Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Обитель Криптанов

Channel

Обитель Криптанов

@ligakriptanov

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

202subscribers

-5 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002023771353
TypeChannel
Username@ligakriptanov
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/ligakriptanov

Growth

202207204.56 August 2026 — 207 subscribers7 August 2026 — 207 subscribers12 August 2026 — 205 subscribers18 August 2026 — 206 subscribers26 August 2026 — 204 subscribers11 September 2026 — 203 subscribers19 September 2026 — 202 subscribers6 August 202619 September 2026
7 measurements spanning 44 days, net -5. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 201–208 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 12:58202-1
11 Sept 2026, 05:37203-1
26 Aug 2026, 10:04204-2
18 Aug 2026, 23:47206+1
12 Aug 2026, 20:37205-2
7 Aug 2026, 03:47207no change
6 Aug 2026, 08:36207first reading

Engagement

14 posts held, back to 9 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

8 reactions across 7 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🕊450.0%
👍225.0%
😁112.5%
😭112.5%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 8 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 9 July 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 13:07 UTC19 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @xgiftnewsruPhoto

🎁 Передаём эстафету Привет, коллекционеры! У нас важная новость: xGift завершает свою работу. Мы прошли с вами большой путь — от первых закрытых тест-версий проекта до полноценного маркетплейса и агрегатора Telegram-подарков, и всё это время рынок подарков рос быстрее, чем кто-либо ожидал. 🤝 Всё лучшее — в надёжные руки Мы решили не распыляться, а передать наши наработки лидеру рынка — Gates Market. Туда переезжаю

Signed Киви

29 Jul 2026, 08:20 UTC64 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

РФ объявили Дурова в международный розыск

😭1

28 Jul 2026, 20:24 UTC50 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @randomgiftstPhoto

Охуенко показал над какими моделями они сейчас работают 🤩 какую ждете больше всего?

👍1

27 Jul 2026, 12:55 UTC53 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Провальные очки Durovs. В моменте, когда были выпущены данные очки с тиражом в 5к подарков и ценой 30к звезд (640$ примерно), казалось, что предложение максимально выгодное и цена достойная. Теперь после их улучшения цена может варьироваться от 200$. Подобный провал сложно было представить. Подобные случаи были со шлемами, папахами, но чтобы так..Следим за продолжением падения цены.. Еще даже не улучшена половина под

🕊1

27 Jul 2026, 09:28 UTC58 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

На фоне недоступности xrocket STBL подскочил на 50% в цене

🕊1

24 Jul 2026, 13:29 UTC65 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

+2к GRAM и STBL снова начнет идти в рост. Если только новый ордер на продажу не поставят. На бирже монет под 30к$

16 Jul 2026, 16:59 UTC59 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @rivolresearchPhoto

How TON Foundation extracted $4.66M through RSquad From Jan 17, 2025 to Jun 19, 2026 TON Foundation sent at least $4.66M to one public RSquad wallet: $2.64M USDT and 1.25M GRAM worth $2.022M when transferred. Earlier addresses and connected wallets are not included. TON Foundation repeated one cycle three times: when an RSquad product failed to launch, stopped updating, or left TON infrastructure, the same team rec

13 Jul 2026, 11:10 UTC55 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @tonstatus

Mainnet shard processing slowdown Block production and message processing in workchain shards are currently experiencing a slowdown. The TON Core team is aware of this issue and is working to resolve it.

13 Jul 2026, 03:14 UTC59 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @OHUENKOchatSticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

12 Jul 2026, 05:51 UTC100 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

EVAA в моменте дала заработать самым стойким

10 Jul 2026, 09:26 UTC81 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Экосистема развивается. Инфлы зарабатывают на рефералах,как могут 😂 В целом давно уже понимал,что лучшие времена позади,но чтобы настолько..

🕊1😁1

Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @ligakriptanov. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Gramgochi канал
@tongochi_ru · 96,332
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 22 August 2026
degenerative space
@degenerativespace · 38,791
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 30 August 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Обитель Криптанов” (@ligakriptanov), 202 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ligakriptanov.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.