Channel
@liliths_cover
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
99subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001919455754 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @liliths_cover |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/liliths_cover |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Sept 2026, 17:39 | 99 | +1 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 23:58 | 98 | -2 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 03:23 | 100 | -1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 10:31 | 101 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 16:31 | 101 | first reading |
10 posts held, back to 27 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 10 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
76 reactions across 10 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5195243066021152387 | 35 | 46.1% | |
| custom 5195449430609788403 | 13 | 17.1% | |
| custom 5224319440564278225 | 11 | 14.5% | |
| custom 5195076979635817529 | 6 | 7.89% | |
| custom 5195291981403686825 | 4 | 5.26% | |
| custom 5291898251295881988 | 3 | 3.95% | |
| custom 5195115668701218615 | 2 | 2.63% | |
| custom 5195421594926743604 | 2 | 2.63% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 76 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🤩🤩🤩 Ой-ой-ой, в ноябре в Вечных историях выходит ещё один роман Достоевского! 🩷💜 Жду жду жду неистово! И когда ж там уже выйдут "Бедные люди"? В янг-эдалт серии давно уже вышли, а вот в классике даже анонса пока не было... В любом случае, радуюсь! Собрание сочинений складывается весьма удачно 💜
custom 51950769796358175292custom 51952430660211523872custom 51954494306097884031
Баба Лилит КВАСИТ по пятницам... Почти не вру это был четверг
custom 51954494306097884033custom 51952430660211523872custom 51952919814036868252
Posted without readable text
custom 51952430660211523874custom 51954494306097884032custom 52243194405642782251
🌟🤩🤩🤩 Эстетика "Приключений капитана Блада" Рафаэля Сабатини Абсолютно потрясающая история! Я в диком восторге
custom 51950769796358175292custom 51952430660211523872custom 52243194405642782252
ОТПУСК 🔤🔤🔤🔤 🤩 С ноги врываемся в трудовые будни, архитектурим и все такое. В перерывах пьем кофу, сплетничаем и пишем в дневник. ☕️⭐️🤩 Всем лёгкого начала недели!
custom 51951156687012186152
🤩🤩🤩 😀😄😁😘😍🥰❤️ А это значит, что настала пора расчехлить #книжный_движ ! Итак... 😈😈😈 😈😈😈😈😈😈 😈😈😈😈😈😈😈 😈😈😈😈😈😈😈❓ ✨ Соня погружается с головой в школьную романтику: Райли Беннет надеялась, что выпускной класс будет самым важным и волнующим этапом в ее жизни. Звезда школы Ноттингем, чирлидерша, мечтающая стать капитаном группы поддержки, – она всегда получает то, чего хочет, не считая Сойера Вуда – лучшего друга, в которо…
custom 51954494306097884034custom 52243194405642782253custom 51952430660211523872
Дописала тем временем матушке в подарок на день рождения картину 🩷🪷🌳 Она как раз хотела что-то восточное с цветами~ Референс взят с просторов Пинтереста (и что-то мне подсказывает, что исходник был сгенерирован...) Лак в этот раз какой-то кринжовый попался, больше такой брать не буду, слишком с ним много мороки 🤩 Тем не менее, как вам? Масляные краски, конечно, базово 🌟 #творю_вытворяю
custom 51952430660211523876custom 51954494306097884033custom 52243194405642782253
Честное слово, книжный контент будет... Возможно, даже сегодня 🤭 Я дочитала на отдыхе "Дзен-буддизм и психоанализ" фромма, есть что добавить к моей хвалебной тираде о его работах 🌟
custom 51952430660211523875custom 51950769796358175292custom 51952919814036868252
Поле подсолнухов 🌻 Подсолнухи: 1 (один) штука 😇
custom 51952430660211523879custom 51954215949267436042custom 52918982512958819882
Вещание прервано в связи с аномальной жарой и полуобморочным состоянием админа 😵
custom 51952430660211523873custom 52243194405642782252custom 52918982512958819881
Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @liliths_cover. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Переплëт Лилит: книги • арт • дизайн” (@liliths_cover), 99 subscribers as measured 13 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/liliths_cover.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.