Growth
Growth history is still building. We hold one measurement for this entry. A trend needs at least two, taken days apart — so this will fill in on its own rather than being estimated. We do not publish numbers we have not measured.
Engagement
18 posts held, back to 25 June 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 25.8%
- avg views ÷ 607 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 157
- 4 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 10.7%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 4
- of 18 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 169
- Videos
- 9
- Links
- 43
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 19 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
- Video runtime
- 48s
- Average length
- 48s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
350 reactions across 18 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 60.9% of them.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 350 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 25 June 2025 to 6 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
6 Sept 2026, 10:05 UTC107 views24 reactionsread 19 September 2026 Photo
Technically, it’s still summer in Tbilisi, and my homemade ice cream season has started 😁
But we’re nerds, aren’t we. Ice cream is an umbrella term and not exactly what we see in the photo.
🧃Question: What do we call hard and icy juice (or purée) on a stick? (Фруктовый лед)
🧊 Answer: ice lolly (BrE) / popsicle (AmE)
Remember to react to the post to show me you’re here and reading me :) your reactions are my motiv…
❤18⚡4🆒2
Signed Lidia Atlanova
2 Sept 2026, 07:09 UTC148 views14 reactionsread 19 September 2026 Photo
Kak shlagbaum po-angliyski
Yesterday I took a stroll around my neighborhood and saw this 😁
⚪️ The red-and-white striped system in the photo is called a barrier / barrier gate.
🔴 I suggest calling the worker a gate attendant.
She’s clearly very decent and slightly tired.
#lingua_lab_vocabulary
❤10🤣2😁2
Signed Lidia Atlanova
28 Aug 2026, 19:47 UTC186 views17 reactionsread 19 September 2026 Photo
☀️Summer is almost done with us and I’ve just realised there’s been no summer vocabulary here! What a shame
Squeezing in some before it’s too late 😁
❓What do you call the type of top I’m wearing? Like a T-shirt with 2 fabric straps instead of sleeves
✨Answer: a tank top. My fav sort of summer wear :3
Go to comments and give us some more summer words to make summer stay longer
#lingua_lab_vocabulary
❤17
Signed Lidia Atlanova
27 Aug 2026, 08:31 UTC185 views12 reactionsread 19 September 2026 Photo
Recently life’s brought me to the Buddhist philosophy. It feels like I’ve found a missing piece: my beliefs have long been close to this branch of thought.
I love “collecting” quotes like this in the photo around me — some will say “banal”, I say “right on cue, thanks for reminding!” (Location: Grafika, a cool cocktail bar in Tbilisi)
Go to comments to see where “right on cue” comes from + remember to like the post…
❤12
Signed Lidia Atlanova
16 Aug 2026, 16:46 UTC236 views23 reactionsread 19 September 2026 Photo
🍎 This is an apple strudel I’ve just cooked (with seasonal apples!). Do you know what we call this type of pastry? (Like croissants 🥐)
Answer: puff pastry
Like if you’d eat one ❤️
#lingua_lab_vocabulary
❤19❤🔥2👍1😍1
Signed Lidia Atlanova
12 Aug 2026, 13:28 UTC229 views12 reactionsread 19 September 2026 Photo
Look at my goosebumps and…
Do you know the expression “go cold turkey”?
🍗 go cold turkey — to stop a habit or addictive substance completely and suddenly.
I tried cutting down on coffee, but eventually I just went cold turkey.
🦃 What I found out recently is the theory of its origins. It links it to the cold, clammy skin and goosebumps people can experience during drug withdrawal, resembling the skin of a plucked t…
❤9❤🔥1👍1🕊1
Signed Lidia Atlanova
16 Jul 2026, 18:03 UTC317 views24 reactionsread 19 September 2026 Photo
Russian idiom: пресечь в зародыше
In English, literally: отщипнуть бутон
Try to translate and then check the comment section 🧚
Remember to like the post! It motivates me :)
#lingua_lab_vocabulary
❤16❤🔥5👍3
Signed Lidia Atlanova
11 Jul 2026, 16:33 UTC324 views16 reactionsread 19 September 2026 Photo
Void filled…
#lingua_lab_memes
😁11❤4😱1
Signed Lidia Atlanova
9 Jul 2026, 06:28 UTC302 views19 reactionsread 19 September 2026 Photo
Pronunciation
⛰️ Recently I saw my British friend and told her about my trip to some Georgian canyons /ˈkæn.jənz/. She looked slightly surprised at first, but then things seemed to start making sense.
☀️ Thing is: at first, I accidentally said “Kenyans” /ˈken.jənz/ (citizens of Kenya). Like: we saw some Kenyans . Then I started saying “canyons” with /æ/, and things got clear 😁
🔊 Kenyans /ˈken.jənz/ vs canyons /…
🤣10❤8😁1
Signed Lidia Atlanova
7 Jul 2026, 20:19 UTC257 views11 reactionsread 19 September 2026 Video
Hey there! ✨ Fun fact: I’ve just found out that in Hindu they use 1 word for “tomorrow” and “yesterday”.
I suppose it says something about our brain. A lot of my students confuse “yesterday” and “tomorrow” when speaking English. I sometimes do, too, both in English and Russian.
Probably that’s because tomorrow and yesterday are one “step” away from today, and for our brain it mightn’t matter which way…🤔
❤8❤🔥1🤯1😱1
Signed Lidia Atlanova
26 Jun 2026, 07:39 UTC326 views17 reactionsread 19 September 2026 Photo
Gotcha! Surprise-surprise, both are correct.
Knock ON the door: the physical action of knocking on the door
Knock AT the door: someone is there, at the door, and I hear them knocking.
See the pics to grasp the difference 😊
P.S. I was shocked when I found out! I was watching The Handmaid's Tale and couldn't get my head around it.
#lingua_lab_vocabulary
❤12❤🔥4🆒1
Signed Lidia Atlanova
26 Jun 2026, 07:37 UTC294 views3 reactionsread 19 September 2026 Poll
Which one's correct?
- to knock ON the door63%
- to knock AT the door54%
The shares total 117%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
👍3
Signed Lidia Atlanova
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @lingua_lab. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
26 Jun 2026, 07:37 UTCAnonymous Poll35 voters Which one's correct?
- to knock ON the door63%
- to knock AT the door54%
The shares total 117%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
25 Jun 2025, 10:54 UTCAnonymous Quiz69 voters Which of the myths did Aristotle disprove?
- Women have fewer teeth than men.17%
- Eels do not reproduce, they spontaneously generate.9%
- Elephants cannot bend their knees.20%
- The earth is the centre of the universe.54%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 25 June 2025 to 6 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
🎡English Teaching🎡
@easyenglishfun · 23,032
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 19 September 2026 🏆 English Stories 🏆
@all_englishstories · 22,783
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 20 September 2026 This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Lingua.Lab | Advanced English” (@lingua_lab), 607 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lingua_lab.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.