https://t.me/caifa6688
Channel
连接分享
@lianjie00
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
53subscribers
-3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001804971864 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @lianjie00 |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 12 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/lianjie00 |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Sept 2026, 07:16 | 53 | -1 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 03:59 | 54 | -2 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 07:45 | 56 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 10:34 | 56 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 12 April 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 22 April 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
15 reactions across 2 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 5 | 33.3% | |
| ❤ | 4 | 26.7% | |
| 😁 | 3 | 20.0% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 6.67% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 6.67% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 6.67% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 15 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 12 April 2023 to 22 April 2023, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
https://t.me/szshuiguo111 https://t.me/YUE551 https://t.me/shenzhenxiuche8 https://t.me/xiuchedadu https://t.me/GSaiyu https://t.me/P541888888 https://t.me/waiweiziy https://t.me/szlxy122 https://t.me/ssfff078 https://t.me/MutualPeople https://t.me/loufengziyuan https://t.me/danbao_cn https://t.me/danbao_hk https://t.me/zzaa9455 https://t.me/dabiaoge8899 https://t.me/szdidi https://t.me/lailai666666 https://t.me/Nans…
❤3😁3👍2👏1🔥1🥰1
https://t.me/szshuiguo111 https://t.me/YUE551 https://t.me/shenzhenxiuche8 https://t.me/xiuchedadu https://t.me/GSaiyu https://t.me/P541888888 https://t.me/waiweiziy https://t.me/szlxy122 https://t.me/ssfff078 https://t.me/MutualPeople https://t.me/loufengziyuan https://t.me/danbao_cn https://t.me/danbao_hk https://t.me/zzaa9455 https://t.me/dabiaoge8899 https://t.me/szdidi https://t.me/lailai666666 https://t.me/Nans…
👍3❤1
https://t.me/futiangaowa
https://t.me/FHMAKA22
https://t.me/Chuibiqun666
https://t.me/sxy68899
https://t.me/lsjdda
https://t.me/szlxy122
https://t.me/P541888888
https://t.me/GsShangKe
https://t.me/aaaszcha
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @lianjie00. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@Chuibiqun666 · 16,7673 posts深圳吃瓜聊天群
@futiangaowa · 4,8443 posts深圳嫩茶会馆
@nenmei1 · 31,8763 posts天坑少年🎉从此修车不迷路
@P541888888 · 14,3693 posts深圳【搽】
@cvzfxdhg1 · 19,7462 posts广深&苏州扫雷大队2
@danbao_cn · 22,6632 posts深圳狼🐺群
@gaoduanwaiweihuiz · 20,5772 posts广佛深修车QM外围密约💋💋
@gfsqmmy1 · 22,4232 posts全国莞式全套会所
@GM9600 · 32 posts全国莞式海选会所
@gsaiyu · 3642 posts深圳修车《总群》
@jiche111 · 33,4602 posts深圳【探花】 😍
@loufengdq · 33,3362 posts👧深圳南山-乘风破浪🚀
@Nanshanali666 · 18,2462 posts扫雷大队-苏州
@saolei_sapper · 11,2102 posts🥇广深🚕好司机车队
@shenzhenlangqun · 17,6622 posts深圳派对|Shenzhen Party
@shenzhenparty · 28,8682 posts深圳私约修车团2群
@shenzhenxiuche8 · 11,1232 posts深圳新月论坛楼凤交流群
@shenzlf · 20,4342 posts深圳惠州东莞全区 修车大队
@ssfff078 · 26,8612 posts广州深圳商务学院
@sxy68899 · 2,5252 posts《楚汉阁全拼:@chuhange》全国选妃
@sz366 · 3272 posts🍺深圳吃喝玩乐聊天群🍺
@szchihewanle · 20,5432 posts深圳乐逍遥
@szlxy122 · 28,0192 posts深圳刘亦菲在线接单
@TVB0001 · 3242 posts
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 16
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 16
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@lianjie00 named 16 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 2 posts, 11 August 2026 – 11 August 2026
named in 2 posts, 11 August 2026 – 11 August 2026
named in 2 posts, 11 August 2026 – 11 August 2026
named in 2 posts, 11 August 2026 – 11 August 2026
named in 2 posts, 11 August 2026 – 11 August 2026
named in 2 posts, 11 August 2026 – 11 August 2026
named in 2 posts, 11 August 2026 – 11 August 2026
named in 2 posts, 11 August 2026 – 11 August 2026
named in 2 posts, 11 August 2026 – 11 August 2026
named in 1 post, 11 August 2026 – 11 August 2026
named in 1 post, 11 August 2026 – 11 August 2026
named in 1 post, 11 August 2026 – 11 August 2026
named in 1 post, 11 August 2026 – 11 August 2026
named in 1 post, 11 August 2026 – 11 August 2026
named in 1 post, 11 August 2026 – 11 August 2026
named in 1 post, 11 August 2026 – 11 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“连接分享” (@lianjie00), 53 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lianjie00.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.