Channel
@lilapittsh
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
74subscribers
-3 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002237027341 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @lilapittsh |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 3 times, most recently 11 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/lilapittsh |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 27 Aug 2026, 23:34 | 74 | -1 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 23:41 | 75 | -2 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 07:00 | 77 | no change |
| 12 Aug 2026, 06:51 | 77 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 31 July 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 January 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
206 reactions across 20 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 92 | 44.7% | |
| 💋 | 42 | 20.4% | |
| ⚡ | 18 | 8.74% | |
| 🍓 | 14 | 6.80% | |
| 💘 | 9 | 4.37% | |
| 🔥 | 8 | 3.88% | |
| 😁 | 7 | 3.40% | |
| 🥰 | 5 | 2.43% | |
| 👏 | 4 | 1.94% | |
| 👍 | 3 | 1.46% | |
| ❤🔥 | 2 | 0.971% | |
| 🎉 | 2 | 0.971% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 206 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2025 to 9 January 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
возможно, я появляюсь оооочень редко, и почти ушла с фд, но я никогда не забуду всех тех, кто когда то меня поддерживал в начале, и знаете у каждого из авторов есть любимый канал, и я не исключение, я знаю, что все каналы, на которые я была подписана, афигенные просто, но этот 💔 https://t.me/ERB_fandom_aidan я не знаю, почему, но я каждый раз возвращаюсь туда, читаю, слежу, очень много полезного я оттуда вынесла..спа…
❤8🥰2🔥1
когда уже не вылеживаешь рисовать брови и в ход идет тяжелая артиллерия(5-летняя сестра)
❤7💘2⚡1💋1
бежишь в туалет, а мама начинает тебе рассказывать что то
❤4💋2💘2⚡1
когда решал длинный пример и понял, что потерял минус в начале
❤3💋2💘2⚡1
лицо после слов подруги «я тебе покажу щас его, только не смейся»
💋5💘3⚡1
канал чуть чуть сдох, поэтому хоть это закину что ли😊
💋5❤3⚡1
еще делать? а то я уже хз нужно вам это или нет🥹
💋3⚡1❤1👍1
когда лег в 3 ночи, а вставать в 7 и ты пытаешься хоть как то проснуться
❤7🍓2⚡1
ребята, я жива, мемы вечером будут🥹
❤6🎉2🔥1
2>>>120🫂💋
⚡2
вечером делать мемы?)😇
🍓3⚡1❤1
когда пытаешься найти какое то новое хобби –да бля. как тебя держать та
💋7🔥5😁5❤4🍓2⚡1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @lilapittsh. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“𝒍𝒊𝒍𝒂𝒑𝒊𝒕𝒕𝒔.𝒕𝒖𝒂🍋” (@lilapittsh), 74 subscribers as measured 27 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lilapittsh.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.