Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for لینکدونی رایگان دوستیابی چت🌀

Channel

لینکدونی رایگان دوستیابی چت🌀

@linkdonii_abi

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

15,517subscribers

-4,060 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002123974338
TypeChannel
Username@linkdonii_abi
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded12 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held28
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/linkdonii_abi

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 95% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

15,51719,57717,54712 August 2026 — 19,577 subscribers12 August 2026 — 19,577 subscribers13 August 2026 — 19,518 subscribers14 August 2026 — 19,143 subscribers15 August 2026 — 18,604 subscribers17 August 2026 — 17,935 subscribers18 August 2026 — 17,605 subscribers19 August 2026 — 17,407 subscribers20 August 2026 — 18,194 subscribers21 August 2026 — 18,045 subscribers22 August 2026 — 17,836 subscribers24 August 2026 — 17,395 subscribers25 August 2026 — 17,173 subscribers26 August 2026 — 16,862 subscribers27 August 2026 — 16,669 subscribers28 August 2026 — 16,527 subscribers29 August 2026 — 16,155 subscribers30 August 2026 — 16,487 subscribers31 August 2026 — 16,260 subscribers1 September 2026 — 15,937 subscribers2 September 2026 — 16,036 subscribers4 September 2026 — 16,740 subscribers6 September 2026 — 16,591 subscribers10 September 2026 — 16,533 subscribers12 September 2026 — 16,328 subscribers13 September 2026 — 15,664 subscribers15 September 2026 — 15,739 subscribers17 September 2026 — 15,517 subscribers12 August 202617 September 2026
28 measurements spanning 36 days, net -4,060. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 14,908–20,186 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 28
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 10:1915,517-222
15 Sept 2026, 12:4015,739+75
13 Sept 2026, 23:0015,664-664
12 Sept 2026, 05:4016,328-205
10 Sept 2026, 02:3916,533-58
6 Sept 2026, 17:2016,591-149
4 Sept 2026, 06:0116,740+704
2 Sept 2026, 20:2916,036+99
1 Sept 2026, 17:2515,937-323
31 Aug 2026, 17:4816,260-227
30 Aug 2026, 14:1516,487+332
29 Aug 2026, 10:4516,155-372
28 Aug 2026, 11:2516,527-142
27 Aug 2026, 14:0316,669-193
26 Aug 2026, 16:0316,862-311
25 Aug 2026, 14:0317,173-222
24 Aug 2026, 16:1617,395-441
22 Aug 2026, 21:5917,836-209
21 Aug 2026, 08:2418,045-149
20 Aug 2026, 09:4318,194first reading

Engagement

325 posts held, back to 11 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 41 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
0.724%
avg views ÷ 15,517 subscribers
Avg views / post
112
122 posts measured
Reaction rate
6.78%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
123
of 325 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held325 (11 August 20262 September 2026)
Views total13,711
Reactions total930
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken3 Sept 2026, 10:09 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

2,562 reactions across 324 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😍72728.4%
45317.7%
❤‍🔥33313.0%
💯33012.9%
🙏2339.09%
😎2319.02%
🤗1927.49%
👍281.09%
👏240.937%
🔥40.156%
👎30.117%
🆒10.039%
🎄10.039%
💋10.039%
🥰10.039%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 324 of the 325 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,562 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 325 most recent posts we hold, published 11 August 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

2 Sept 2026, 20:26 UTC69 views7 reactionsread 3 September 2026

🔵 ثبت لینک رایگان 🔗 🟡 ممبر گروه و کانال 👫 ❤️👁‍🗨ویو سین ریکشن و لایک👍🏼 🟣 خدمات اینستاگرام 💟 🔴خدمات یوتیوب 🎥 https://t.me/+0MMM1suC8eoyMWU0 ‌

2❤‍🔥1💯1😍1😎1🙏1

2 Sept 2026, 18:52 UTC90 views8 reactionsread 3 September 2026

https://t.me/+UAIkxwaye3I2MTU0

3❤‍🔥1💯1😍1😎1🙏1

2 Sept 2026, 18:44 UTC91 views8 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

https://t.me/+puMp0VGXdVRlYWY0 گپ تتلیتی ها

3❤‍🔥1💯1😍1😎1🙏1

2 Sept 2026, 18:27 UTC84 views8 reactionsread 3 September 2026

✅ گروه 😜پاتوق خنده😜 ⚜ 27 اگه شما بچه‌های ته کلاسین ما بچه‌های دم دفتریم! ️ https://t.me/joinchat/jXj68Ov5lOVmYzQ0

3❤‍🔥1💯1😍1😎1🙏1

2 Sept 2026, 16:34 UTC58 views7 reactionsread 3 September 2026

‌‌ ‌‌🔗با استفاده از دکمه زیر میتونی لینک گروهتو رایگان ثبت کنی😍 👥ممبر فیک داعمی بدون ریزش هم موجوده میتونی سفارش بدی👇🏻

2❤‍🔥1💯1😍1😎1🙏1

2 Sept 2026, 15:46 UTC88 views8 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

🌿 آلاچیق چوبی دوستانه 🌿 💬 دورهمی | گپ و گفت | خنده و سرگرمی 🤝 جمعی صمیمی برای دوستای باحال ✨ جای تو بین ما خالیه! ✨ https://t.me/+Dny2yr_3ZW0zN2E0

2❤‍🔥1💯1🥰1😍1😎1🙏1

2 Sept 2026, 15:29 UTC72 views7 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

دوستان قدیمی https://t.me/joinchat/jmvK2IAIiAxkY2Zk

2❤‍🔥1💯1😍1😎1🙏1

2 Sept 2026, 14:14 UTC71 views7 reactionsread 3 September 2026

✅ گروه گروه 70. 50. 60 متاهلا مجردا ⚜ 296 گروه دهی ۶۰ 😄۷۰ https://t.me/joinchat/IJ70XCSIQjBiM2Nk

2❤‍🔥1💯1😍1😎1🙏1

2 Sept 2026, 13:59 UTC68 views8 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

• نام گروه : Bad guys ✌🏻💙🫐🧊 • تعداد عضو : 73 • توضیحات : ⚜Welcome to the group!⚜ ✅High activity = becoming an administrator!✅ • لینک گروه : ━┅┅ ✦ ┅┅━ 🔗 https://t.me/+-blhVWUHdYplZmE0

3❤‍🔥1💯1😍1😎1🙏1

2 Sept 2026, 13:21 UTC70 views7 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

• نام گروه : ꧁༺⚜️ 𝐄𝐋𝐈𝐓𝐄 𝐂𝐈𝐑𝐂𝐋𝐄 ⚜️༻꧂ • تعداد عضو : 639 • توضیحات : 🎭 EliteCircle 🎮 اینجا دورهمیِ شوخی، خنده، بازی و سرگرمیه 😎 🤝 رفاقت آزاده، بی‌احترامی ممنوعه 😂 بخندیم، بازی کنیم، خوش بگذرونیم ✨ با احترام به همه، با انرژی خوب کنار هم EliteCircle | جمع خاصِ آدمای باحال ❤️ • لینک گروه : ━┅┅ ✦ ┅┅━ 🔗 https://t.me/+PYKzJ4RxCpJiYTgx

2❤‍🔥1💯1😍1😎1🙏1

2 Sept 2026, 12:30 UTC68 views7 reactionsread 3 September 2026

✅ گروه ❤️‍🔥𝐷𝑒𝑙𝑏𝑎𝑛❤️‍🔥 ⚜ 92 پی وی ممنوع⛔ کل کل آزاده تا وقتی به فحش نکشه بگو بخندم ازاده خلاصه ک هوا همو داشته باشین https://t.me/joinchat/cD14mgmGuXQwZTM8

2❤‍🔥1💯1😍1😎1🙏1

2 Sept 2026, 11:55 UTC88 views8 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

🎗 گروه : 𝗣𝗘𝗡𝗧😈𝗛𝗢𝗨𝗦𝗘 👥 تعداد عضو : 6241 🛂 قوانین : ☾︎⃝💜🪩⇨𝗣𝗘𝗡𝗧😈𝗛𝗢𝗨𝗦𝗘✦☽💜 💜⃤..𝒘𝒆𝒍𝒍𝒄𝒐𝒎𝒆-🌑♾️ 💜⃤⊰ 𝒗𝒐𝒊𝒄𝒆 𝒄𝒂𝒍𝒍 🎙 💜⃤🔞⇨ 𝐫𝐞𝐦𝐨𝐯𝐞 💜⃤⊰ 𝐌𝐨𝐤𝐡𝐳𝐚𝐧𝐢 "𝐚𝐳𝐚𝐝" !! 💜⃤𝐅𝐨𝐬𝐡 𝐌𝐨𝐬𝐚𝐯𝐢 𝐛𝐚 𝐑𝐢𝐦 💜⃤ 🔗 لینک عضویت : https://t.me/+7X0zqslppHlmOWVk

3❤‍🔥1💯1😍1😎1🙏1

Showing the 12 most recent of 325 posts we hold for @linkdonii_abi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 4 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

2 Sept 2026, 11:07 UTCAnonymous Poll67 voters

⚜️ آیا موافق پولی شدن لینکدونی و در نتیجه افزایش جذب ممبر هستید؟

  1. بله صد در صد موافقم 💯❤️‍🔥18%
  2. زیر ۱۰۰ تومن و با جذب باشه بله موافقم✅9%
  3. اگه تعرفه ها اقتصادی باشه موافقم🌱12%
  4. نه ؛ رایگان بمونه🌙70%
  5. نظری ندارم🥱1%

The shares total 110%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

31 Aug 2026, 20:17 UTCAnonymous Poll55 voters

⚜️ آیا موافق پولی شدن لینکدونی و در نتیجه افزایش جذب ممبر هستید؟

  1. بله صد در صد موافقم 💯❤️‍🔥16%
  2. زیر ۱۰۰ تومن و با جذب باشه بله موافقم✅5%
  3. اگه تعرفه ها اقتصادی باشه موافقم🌱15%
  4. نه ؛ رایگان بمونه🌙67%
  5. نظری ندارم🥱2%

The shares total 105%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

30 Aug 2026, 19:32 UTCAnonymous Poll48 voters

⚜️ آیا موافق پولی شدن لینکدونی و در نتیجه افزایش جذب ممبر هستید؟

  1. بله صد در صد موافقم 💯❤️‍🔥19%
  2. زیر ۱۰۰ تومن و با جذب باشه بله موافقم✅6%
  3. اگه تعرفه ها اقتصادی باشه موافقم🌱17%
  4. نه ؛ رایگان بمونه🌙63%
  5. نظری ندارم🥱2%

The shares total 107%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

30 Aug 2026, 14:08 UTCAnonymous Poll48 voters

⚜️ آیا موافق پولی شدن لینکدونی و در نتیجه افزایش جذب ممبر هستید؟

  1. بله صد در صد موافقم 💯❤️‍🔥19%
  2. زیر ۱۰۰ تومن و با جذب باشه بله موافقم✅6%
  3. اگه تعرفه ها اقتصادی باشه موافقم🌱17%
  4. نه ؛ رایگان بمونه🌙63%
  5. نظری ندارم🥱2%

The shares total 107%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 325 most recent posts we hold, published 11 August 2026 to 2 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“لینکدونی رایگان دوستیابی چت🌀” (@linkdonii_abi), 15,517 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/linkdonii_abi.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.