Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for LIGLEY BEST

Channel

LIGLEY BEST

@ligleybest

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

5,543subscribers

-203 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002133163929
TypeChannel
Username@ligleybest
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live5 November 2026
Measurements held24
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 5 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/ligleybest

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 62% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

5,5435,7485,645.57 August 2026 — 5,746 subscribers7 August 2026 — 5,742 subscribers10 August 2026 — 5,739 subscribers13 August 2026 — 5,748 subscribers16 August 2026 — 5,744 subscribers19 August 2026 — 5,733 subscribers22 August 2026 — 5,731 subscribers25 August 2026 — 5,726 subscribers28 August 2026 — 5,706 subscribers31 August 2026 — 5,714 subscribers4 September 2026 — 5,702 subscribers9 September 2026 — 5,687 subscribers13 September 2026 — 5,682 subscribers17 September 2026 — 5,675 subscribers27 September 2026 — 5,649 subscribers5 October 2026 — 5,630 subscribers12 October 2026 — 5,620 subscribers18 October 2026 — 5,610 subscribers21 October 2026 — 5,609 subscribers24 October 2026 — 5,597 subscribers28 October 2026 — 5,577 subscribers30 October 2026 — 5,571 subscribers2 November 2026 — 5,558 subscribers5 November 2026 — 5,543 subscribers7 August 20265 November 2026
24 measurements spanning 90 days, net -203. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,512–5,779 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 24
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
5 Nov 2026, 12:115,543-15
2 Nov 2026, 16:555,558-13
30 Oct 2026, 14:595,571-6
28 Oct 2026, 00:565,577-20
24 Oct 2026, 14:055,597-12
21 Oct 2026, 10:475,609-1
18 Oct 2026, 13:595,610-10
12 Oct 2026, 10:205,620-10
5 Oct 2026, 11:165,630-19
27 Sept 2026, 06:365,649-26
17 Sept 2026, 19:175,675-7
13 Sept 2026, 16:595,682-5
9 Sept 2026, 16:015,687-15
4 Sept 2026, 06:185,702-12
31 Aug 2026, 08:435,714+8
28 Aug 2026, 10:255,706-20
25 Aug 2026, 19:325,726-5
22 Aug 2026, 23:265,731-2
19 Aug 2026, 23:285,733-11
16 Aug 2026, 18:355,744first reading

Engagement

22 posts held, back to 16 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 22 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

1,014 reactions across 22 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤33933.4%
👍25224.9%
❤‍🔥15114.9%
🔥10210.1%
👎474.64%
😱363.55%
👌262.56%
🥰201.97%
🎉111.08%
🤔80.789%
😁60.592%
😐60.592%
👏50.493%
💘10.099%
🖕10.099%
🤣10.099%
🤩10.099%
🤮10.099%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 22 of the 22 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,014 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 16 July 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 22 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ligleybest. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 22 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 16 July 2026 to 10 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

10 Aug 2026, 15:25 UTC≈1,290 views131 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

вот это прикол,смотреть этот кал не советую. ЛУЧШЕ ПОСМОТРИМ У МЕНЯ НА ТВИЧЕ 😎 Не давайте им просмотры пожалуйста

❤113🤔8👎4👍3🔥2😱1

8 Aug 2026, 10:01 UTC≈1,520 views100 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Спасибо всем за поздравления, вот такой Даша торт подарила 😮‍💨

❤‍🔥75🎉11🔥6🥰4❤1👍1👎1👏1

4 Aug 2026, 10:16 UTC≈2,700 views26 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

НОВОЕ ВИДЕО!!! http://youtube.com/post/UgkxHjZbdiI06sQEOS3VF9-MEs6ZIBv06uRc?si=0F82NAeRuEfZ7dEV

❤23👍2👎1

2 Aug 2026, 16:10 UTC≈2,860 views18 reactionsread 12 August 2026

СТАРТУЕМ https://www.twitch.tv/ligley_best

🔥16👍2

2 Aug 2026, 11:03 UTC≈2,350 views33 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Стрим в 19:00 - посмотрим видосы и пообщаемся 🥴

👍30❤2👎1

1 Aug 2026, 17:18 UTC≈2,080 views45 reactionsread 12 August 2026

идем в роблокс со зрителями

😱33👎5👏4👍1🔥1🖕1

1 Aug 2026, 16:07 UTC≈2,060 views20 reactionsread 12 August 2026

СТАРТУЕМ https://www.twitch.tv/ligley_best

🔥16❤2👍1👎1

1 Aug 2026, 13:03 UTC≈2,190 views40 reactionsread 12 August 2026

https://youtu.be/3LUvfXYhg4w?is=ExNbJerk1bPaYZM7

❤28👎7👍2😱2🥰1

1 Aug 2026, 11:47 UTC≈2,220 views19 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Стрим в 19:00 посмотрим видосы и поиграем со зрителями в роблокс 😐

👍16❤1👎1🥰1

1 Aug 2026, 08:54 UTC≈1,990 views43 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Скоро новое видео, хоррор в стиле волка и красной шапки ☺️ давно такого не было

❤38👍2👎1🤩1🥰1

31 Jul 2026, 21:13 UTC≈2,180 views40 reactionsread 12 August 2026

https://youtu.be/6m76e1XMwIQ

👍37❤1👎1🥰1

30 Jul 2026, 14:20 UTC≈2,110 views35 reactionsread 12 August 2026

https://youtu.be/rr4ydOs-hPo?si=SS05JZQ1L_CQRf6W

❤32👍1💘1🥰1

Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @ligleybest. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 4 posts on @ligleybest as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
8 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
8 August 2026
Median time before seen missing
3 days
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

RAZOPLAY
@razoplay · 20,009
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 46 here — alongside 45 others — read 27 September 2026
😈 OfficialZelel
@zelelgames · 39,453
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 30 August 2026
DRЫNDA's Mod
@DRbINDA_YT · 36,244
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 31 August 2026
• Gerand •
@gerandtv · 51,766
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 24 August 2026
Фордел
@frdll_yt · 32,640
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 3 September 2026
Holy Baam
@holybaam_live · 80,986
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 18 August 2026
Бункер Князича
@knyaz1ch · 44,112
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 27 August 2026
Dачник
@daa4nik · 64,679
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 29 August 2026
DH Animation
@dhanimation · 45,280
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 27 August 2026
Red Cat 🔻
@redcat_official · 27,269
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 11 September 2026
ROBLOX
@robloxers · 34,380
Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 8 September 2026

This channel appears in 11 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“LIGLEY BEST” (@ligleybest), 5,543 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ligleybest.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.