Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for lilitww✨

Channel

lilitww✨

@lilitwwi

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

79subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001768308475
TypeChannel
Username@lilitwwi
Created3 September 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/lilitwwi

Growth

7981807 August 2026 — 80 subscribers9 August 2026 — 80 subscribers31 August 2026 — 81 subscribers18 September 2026 — 79 subscribers7 August 202618 September 2026
4 measurements spanning 41 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 79–81 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 05:0179-2
31 Aug 2026, 21:2881+1
9 Aug 2026, 19:0380no change
7 Aug 2026, 19:5480first reading

Engagement

6 posts held, back to 4 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 6 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
23s
Average length
23s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

46 reactions across 5 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤‍🔥1328.3%
custom 52200379981202794811021.7%
817.4%
custom 5407052066872919462715.2%
custom 522421107424443463248.70%
custom 520854210154072175624.35%
🔥12.17%
🥱12.17%

Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 6 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 46 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 6 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

9 Aug 2026, 16:43 UTC19 views7 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

А мы что-то типо взлетим наконец или что 😭😭

custom 54070520668729194623custom 52085421015407217562custom 52200379981202794811custom 52242110742444346321

9 Aug 2026, 09:22 UTC26 views11 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Все еще день 1, все еще в пути

❤‍🔥53custom 52200379981202794812🔥1

9 Aug 2026, 03:03 UTC32 views11 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

День 1. Начало всей движухи, пока вроде на спокойном 😃

custom 522003799812027948153custom 54070520668729194623

7 Aug 2026, 09:00 UTC39 views8 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

⭐️

❤‍🔥32custom 52200379981202794811custom 52242110742444346321custom 54070520668729194621

5 Aug 2026, 19:26 UTC51 views9 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Сегодня такой вайбик, сильно люблю своих друзей. Вывозят любой мой депресняк, ура 🕺🕺

❤‍🔥5custom 52242110742444346322🥱1custom 52200379981202794811

4 Aug 2026, 17:05 UTC43 viewsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @shivapepeVideo

Хоряшка от прекрасной @Min_universe Очень было непривычно и круто 💍💐

Showing the 6 most recent of 6 posts we hold for @lilitwwi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“lilitww✨” (@lilitwwi), 79 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lilitwwi.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.