Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Линф

Channel

Линф

@linf21

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

36,326subscribers

-566 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001835375322
TypeChannel
Username@linf21
DescriptionПредложка - @minilinfbot 🔥Ютуб - https://m.youtube.com/@linf21 😏ТикТок - https://clck.ru/3FotuR Сотрудничество - @poleno_WW
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live1 September 2026
Measurements held24
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 1 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/linf21

Growth

36,32636,96236,6448 August 2026 — 36,892 subscribers8 August 2026 — 36,900 subscribers9 August 2026 — 36,927 subscribers10 August 2026 — 36,934 subscribers11 August 2026 — 36,946 subscribers12 August 2026 — 36,959 subscribers13 August 2026 — 36,962 subscribers14 August 2026 — 36,938 subscribers16 August 2026 — 36,911 subscribers17 August 2026 — 36,865 subscribers18 August 2026 — 36,841 subscribers19 August 2026 — 36,827 subscribers20 August 2026 — 36,819 subscribers21 August 2026 — 36,758 subscribers22 August 2026 — 36,723 subscribers24 August 2026 — 36,679 subscribers25 August 2026 — 36,649 subscribers26 August 2026 — 36,613 subscribers27 August 2026 — 36,546 subscribers28 August 2026 — 36,497 subscribers29 August 2026 — 36,465 subscribers30 August 2026 — 36,419 subscribers31 August 2026 — 36,369 subscribers1 September 2026 — 36,326 subscribers8 August 20261 September 2026
24 measurements spanning 24 days, net -566. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 36,231–37,057 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 24
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
1 Sept 2026, 16:4636,326-43
31 Aug 2026, 18:3736,369-50
30 Aug 2026, 15:2636,419-46
29 Aug 2026, 14:3536,465-32
28 Aug 2026, 14:0436,497-49
27 Aug 2026, 12:1436,546-67
26 Aug 2026, 09:1336,613-36
25 Aug 2026, 12:1836,649-30
24 Aug 2026, 13:0836,679-44
22 Aug 2026, 20:2736,723-35
21 Aug 2026, 07:0236,758-61
20 Aug 2026, 06:1436,819-8
19 Aug 2026, 08:2736,827-14
18 Aug 2026, 10:4436,841-24
17 Aug 2026, 13:4536,865-46
16 Aug 2026, 09:0436,911-27
14 Aug 2026, 23:0836,938-24
13 Aug 2026, 11:3536,962+3
12 Aug 2026, 11:1836,959+13
11 Aug 2026, 12:4636,946first reading

Engagement

26 posts held, back to 9 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 51 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
36.8%
avg views ÷ 36,326 subscribers
Avg views / post
13,400
14 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.85%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
14
of 26 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 August 2026
Posts held26 (9 July 202629 August 2026)
Views total187,390
Reactions total10,969
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken2 Sept 2026, 07:50 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
324
Videos
32
Links
119

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 2 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

18,937 reactions across 26 posts, in 24 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 57.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
10,91457.6%
🔥2,60613.8%
😭1,2866.79%
🤨1,0645.62%
😢6353.35%
🤣3411.80%
😁2531.34%
🫡2431.28%
🥰2221.17%
😱2121.12%
🤓1921.01%
🍌1530.808%
😨1300.686%
🤔1140.602%
🌭1130.597%
👍1100.581%
😡880.465%
😇810.428%
🗿520.275%
😈430.227%
4 further kinds850.449%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 26 of the 26 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 18,937 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 26 most recent posts we hold, published 9 July 2026 to 29 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
278
across the posts below
Posts paid on
22
of 26 we hold a reading for · 85%
Most on one post
136
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @linf21. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 26 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 9 July 2026 to 29 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

29 Aug 2026, 14:14 UTC≈5,670 views1,365 reactions12 Starsread 2 September 2026

я просрал лето

777😭355🫡155👍27🔥18🤓11🌭10😁8

26 Aug 2026, 17:33 UTC≈8,220 views497 reactions4 Starsread 2 September 2026

я кстати в свое время егэ сдал на 218 баллов за три предмета, ЭТО НЕ РЕКЛАМА ЩАС чисто щас вспомнил и опытом делюсь и мне интересно стало нормик по баллам или я капец камень был 🪑

395🤓69🔥21🗿5🥰4😈3

20 Aug 2026, 10:46 UTC≈13,200 views1,012 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Ладно, прошлое фото было фейком, вот мой настоящий обед:

686😭91🤨74🤣61🌭31🤔28😡19😨14

20 Aug 2026, 10:23 UTC≈12,100 views793 reactions5 Starsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Мой обед кстати 🤤

532😭120😨54🤨22👌19🥰17👍13🤪12

20 Aug 2026, 07:44 UTC≈11,700 views475 reactionsread 2 September 2026

Хорошие новости, мне уже гораздо лучше и завтра меня наконец-то выпустят отсюда 🙂 Как вернусь, сразу сяду снимать новое видео, а пока можете посмотрите как меня, мыслана, павука и других блогеров закрыли в кубе и издевались над нами СМОТРЕТЬ (забыл сказать сразу)

382🔥51😁22🌭7🤓7😭4🗿2

16 Aug 2026, 14:29 UTC≈13,900 views785 reactions8 Starsread 2 September 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

😢534😭10678🫡23🔥14🥰11🤣9😱8

16 Aug 2026, 14:21 UTC≈13,300 views867 reactions3 Starsread 2 September 2026
Photo

всем привет подписчик, че делаете? я вот вот в больнице лежу опять… со мной все хорошо, просто легенькая операция вчера была а так все кайф хз когда выпустят 🫩🥀

562😭189😱54🫡32🔥9🤨9🤓6🥰3

8 Aug 2026, 15:46 UTC≈18,300 views1,437 reactions17 Starsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Во 2 части Верити буквально так будет выглядеть:

1,010🤣261🔥61🌭37😭23🤨16🥰12🍌10

7 Aug 2026, 13:19 UTC≈18,100 views893 reactions7 Starsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Даааа ДАААААА, оно вышло… видос немного экспериментальный, но надеюсь вам зайдет ✌️💀🥀 Я Нашел РЕАЛЬНЫЙ Мод на ВЕРИТИ (ссылки не будет, ее съел верити)

🔥560128😢73🥰55😡44🫡20😘7🤓3

7 Aug 2026, 12:21 UTC≈15,200 views416 reactions1 Starread 2 September 2026

ЧЕРЕЗ 1 ЧАС НОВОЕ ВИДЕО

337🔥34😭14😱11🍌9👍5😁3😘2

6 Aug 2026, 14:36 UTC≈15,500 views598 reactionsread 2 September 2026

почему я только щас узнал, что у меня есть фанатский тг канал, который уже пол года арты и контент какой-то выкладывает, и самое удивительное, там даже РЕАЛЬНЫЕ ЛЮДИ сидят и лайкают посты 🌚 интернет не перестает удивлять

485🔥53🤔31🥰12🍌5🗿5😱5🤓2

6 Aug 2026, 14:35 UTC≈14,800 views377 reactions1 Starread 2 September 2026
Forwarded from @linf21cfPhoto

Еще посидим еще посидим Тгк: @TomorrowSays 🎸 это очень туфф #тейк @linf_cool_bot

317🔥34🤔15🗿4🌭3😁2😱2

Showing the 12 most recent of 26 posts we hold for @linf21. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 563,462 of 1,629,535 entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 1 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Линф” (@linf21), 36,326 subscribers as measured 1 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/linf21.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.