Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Linux Club

Channel

Linux Club

@linuxklub

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

8,546subscribers

+82 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001744097804
TypeChannel
Username@linuxklub
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live29 August 2026
Measurements held10
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 29 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/linuxklub

Topic

Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 18 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Views per post sit far above this size band

12,900 average views per post against 8,546 subscribers — an engagement rate of 151.4%. Across the 31,645 registered channels in the same cohort — 3,163–9,999 subscribers, posting mainly in Russian — the middle half sit between 5.99% and 21.9%, with a median of 11.7%.

What this was computed from
Window30 days (31 July 2026 30 August 2026)
Posts measured13 of 13 published in the window (0 exact, 13 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled168,230
Mature posts only151.4% over 13 posts read at least 24h after publication
Subscribers8,546 measured 29 August 2026
Cohortb3162:rus · 31,645 channels · p10 3.01% · p25 5.99% · p50 11.7% · p75 21.9% · p90 36.0%
Position in cohort99.798th percentile · 13.0× the cohort median
Uncertainty±0.045% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding
Post languageRussian · 100.0%of the window’s posts

When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.

This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal.A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.

Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 30 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

8,4638,5578,5107 August 2026 — 8,464 subscribers7 August 2026 — 8,464 subscribers7 August 2026 — 8,463 subscribers10 August 2026 — 8,521 subscribers13 August 2026 — 8,519 subscribers17 August 2026 — 8,554 subscribers20 August 2026 — 8,557 subscribers23 August 2026 — 8,555 subscribers26 August 2026 — 8,545 subscribers29 August 2026 — 8,546 subscribers8,5467 August 202629 August 2026
10 measurements spanning 22 days, net +82. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,449–8,571 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
29 Aug 2026, 05:548,546+1
26 Aug 2026, 04:428,545-10
23 Aug 2026, 13:588,555-2
20 Aug 2026, 04:088,557+3
17 Aug 2026, 09:478,554+35
13 Aug 2026, 11:158,519-2
10 Aug 2026, 18:228,521+58
7 Aug 2026, 19:238,463-1
7 Aug 2026, 10:008,464no change
7 Aug 2026, 09:548,464first reading

Engagement

28 posts held, back to 26 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 24 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
151.4%
avg views ÷ 8,546 subscribers
Avg views / post
12,900
13 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.716%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
13
of 28 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 August 2026
Posts held28 (26 June 202627 August 2026)
Views total168,230
Reactions total1,204
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken28 Aug 2026, 17:06 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

2,873 reactions across 28 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍91131.7%
🔥59620.7%
😁51718.0%
34111.9%
🤔2378.25%
🤯1334.63%
💩832.89%
👎301.04%
😢250.87%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 28 of the 28 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,873reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 28 most recent posts we hold, published 26 June 2026 to 27 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

27 Aug 2026, 06:57 UTC≈2,080 views82 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Финальный босс

47😁27👍7🤔1

26 Aug 2026, 11:35 UTC≈2,930 views87 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Ядру Linux исполнилось 35 лет 25 августа 1991 года Линус Торвальдс объявил о создании рабочего прототипа ОС Linux. Первый публичный выпуск (версия 0.0.1) состоялся 17 сентября 1991 года — сжатый архив занимал 62 Кб и содержал около 10 тысяч строк кода. Сегодня кодовая база ядра Linux превышает 44 млн строк. За 35 лет проект прошёл путь от простой системы для процессоров i386 до основы мировой ИТ-инфраструктуры, суп

🔥4923👍13🤔2

24 Aug 2026, 10:30 UTC≈3,200 views145 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Проект Python получил официальную документацию на русском языке Сообщество этого популярного языка программирования заявило, что отныне документацию можно будет официально почитать на русском языке: «огромное спасибо всем, кто внёс свой вклад, посвятив своё время и опыт переводу. Подобные вклады сообщества помогают сделать Python более доступным для людей во всем мире». Linux Club

👍111🔥29👎41

21 Aug 2026, 12:09 UTC≈4,170 views102 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Linux 7.3 ускоряет многозадачность на старом железе Текущие ядра имеют узкое место при работе с cgroup — группами процессов, организованными в иерархию. Когда пользователь запускает сразу много процессов, из-за такой структуры планировщику приходится проходить несколько уровней, прежде чем выбрать следующую задачу. На современном железе это не ощущается, чего нельзя сказать про старые ПК. Поэтому были выпущены патч

🔥85🤔8😁71👍1

17 Aug 2026, 08:08 UTC≈38,200 views111 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Linux продолжает урезать поддержку очень старых CPU: без TSC теперь никак Начиная с Linux 7.0 ядро потеряло поддержку процессоров Intel 486, а теперь появился коммит, который делает поддержку Time Stamp Counter (TSC) обязательной для всех x86-процессоров при сборке ядра. Речь идет о специальном 64-битном счетчике времени внутри процессора. Он значительно быстрее альтернативных HPET и ACPI PM, поскольку считывается

😁56👍26😢16🤔121

14 Aug 2026, 08:24 UTC≈40,500 views121 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Epic Games готовит нативный игровой лаунчер под Linux Это подтвердил официальный сотрудник компании в Discord, добавив «нам нужно сделать больше, чем просто предоставить ПО для запуска» – видимо, речь идет об интеграции Proton или похожего слоя трансляции, а также адаптации Easy Anti-Cheat. Он также добавил, что релиз уже скоро – но точных дат не назвал. На данный момент игры из Epic Games можно запускать на Linux

🔥80👍346💩1

12 Aug 2026, 10:01 UTC≈4,980 views78 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

OpenAI выпустила приложение ChatGPT под Linux Судя по всему, это очередная «электрон-оболочка». Поддерживаются ChatGPT, ChatGPT Work и AI-агент Codex. Приложение пока в бете, оно доступно для загрузки в форматах deb и rpm в сборках для x64 и ARM64. Поддерживаются Ubuntu 24.04/26.04, Debian 13 и Fedora 43/44. Скачать его можно на официальном сайте OpenAI при заходе на него с соответствующих дистрибутивов. Linux Club

😁43💩22🤔73👍2🔥1

10 Aug 2026, 09:32 UTC≈5,250 views50 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Представлен ReTransmission — форк популярного BitTorrent-клиента Transmission Причины его появления – в давних разногласих между сопровождающими оригинала, в частности по поводу добавления новых мэйнтейнеров. Об этом сообщил Чарльз Керр, один из ключевых разработчиков проекта. ReTransmission сохранит старую базу – код и история разработки Transmission перенесены в новый репозиторий на GitHub. Останутся все интерфей

🤔427👍1

8 Aug 2026, 10:02 UTC≈47,700 views71 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Новый Spectre: под ударом все чипы на AM4 и часть на AM5 Уязвимость затрагивает все чипы от Zen 1 до 4, то есть от Ryzen 1000 до 8000. Нашли её специалисты Массачусетского технологического института, AMD подтвердила проблему. Атаку назвали TONTOU (Time-of-Neutralization to Time-of-Use), затрагивает она только пользователей Linux, позволяя обойти механизм защиты Safe-RET, предназначенный для отражения атак класса Spe

🤯39👍16😁132🤔1

7 Aug 2026, 13:56 UTC≈4,000 views80 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Никаких ИИ-патчей в drivers-раздел ядра Linux Грег Кроа-Хартман, отвечающий за поддержку стабильной и staging-веток ядра Linux, запретил принимать в раздел drivers/staging патчи, сгенерированные ИИ-инструментами. Раздел staging изначально задумывался как учебная площадка для новичков, где они учатся вручную исправлять мелкие недочёты в коде. Автоматическая чистка с помощью нейросетей лишает начинающих разработчиков

44👍32🤔3💩1

5 Aug 2026, 10:54 UTC≈4,640 views67 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Google опубликовала официальные сборки Chrome для Linux ARM Они доступны на официальном сайте браузера в пакетах deb и rpm. Ранее Chrome под Linux официально выходил только для x86_64, а для архитектуры ARM64 были доступны только сторонние сборки Chromium. Официальный Chrome позволяет подключаться к аккаунту Google с полноценной синхронизацией и интеграцией сервисов корпорации. Также в сборку интегрирован CDM-модуль

🤔30👍24👎82💩2😁1

3 Aug 2026, 11:02 UTC≈5,030 views119 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Проект Kakehashi позволит запускать ПО с macOS на Linux Речь идет о трансляторе на Rust, который позволяет выполнять исполняемые ARM64-файлы macOS в формате Mach-O на Linux-системах также на ARM64. При этом код выполняется нативно, без JIT-компиляции и эмуляции, используется только подмена системных вызовов для libSystem и обработка исключений. Уже удалось запустить macOS-версии 7-Zip, 7zz и curl, а также выполнить

🔥73🤔28👍152💩1

Showing the 12 most recent of 28 posts we hold for @linuxklub. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 37,370 of 1,626,935entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Linux Club” (@linuxklub), 8,546 subscribers as measured 29 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/linuxklub.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.