Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Lisa Stavr.dsgn//'

Channel

Lisa Stavr.dsgn//'

@lisa_stavr

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

109subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001896047743
TypeChannel
Username@lisa_stavr
CreatedBetween 1 November 2022 and 31 August 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 September 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/lisa_stavr

Growth

109112110.58 August 2026 — 109 subscribers9 August 2026 — 109 subscribers23 August 2026 — 112 subscribers31 August 2026 — 111 subscribers8 September 2026 — 110 subscribers16 September 2026 — 109 subscribers8 August 202616 September 2026
6 measurements spanning 39 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 109–112 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Sept 2026, 04:01109-1
8 Sept 2026, 12:01110-1
31 Aug 2026, 07:43111-1
23 Aug 2026, 09:11112+3
9 Aug 2026, 07:46109no change
8 Aug 2026, 09:32109first reading

Engagement

5 posts held, back to 13 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 5 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

50 reactions across 5 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1836.0%
🔥1632.0%
❤‍🔥714.0%
👍510.0%
🥰24.00%
🦄24.00%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 5 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 50 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 5 most recent posts we hold, published 13 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 09:20 UTC48 views6 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Между прочим на канале пополнение! Всем очень рада 🥹 Скоро я планирую обновить пост знакомство, т. к. вайб и эстетика немного изменились с 2024 🍄 Продолжаю понемногу показывать работы с Перевёрстки у Маунтера Вернее, эти работы были начаты ещё в июне на воркшопе, посвящённому японскому плакату Возвращалась к ним несколько раз, дополняла деталями, смотрела, и вот сейчас этап, которым я более менее довольна Хочется е

🔥3🦄21

3 Aug 2026, 12:41 UTC274 views9 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Впервые приняла участие в конкурсе Бифри ко дню всех влюблённых) Мне сраза на ум пришли ассоциации с языком жестов, который позволяет сказать о любви без слов Если моя работа вам правда понравилась, проголосовать можно здесь)) 🩷 https://cocreate.befree.ru/gallery/12687 🩷

6🥰2🔥1

1 Aug 2026, 10:14 UTC115 views11 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

🌝 Хотела бы показать вам два моих новых экспериментальных плаката, сделанных на воркшопе по польскому плакату у маунтера 🌝 Польский плакат отличает ручная графика, иногда он целиком нарисован от руки: и буквы, и иллюстрация; иногда сопровождается наборным шрифтом 🥺 Польский плакат отличается свободой и креативностью. Но даже в этой свободе нужно соблюсти грамотную композицию и иерархию 👀

5❤‍🔥4🔥2

25 Jul 2026, 16:19 UTC148 views12 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

У меня тут вообще-то много новостей! Прохожу сейчас Перевёрстку - двухнедельную практику от Маунтера. Делаем разные плакаты, изучаем приёмы. Этим летом я сделала большой упор на прокачку навыков в типографики, стараюсь долго и вдумчиво сидеть над каждым плакатом Это несколько вариантов только одного задания. Всё ещё будет дорабатываться 🩷 Это задание - афиша выдуманного события в выдуманном кинотеатре (никакого кин

👍5🔥43

13 Jul 2026, 11:30 UTC185 views12 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Случились kinda ✨bright weekends✨ ✅ В субботу сначала встретилась с ребятами из Design Talks, я наконец-то попробовала модную кашу в Surf Coffee (спойлер: не могу сказать, что очень впечатлилась ею, я фанат гурьевской каши из Теремка 🥞) ✅ Далее пошла на Spletenie fest в АТС ✨ Больше всего понравился воркшоп Виолетты по чеканке из фольги. Мне нравятся такие металлические эффекты, все материалы можно купить домой, та

🔥63❤‍🔥3

Showing the 5 most recent of 5 posts we hold for @lisa_stavr. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Lisa Stavr.dsgn//'” (@lisa_stavr), 109 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lisa_stavr.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.