Channel
@libraryforblind
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Referenced elsewhere · Cite this entry
554subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001472524490 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @libraryforblind |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 4 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 4 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/libraryforblind |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 4 Sept 2026, 01:18 | 554 | -1 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 10:12 | 555 | +1 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 11:06 | 554 | -3 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 05:56 | 557 | +1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 18:17 | 556 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 04:49 | 556 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 3 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
77 reactions across 18 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 53.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 41 | 53.2% | |
| 🔥 | 7 | 9.09% | |
| ✍ | 6 | 7.79% | |
| 👀 | 6 | 7.79% | |
| 🐳 | 4 | 5.19% | |
| 👏 | 3 | 3.90% | |
| 😱 | 3 | 3.90% | |
| 🤯 | 3 | 3.90% | |
| 🤡 | 2 | 2.60% | |
| ❤🔥 | 1 | 1.30% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 1.30% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 77 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 3 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Сегодня #спервойстроки мы с вами прочитали книгу «Служба доставки книг» немецкого писателя Карстена Себастиана Хенна (Carsten Sebastian Henn)! Кстати, эту книгу порекомендовала Алёна из отдела обслуживания:) Вот заметка от неё: Призвание главного героя Карла Кольхоффа подбирать книги для читателей. Каждый день он приносит их тем, чьи имена давно заменил на прозвища героев разных книг. Размеренные будни нарушает дев…
✍2❤1🐳1
Читаем?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
❤2
#спервойстроки Говорят, книги сами находят своих читателей, но иногда им нужен кто-то, кто укажет путь. Так было и в этот августовский день в книжной лавке, носившей название «У городских ворот». Правда, городские ворота, или, вернее, их остатки, которые большинство горожан считали дерзким произведением искусства, находились в добрых трех кварталах отсюда. Книжный магазин был старый, он достраивался и рос в течение…
❤2❤🔥1🔥1
Какая книга скрывается за отзывами? С какими отзывами вы согласны?😢
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
❤2
Как насчёт новых отрицательных отзывов с сайта LiveLib? #вынеповерите Угадываем, о каком произведении идет речь и выбираем правильный ответ в голосовалке ниже! (мы сохранили авторские орфографию и пунктуацию в отзывах) «30% книги это очень много, чтобы понять о чем сюжет и понять хочется ли тебе читать дальше. Ну так вот, о чем сюжет я не поняла и читать дальше не хочется. Персонажи оч картонные и не вызывают ника…
❤1
Какая книга скрывается за отзывами? С какими отзывами вы согласны?🙂
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Отрицательные отзывы с сайта LiveLib принесли! #вынеповерите Угадываем, о каком произведении идет речь и выбираем правильный ответ в голосовалке ниже! (мы сохранили авторские орфографию и пунктуацию в отзывах) «Реквием ведра с крабами. Есть такая штука— «теория ведра с крабами». Если вкратце, она гласит, что крабы — настолько глупые животные, что по одиночке каждый из них легко бы выбрался из ведра, но когда один …
❤1
В июле у книжных пятниц отпуск, так что встречи не будет!🥱 Но в августе мы соберемся, чтобы поговорить об одном из самых известных романов американской литературы «Убить пересмешника» Харпер Ли🌸 #книжнаяпятница Переломная эпоха для юга Америки прошлого века, где чернокожего мужчину обвиняют в насилии над белой девушкой. Эта история о громком судебном процессе, рассказанная маленькой девятилетней девочкой Джин Луиз…
❤5✍1👀1
Какая книга скрывается за отзывами? С какими отзывами вы согласны?👽
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
👀2
Вот и отрицательные отзывы с сайта LiveLib!👩🍳 #вынеповерите Угадываем, о каком произведении идет речь и выбираем правильный ответ в голосовалке ниже! (мы сохранили авторские орфографию и пунктуацию в отзывах) «Книгу не ругаю, я ее даже хвалю. Тогда, в том далеком году, когда книга была издана, это произведение выглядело однозначно изюминкой. Оно и сейчас не просроченное, нет. Но надо быть честным, оцениваю я, исх…
😱2❤1😁1
Как литература великой империи пережила переход от золотого века к эпохе катастроф? На лекции мы пройдем путь длиной в пять столетий – от изящных стихов эпохи расцвета до текстов, заложивших фундамент новой европейской цивилизации👼 #прочитайте Политический кризис империи отразился на упадке художественной поэзии. В это время на первый план выходит богословие, риторика и история. В литературе рождается принципиально…
❤6🔥4✍3
«Как продать слона» Ася Барышева Основу любого бизнеса составляет умение общаться с клиентами. Ася Барышева покажет, как найти подход даже к самому равнодушному покупателю – даст принципы, инструменты и техники, чтобы выбирать правильную тактику на каждом этапе сделки. Успешными продавцами не рождаются, ими становятся.
❤4👏3🔥2
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @libraryforblind. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 6 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Читаем?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Какая книга скрывается за отзывами? С какими отзывами вы согласны?😢
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Какая книга скрывается за отзывами? С какими отзывами вы согласны?🙂
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Какая книга скрывается за отзывами? С какими отзывами вы согласны?👽
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Какая книга скрывается за отзывами? С какими отзывами вы согласны?
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Какая книга скрывается за отзывами? С какими отзывами вы согласны?👁
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 3 July 2026 to 6 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
This handle named by sources this register does not control and did not measure — each shown exactly as found, attributed by name, dated to when it was read.
Wikipedia
One Wikipedia article names this handle in its article text, found by searching for a t.me link inside the article source. A citation is a notability signal, not a verification: nobody here confirmed the cited post is genuine or still says what the article quotes. Article text is CC BY-SA 4.0, Wikipedia contributors; snippets below are short excerpts.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Библиотека Точки Зрения” (@libraryforblind), 554 subscribers as measured 4 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/libraryforblind.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.