#群发 #私信 #强拉 价格低 效果好 性价比高 老客户继续来单

Channel
刘亚群发|电报拉人|私信代发|会员代开@liuya
@liuyaqunfa
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
556subscribers
-513 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001586344144 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @liuyaqunfa |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/liuyaqunfa |
Topic
Marketing & affiliate — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 94% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Sept 2026, 03:17 | 556 | -62 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 09:18 | 618 | -169 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 22:47 | 787 | -37 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 16:44 | 824 | -235 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 11:52 | 1,059 | -1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 16:28 | 1,060 | -9 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 00:17 | 1,069 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 22:26 | 1,069 | first reading |
Engagement
11 posts held, back to 8 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 11 posts for this entry, the most recent from 29 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 5s
- Average length
- 5s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,121 reactions across 7 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 12.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🤩 | 145 | 12.9% | |
| ❤🔥 | 129 | 11.5% | |
| 🔥 | 129 | 11.5% | |
| 👍 | 124 | 11.1% | |
| 💯 | 124 | 11.1% | |
| ❤ | 120 | 10.7% | |
| 🎉 | 118 | 10.5% | |
| 😍 | 118 | 10.5% | |
| 🥰 | 114 | 10.2% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,121 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 8 May 2026 to 29 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
1、总系列 @minzong 民总 1888U @yuezong 月总/岳总 1888U @pozong 破总 888U @gunzong 棍总 888U @duizong 兑总 888U @pinzong 品总 888U @niaozong 鸟总 888U 2、宝系列 @zanbao 赞宝 888U @zabao 杂宝 888U @quebao 雀宝 888U @suanbao 蒜宝 888U @biaobao 飙宝 888U @zuanbao 钻宝 888U @wengbao 翁宝 888U 3、老系列 @laoza 老杂 888U @laokou 老蔻 1888U @laohun 老魂 888U @laogai 老盖 1888U @laosa 老萨 1888U @laotun 老豚 888U @laozao 老早 888U @laonue 老虐 888U 4.大系列 @daran 大燃 888U @darou 大肉 …
❤1
Telegram必备的搜索引擎,极搜JISOU帮你精准找到,想要的群组、频道、视频、音乐 👉 t.me/jisou2?start=a_8173719693
现在群发效果卡卡好 老客户打骨折哦!
❤1
6.1 快乐,希望千帆过尽,仍是少年
需要这种博彩通道的联系我
❤3
世界杯快来了,战备世界杯,从广告开始! 私信优惠活动来啦【限时优惠】 私信普通号 充值优惠套餐: 充值3w条 赠送群发周套餐一 价值150U 充值10w条 赠送群发半月套餐 价值288U 充值30w条 赠送群发包月套餐三 价值568U 充值50w条 赠送群发包月套餐五 价值888U 会员号发【不费数据】: 0.05U/条 (2000条起) 0.045U/条 (一万条起) 私信价格表 群发价格表 不止博彩 各行各业均可参与. 六年引流老品牌 为你的广告引流保驾护航! 刘亚ID认准: @liuya
❤1
俄罗斯门户官方网站认证验证服务 💎 一个稳定的核心,连接四方,持续释放价值 🪪 我们正式推出一项全新的Telegram验证服务,旨在为优质频道和用户提供更具辨识度的身份认证标识。您的个人资料或频道将获得一个不仅独特且引人注目,还能清晰区分的标识——所有人都能看到这个标识。✅ 💬 定价 永久/频道:788usdt 🐱 @liuya
置顶 - 业务导航- 一键搜索 刘亚永久用户名 @liuya 刘亚业务内容: 引流代发 专注群发私信引流: ⭐️ 群发价格 ⭐️ 私信代发 ⭐️ 群僵尸粉 ⭐️ 强拉活人 ⭐️ 机器搭建 ⭐️ 账号出售 ⭐️ 频道出售 ⭐️ 监听私信 ⭐️ 频道浏览 ⭐️ 会员代开 ⭐️ 群在线粉 ⭐️ 引流软件 飞机各种账号 老号 tdata直登 trx能量租赁|会员代开 群/频道助推 |各国飞机号协议号|群组强拉/频道上粉|+888匿名号|图标定制 服务无止境!
🤩44💯43🔥43😍43❤40❤🔥40👍39🎉38
在线成员安排到位
🤩52🥰48🔥47❤🔥40😍40🎉39👍39💯39
接私信 群 轰炸
❤🔥49🤩49👍46💯42❤41🎉41🔥39🥰35
Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @liuyaqunfa. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 14
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 2
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 12
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@liuyaqunfa named 14 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Evidenced gone
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026 · confirmed gone 20 August 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026 · confirmed gone 21 August 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“刘亚群发|电报拉人|私信代发|会员代开@liuya” (@liuyaqunfa), 556 subscribers as measured 12 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/liuyaqunfa.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.