Channel
@lionyeon
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
88subscribers
+10 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003893317592 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @lionyeon |
| Created | Between 1 February 2026 and 31 July 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 3 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 9 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 3 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/lionyeon |
Music — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 27 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 92% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 3 Nov 2026, 07:49 | 88 | -1 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 04:01 | 89 | -1 |
| 13 Oct 2026, 04:31 | 90 | +4 |
| 2 Oct 2026, 10:21 | 86 | +2 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 08:33 | 84 | +2 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 00:04 | 82 | +1 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 02:56 | 81 | +2 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 03:28 | 79 | +1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 09:31 | 78 | first reading |
14 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
111 reactions across 13 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5222324582874121799 | 33 | 29.7% | |
| custom 5400266950553147209 | 30 | 27.0% | |
| ❤ | 17 | 15.3% | |
| 💘 | 16 | 14.4% | |
| 🍓 | 15 | 13.5% |
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 111 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🌟 oh ! soyeon just said hi : bubble 🌟 on aug 10 : Сонбэним, не забывай наносить солнцезащитный крем SY: Все, когда выходите, тоже наносите солнцезащитный крем на тело? : Было весело? На концерте 2PM? SY: Ага.. И мой первый в жизни концерт тоже был концерт..2PM..хехе : Соёни: Все...ли? Да, онни, я в последнее время очень загораю, легко сильно загореть SY: Удивительно то, что я только во время Mono загорела около …
послушайте песню красавицы, это может стать хитом ❤️🩹 ютуб: https://youtu.be/kO_AAjLbiys?si=K7rwf0kLVE9aJ6NT спотифай: https://open.spotify.com/track/2QPeSmdAS0O7EkZKLYgR5E?si=AWO3VqZfQzeRXWx-0ZVcTg&utm_source=copy-link
❤4custom 54002669505531472093
🌟 oh ! soyeon just said hi : instagram 🌟 on aug 9
custom 54002669505531472093custom 52223245828741217992
🌟 oh ! soyeon just said hi : youtube 🌟 on aug 9 new video 'bout Lolla
custom 52223245828741217993custom 54002669505531472093🍓1
тред полностью в комментариях ! буду рада реакциям, репостам и вашим впечатлениям 🤩
custom 52223245828741217995🍓1
“ lionyeon • • #thread 🤩 (mini) ~ i-dle thread from me ! 🦋• my, with love •🦋 ✦₊˚.⋆ 아이들에게, для i-dle ⋆｡°✩ 사랑을 담아. — с любовью🌟
💘9custom 52223245828741217998🍓3custom 54002669505531472093❤2
готовы к треду??
custom 54002669505531472095🍓2custom 52223245828741217992
карина роблокс, так же известная как карамбейби, сделала косплей на соён
💘5custom 54002669505531472094custom 52223245828741217993❤1🍓1
тредики переехали из закрепа вот сюда, не теряйте <3
custom 54002669505531472093
my “i never die” & “i love”, you will always be iconic
custom 52223245828741217994❤2🍓2💘1custom 54002669505531472091
Posted without readable text
❤2🍓1custom 52223245828741217991custom 54002669505531472091
фух, я разобралась с обновлением и придумала новое оформление, ждите дроп🫰
custom 52223245828741217993
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @lionyeon. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 27 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 21 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“✧) lionyeon (✧” (@lionyeon), 88 subscribers as measured 3 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lionyeon.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.