Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 𐌡ᥙκʙᥙдᥲцᥙя ᧐ᴦρᥲ

Channel

𐌡ᥙκʙᥙдᥲцᥙя ᧐ᴦρᥲ

@likwid_ogra

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Cite this entry

7,153subscribers

+175 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002424935784
TypeChannel
Username@likwid_ogra
DescriptionПо рекламе пишите в сообщения канала или админам чата.
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live4 November 2026
Measurements held23
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 4 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/likwid_ogra

Topic

Adult — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 68% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

6,9737,1537,0637 August 2026 — 6,978 subscribers7 August 2026 — 6,978 subscribers10 August 2026 — 6,977 subscribers13 August 2026 — 6,979 subscribers16 August 2026 — 6,981 subscribers19 August 2026 — 6,974 subscribers22 August 2026 — 6,991 subscribers26 August 2026 — 6,986 subscribers28 August 2026 — 6,977 subscribers1 September 2026 — 6,973 subscribers5 September 2026 — 6,986 subscribers13 September 2026 — 6,985 subscribers18 September 2026 — 6,987 subscribers27 September 2026 — 7,017 subscribers5 October 2026 — 7,019 subscribers11 October 2026 — 7,030 subscribers15 October 2026 — 7,023 subscribers18 October 2026 — 7,031 subscribers20 October 2026 — 7,048 subscribers23 October 2026 — 7,043 subscribers27 October 2026 — 7,127 subscribers30 October 2026 — 7,149 subscribers1 November 2026 — 7,153 subscribers7 August 20261 November 2026
23 measurements spanning 86 days, net +175. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,946–7,180 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 23
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
1 Nov 2026, 21:117,153+4
30 Oct 2026, 07:217,149+22
27 Oct 2026, 02:597,127+84
23 Oct 2026, 17:477,043-5
20 Oct 2026, 22:597,048+17
18 Oct 2026, 02:567,031+8
15 Oct 2026, 00:367,023-7
11 Oct 2026, 16:177,030+11
5 Oct 2026, 14:397,019+2
27 Sept 2026, 17:577,017+30
18 Sept 2026, 12:186,987+2
13 Sept 2026, 20:206,985-1
5 Sept 2026, 02:386,986+13
1 Sept 2026, 01:596,973-4
28 Aug 2026, 18:176,977-9
26 Aug 2026, 03:166,986-5
22 Aug 2026, 20:236,991+17
19 Aug 2026, 09:246,974-7
16 Aug 2026, 19:436,981+2
13 Aug 2026, 08:376,979first reading

Engagement

72 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 16 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
61.1%
avg views ÷ 7,153 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,370
21 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.36%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
21
of 72 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 November 2026
Posts held72 (4 August 2026 – 4 November 2026)
Views total91,770
Reactions total3,082
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken5 Nov 2026, 14:06 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈1,350
Videos
≈2,050
Links
≈1,510

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 5 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
3h 08m
Average length
2m 49s

Measured directly from 67 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

7,934 reactions across 72 posts, in 28 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤣2,62233.0%
custom 540670314372976959091211.5%
custom 519087840429081380582710.4%
custom 54499016413251037247699.69%
🔥5747.23%
🤡4575.76%
🤮4005.04%
custom 63255703797712832092943.71%
custom 53707821804547255012483.13%
custom 53710420173861765661792.26%
custom 52831352252268854401441.81%
💊1291.63%
🍾891.12%
custom 5337197370151020933710.895%
👍420.529%
💯410.517%
custom 5238130663818797192350.441%
❤‍🔥210.265%
custom 5402607681959652170180.227%
🍌140.176%
8 further kinds480.605%

Custom emoji. 10 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 72 of the 72 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 7,934 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 72 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 4 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
5
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 72 we hold a reading for · 1%
Most on one post
5
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @likwid_ogra. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 72 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 August 2026 to 4 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 13 of 21 posts held from the last 30 days (61.9%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

4 Nov 2026, 23:19 UTC≈2,790 views131 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Video

Смотрите сами понос кипяченой свиньи 🙏 😃 Самый горячий антик 🔥 💬 Самое горячее общение 💬

💊64🤣22🤡13custom 519087840429081380511custom 54067031437297695908custom 54499016413251037247custom 63255703797712832096

3 Nov 2026, 21:55 UTC≈3,560 views112 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Video

Вы зачем опять довели Кучу? 😃 Самый горячий антик 🔥 💬 Самое горячее общение 💬

🤣63custom 544990164132510372417custom 632557037977128320917custom 54067031437297695906custom 53710420173861765665custom 51908784042908138053👍1

3 Nov 2026, 11:29 UTC≈3,640 views100 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Video

Послушаем брехню про Лёху? 😃 Самый горячий антик 🔥 💬 Самое горячее общение 💬

🤡56custom 540670314372976959021🤮12custom 54499016413251037246custom 63255703797712832093🤣2

2 Nov 2026, 17:31 UTC≈3,760 views147 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Video

Благородная Куча не общается со Степкой, чтоб лишний раз не трепать себе и ему нервы 🤩 Была мысль пойти в сад за ребёнком, но она быстро улетучилась 🙄 😃 Самый горячий антик 🔥 💬 Самое горячее общение 💬

🤣95custom 544990164132510372418custom 519087840429081380514🔥6🍾5custom 54067031437297695905custom 63255703797712832093custom 53710420173861765661

2 Nov 2026, 13:38 UTC≈3,740 views109 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Video

Свинья закипела и жалуется одному пидору на другого 🤣 😃 Самый горячий антик 🔥 💬 Самое горячее общение 💬

🤣68🤡20🤮11custom 53710420173861765665custom 63255703797712832095

1 Nov 2026, 12:29 UTC≈4,270 views250 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Video

🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 🤩〰〰〰〰〰〰 . 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 🤩🤩🤩 🔥 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩〰〰〰〰〰 〰〰〰〰〰 🤩 Ну что , аписики🖤 В этой части остается только рукоплескать свинячей фантазии 😬 Чего вы только не услышите в этом видеоряде.. Отдельный вопрос : как можно было так ужраться , что даже не услышать , как забирают твоего ребенка , как можно не почувствовать , что тебя будят?! 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 😶 🤩🤩 🤩🤩 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 Спивайся , сучка 〰 😃 Самый горячий антик 🔥 💬 Самое гор

🔥190👍21custom 519087840429081380519custom 544990164132510372411👏8custom 53710420173861765661

Signed Nastya Resnyanskaya

1 Nov 2026, 09:45 UTC≈3,980 views49 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

🖤 ПЛАЩ, ГДЕ ССЫЛКА? 🛍💗 Ну что, девочки, воскресенье, а значит, время для завоза нашей любимой рубрики! 👑 Сегодня снова охотимся за классными находками, выгодными покупками и всякими полезными штучками, без которых мы, конечно же, прекрасно жили… пока не увидели их на маркетплейсах. 😂 🛍 Что делаем? 💗 Делимся ссылками на свои удачные покупки. 💗 Показываем находки с WB, Ozon и других площадок. 💗 Кидаем скидки, про…

❤‍🔥21🍾14👍10🔥4

31 Oct 2026, 22:26 UTC≈4,210 views105 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Video

Антики, посоветуйте Шурке, куда пойти работать 🦁 😃 Самый горячий антик 🔥 💬 Самое горячее общение 💬

custom 540670314372976959064custom 519087840429081380518custom 53710420173861765669custom 54499016413251037249custom 52381306638187971923custom 63255703797712832092

31 Oct 2026, 10:32 UTC≈4,340 views138 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Video

Ну почему хряк должна давать деньги ?! 🤩 Верните куче ее жизнь! Ведь она просто хочет быть женщиной 🤩 😃 Самый горячий антик 🔥 💬 Самое горячее общение 💬

custom 540670314372976959072custom 519087840429081380528🤣24custom 53710420173861765669custom 52831352252268854405

Signed Nastya Resnyanskaya

30 Oct 2026, 18:55 UTC≈4,530 views124 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Video

Вот зачем ишак разозлил жирного Хряка? 🤩 Она могла бы играть в батлы и искать донатеров, а придётся одеться как блядина и ебать какого-то типа 🤩 Во всем виноват тупой ишак, которого нет в эфире 😃 Самый горячий антик 🔥 💬 Самое горячее общение 💬

🤣89custom 540670314372976959018custom 519087840429081380510custom 63255703797712832095custom 53710420173861765662

30 Oct 2026, 18:18 UTC≈4,200 views132 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Video

Если бы Степка жил в спокойной обстановке, то Шурка бы уступила и платила алименты 😱 😃 Самый горячий антик 🔥 💬 Самое горячее общение 💬

🤡58🤣39custom 540670314372976959020custom 63255703797712832096custom 51908784042908138055custom 53710420173861765662custom 54026076819596521702

30 Oct 2026, 16:38 UTC≈4,120 views118 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Video

Ишак предупреждает кучу, чтоб ждала письмо счастья 🪄 Куча записывает ответку, чтоб пидор выдавал Степку, когда удобно ей 🫤 😃 Самый горячий антик 🔥 💬 Самое горячее общение 💬

custom 544990164132510372465🤣30custom 632557037977128320910custom 52831352252268854405🤮3🤡2custom 53710420173861765662custom 51908784042908138051

Showing the 12 most recent of 72 posts we hold for @likwid_ogra. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@likwid_ogra edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
12 August 2026
Most recent edit
12 August 2026

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 1 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“𐌡ᥙκʙᥙдᥲцᥙя ᧐ᴦρᥲ” (@likwid_ogra), 7,153 subscribers as measured 1 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/likwid_ogra.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.