Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Testbase

Channel

Testbase

@links_from_testbase

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,639subscribers

-14 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001404686837
TypeChannel
Username@links_from_testbase
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 30 November 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held11
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/links_from_testbase

Topic

Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 17 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 89% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

1,6391,6531,6467 August 2026 — 1,653 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,653 subscribers8 August 2026 — 1,652 subscribers11 August 2026 — 1,651 subscribers15 August 2026 — 1,647 subscribers19 August 2026 — 1,645 subscribers22 August 2026 — 1,647 subscribers25 August 2026 — 1,645 subscribers28 August 2026 — 1,644 subscribers31 August 2026 — 1,641 subscribers13 September 2026 — 1,639 subscribers7 August 202613 September 2026
11 measurements spanning 37 days, net -14. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,637–1,655 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Sept 2026, 18:581,639-2
31 Aug 2026, 21:581,641-3
28 Aug 2026, 16:241,644-1
25 Aug 2026, 15:321,645-2
22 Aug 2026, 20:031,647+2
19 Aug 2026, 00:021,645-2
15 Aug 2026, 16:521,647-4
11 Aug 2026, 22:451,651-1
8 Aug 2026, 16:081,652-1
7 Aug 2026, 22:001,653no change
7 Aug 2026, 21:521,653first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 29 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 31 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

150 reactions across 19 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥7046.7%
❤6140.7%
👍74.67%
❤‍🔥42.67%
🥰42.67%
✍32.00%
💘10.667%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 150 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 29 January 2026 to 31 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

31 Jul 2026, 11:44 UTC363 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Мне так нравится, как выглядит общение с ИИ в верстке книги 😊

❤‍🔥4🥰4❤2💘1

27 Jul 2026, 05:46 UTC622 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Мои 12 недель в году. Часть 34 (Вернулась на работу! ДР мужа и детей: Кате 1 годик, Леше 2) https://okiseleva.blogspot.com/2026/07/12-34-1-2.html Вот и очередное подведение итогов)) Ох, это мы в этом цикле няню меняли? Как вспомню, так вздрогну... А еще кучу болезней прошли, коляска ломалась... А ещё я из декрета вышла! В общем, жизнь кипит, бурлит, пытаюсь успеть хоть что-то, пока получается 😂 Результаты цикла: К…

🔥8

17 Jul 2026, 11:44 UTC583 viewsread 7 August 2026

Про наши автотесты коллеги на Хабре рассказали)

17 Jul 2026, 11:44 UTC729 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @hflabs_people

Мечтают ли тестировщики об электронных таблицах? Мы в Лабсе работаем с CDI — большой системой управления клиентскими данными. За годы ее жизни у нас накопилось много сложностей в тестировании. А мы сложности любим: превращаем их в интересные задачи 😎 В чем дело боль? В CDI нельзя просто взять и добавить телефон клиента в новую строчку в таблице. За этим скрываются атрибуты, история изменений, служебные таблицы и мн…

❤4

13 Jul 2026, 15:44 UTC800 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Как я сделала отчет о дифференциальном тестировании через Cursor https://habr.com/ru/articles/1058722/ Я хочу рассказать, как я сделала отчет о дифференциальном тестировании (сравнение двух функций на одних данных) через ИИ. Знаю, что многие уже применяют ИИ и в хвост и в гриву, но также много тех, кто пока не умеет этого делать. Поэтому я хочу показать на конкретном примере из жизни, где еще несколько лет назад пр…

🔥3❤2

30 Jun 2026, 13:04 UTC977 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Как ИИ нам проверку уязвимостей сломал https://okiseleva.blogspot.com/2026/06/blog-post_30.html Не сакссес-стори едиными славится ИИ =))) Сегодня про косяки!

❤4👍1

22 Jun 2026, 17:08 UTC≈1,290 views28 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Я тут на работу вышла из декрета! А это значит, что мой блог снова оживет 😀 И теперь тут будут не только "академические" статьи с теорией для студентов, но и всякие басенки из жизни. Особенно первое время, когда огребаешь всякое «как настроить рабочее ПО» 🫣 В том числе считаю полезной рубрику «где тестировщик может применять ИИ в своей работе», для вдохновения отлично подойдет)) Чуть позже в такую рубрику войдет и …

❤21🔥5👍2

9 Jun 2026, 10:50 UTC≈1,340 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Типы границ для классов эквивалентности https://habr.com/ru/articles/1045436/

❤1🔥1

3 Jun 2026, 10:53 UTC≈1,390 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Как написать автотест на HTML в Postman-е https://youtu.be/uYzETFE72rg (ссылка в ВК)

✍3❤2

22 Apr 2026, 15:04 UTC≈1,590 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Заменит ли ИИ тестировщиков? https://youtu.be/-vlYkjzsi5E Поговорим о насущной теме?))

❤11

7 Apr 2026, 12:50 UTC≈1,450 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026

27-28 марта в Москве прошла 3-я конференция для технических писателей — TechWriter Days 3. Что там было интересненького? Рассказала, где побывала сама и что хочу посмотреть потом в записи ^_^ https://okiseleva.blogspot.com/2026/04/techwriter-days-3.html

❤3

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @links_from_testbase. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Testbase” (@links_from_testbase), 1,639 subscribers as measured 13 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/links_from_testbase.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.