Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Library of Atlantis (Research Channel)

Channel

Library of Atlantis (Research Channel)

@library_of_atlantis

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

550subscribers

+2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001806714830
TypeChannel
Username@library_of_atlantis
Created4 January 2023measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live4 September 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 4 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/library_of_atlantis

Growth

548555551.57 August 2026 — 548 subscribers8 August 2026 — 548 subscribers15 August 2026 — 552 subscribers22 August 2026 — 555 subscribers4 September 2026 — 550 subscribers5507 August 20264 September 2026
5 measurements spanning 28 days, net +2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 547–556 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
4 Sept 2026, 03:02550-5
22 Aug 2026, 03:17555+3
15 Aug 2026, 18:48552+4
8 Aug 2026, 03:46548no change
7 Aug 2026, 14:33548first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 4 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 31 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

22 reactions across 9 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍940.9%
418.2%
313.6%
👏29.09%
🤔29.09%
🥴29.09%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 22 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 4 July 2026 to 31 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

31 Jul 2026, 08:15 UTC135 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Sand is a hoax Nobody seems to know how sand is formed or how it gets a red iron oxide coating. One guess is that it somehow comes from Mars. https://x.com/controscience/status/1195366848050544640?s=20

🥴2🤔1

29 Jul 2026, 11:33 UTC154 viewsread 8 August 2026

Electricity is also a hoax https://library-of-atlantis.com/2024/10/18/what-is-electricity/

29 Jul 2026, 11:31 UTC122 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026

https://library-of-atlantis.com/2023/11/16/the-phantom-leaf-effect/

👍2

29 Jul 2026, 11:30 UTC124 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Capacitors are a hoax Common wisdom says that a capacitor works by accumulating charge on two conductive plates either side of an insulator. This video proves that no such thing occurs but that some sort of energy is stored in the glass itself. Glass is an insulating material and so the energy is not in the form of flowing electrons. This is the same mechanism as the phantom leaf effect I think. https://www.you

1

29 Jul 2026, 09:49 UTC121 viewsread 8 August 2026

Chain fountain slow motion Slow the video down even more to see segments of chain 'preparing' to rise Anti-gravity effect? https://youtu.be/6ukMId5fIi0?t=268

29 Jul 2026, 09:48 UTC118 viewsread 8 August 2026

Steve Mould's chain fountain The peak falls and rises with ease The loop maintains its shape as the chain runs through it Chain segments seem to rise before they need to https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_dQJBBklpQQ

26 Jul 2026, 13:26 UTC135 viewsread 8 August 2026

The double slit experiment The unified electromagnetic field model of Meyl seems sufficient to explain the results seen in the double-slit experiment. There is no need for quantum indeterminacy, human consciousness or any sort of instantaneous action at a distance, spooky or otherwise. Abstract: The provided content explores a unified field model to explain the results of the double-slit experiment, suggesting tha

19 Jul 2026, 14:14 UTC224 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Interpreting Newton's second Law Newton's second Law is often described as the Foundations of Physics but closer examination finds it to be an ill-defined concept devoid of any real meaning. AI summary: The proposed structure for theoretical physics posits that ‘Reality’ is subject to measurement and interpretation through a mathematical framework. It argues that fundamental concepts like force, mass, and accelerat

1

19 Jul 2026, 12:21 UTC160 views0 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Certainly. Electric fields are in a state of constant movement; there is no such thing as a static field. A toroidal field is therefore in a continual state of movement. To visualise such a movement imagine a tornado. Matter and energy are sucked inwards and then moved upwards and outwards. "Information is the physical structure of a scalar wave" - Meyl We don't know much about the structure of these waves except

19 Jul 2026, 12:20 UTC126 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Could you please, clarify the connection between the electric field being toroidal and this fact giving the unit of protein(s) the characteristics of transducer/accumulator of information? Is this relationship applicable at every level? If so, the human body-mind system will be / act on its own as an autonomous unit a transducer/accumulator of information… The same with our - and every other - planet. Units of tra

19 Jul 2026, 09:49 UTC126 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Podkletnov 's anti-gravity machine This experiment is mentioned by Meyl I think and is therefore to be taken seriously. If we accept that gravity is an electromagnetic phenomenon with a fine grained structure round about the size of an atom, then in looking for anti-gravity effects we expect to find that disturbances of this field could be caused by rapidly spinning or vibrating objects or electromagnetic fields at

👍2

19 Jul 2026, 09:42 UTC158 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

The electric fields surrounding proteins are toroidal and will act as accumulators/transducers for energy and information https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:The_electrostatic_field_lines_of_TRAP,_trp_RNA_binding_attenuation_protein_(PDB_ID,_2EXS).jpg

2

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @library_of_atlantis. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

CBSE Class 12th Boards
@CBSEClass12_Boards · 56,585
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 51 here — alongside 50 others — read 23 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Library of Atlantis (Research Channel)” (@library_of_atlantis), 550 subscribers as measured 4 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/library_of_atlantis.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.