交易_888靓号_888号码_lianghao_yonghu_yonghuming_haoma_mingzi” (@lianghaohaoma), 71 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lianghaohaoma.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.