Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 84% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Views per post sit far below this size band
16.2 average views per post against 40,058 subscribers — an engagement rate of 0.04%. Across the 24,202 registered channels in the same cohort — 31,624–99,996 subscribers — the middle half sit between 2.60% and 15.0%, with a median of 6.80%.
What this was computed from
Window
30 days (30 August 2026 – 29 September 2026)
Posts measured
70 of 70 published in the window (70 exact, 0 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled
1,131
Mature posts only
0.048% over 46 posts read at least 24h after publication
When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or below the 1st percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — below it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.
This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.
Recorded under the key err_low, last confirmed 29 September 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Growth
33 measurements spanning 49 days, net +22,385. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 13,187–43,563 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 33
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
25 Sept 2026, 10:41
40,058
+17,232
19 Sept 2026, 00:21
22,826
-506
16 Sept 2026, 14:19
23,332
-456
14 Sept 2026, 16:58
23,788
-370
13 Sept 2026, 06:40
24,158
-4,312
11 Sept 2026, 07:21
28,470
-2,041
8 Sept 2026, 11:18
30,511
-800
5 Sept 2026, 06:20
31,311
-499
3 Sept 2026, 09:44
31,810
-414
2 Sept 2026, 03:46
32,224
-119
1 Sept 2026, 06:26
32,343
-287
31 Aug 2026, 04:07
32,630
-334
30 Aug 2026, 07:09
32,964
-237
29 Aug 2026, 03:34
33,201
-312
28 Aug 2026, 06:58
33,513
-237
27 Aug 2026, 04:24
33,750
-158
26 Aug 2026, 04:13
33,908
-250
25 Aug 2026, 00:53
34,158
-356
23 Aug 2026, 09:43
34,514
-307
21 Aug 2026, 18:59
34,821
first reading
Engagement
152 posts held, back to 23 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 67 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
0.04%
avg views ÷ 40,058 subscribers
Avg views / post
16.2
70 posts measured
Reaction rate
—
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
70
of 152 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 September 2026
Posts held
152 (23 July 2026 – 28 September 2026)
Views total
1,131
Reactions total
—
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
29 Sept 2026, 12:57 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈1,640
Videos
≈394
Links
≈41
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 29 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
15m 51s
Average length
30s
Measured directly from 32 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
[ACTUALITÉ]
📊 Les ETF Solana Spot américains viennent d’enregistrer leur deuxième meilleure semaine depuis leur lancement, avec environ 188 millions de dollars d’entrées nettes.
Le record reste celui de leur semaine de lancement, à environ 199 millions de dollars. À noter également : les ETF Solana ont enregistré 86,7 millions de dollars d’entrées sur la seule journée de vendredi, un nouveau record quotidien… 💱
Live Asian = BRAQUAGE 😂
Je vous le compte dans le bilan : vente à 4252.
Pas le temps de mettre un TP1, on a pris du profit à 35 et on a encore une position en cours.
⚠️ Ne rentrez pas maintenant, on a profité d’un momentum. On indique tout et on détaille tout dans L’Imprimante.
Le bilan de la semaine en partant d’un capital de 1000$ tout les trades qui on été envoyé sur le canal cette semaine je ne compte pas les lives mais des semaine prochaine j’inclus tout !
📊 BILAN DE LA SEMAINE
Capital de départ : 1 000 $
Capital de fin : 1 183 $
Performance : +183 $ / +18,3 %
14 trades exécutés
🟢 11 trades gagnants
🔴 3 trades perdants
⸻
🟢 LUNDI
1️⃣ LONG GBPUSD
Lot : 1
Entrée : 1.33801
SL : 1.33708
TP1 : 1.33950
TP2 : 1.34227
❌ SL : -9 pips = -90 $
Avec le x2 : -180 $
Explication :
Le scénario haussier n’a finalement pas été confirmé et le prix est venu chercher le stop. Le tr…
[ACTUALITÉ]
🚨 Des chercheurs veulent rendre certaines transactions Bitcoin totalement privées… sans modifier les règles de Bitcoin.
Baptisé « Shielded Bitcoin », le projet utiliserait des preuves zero-knowledge et des données chiffrées pour masquer l’expéditeur, le destinataire et le montant, tout en permettant de vérifier que les fonds sont valides et ne sont pas dépensés deux fois. 🤑
➡️ L’idée reste pour l’insta…
🖨️🔥 CE MONDE NE FAIT PAS DE CADEAUX. 🔥🖨️
Soit t’es AVEC NOUS 🤝💣
🖨️ Tu imprimes.
📈 Tu avances.
Soit t’es SEUL CONTRE EUX 🥶⛓️
📉 Tu rames.
😶🌫️ Tu subis.
⏳ Personne t’attend.
🚪 La porte se ferme.
📩 “PRINT” maintenant → @sadeksupportt
💥 Ou continue de regarder les autres imprimer
📈 Résultat membre — zanitsu
+1,2% merci @NJ et @BKR | Anonnymous pour le live 🖨️
Showing the 12 most recent of 152 posts we hold for @limprimantezxwerqqi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“L'imprimante by sadek” (@limprimantezxwerqqi), 40,058 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/limprimantezxwerqqi.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.