Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Надихаючі_Читання

Channel

Надихаючі_Читання

@live_readings

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

3,010subscribers

-15 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001828918957
TypeChannel
Username@live_readings
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 September 2026
Measurements held14
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/live_readings

Topic

Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 15 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

3,0103,0253,017.56 August 2026 — 3,025 subscribers7 August 2026 — 3,019 subscribers10 August 2026 — 3,024 subscribers12 August 2026 — 3,020 subscribers16 August 2026 — 3,017 subscribers19 August 2026 — 3,018 subscribers22 August 2026 — 3,017 subscribers25 August 2026 — 3,023 subscribers28 August 2026 — 3,018 subscribers31 August 2026 — 3,024 subscribers3 September 2026 — 3,020 subscribers9 September 2026 — 3,019 subscribers13 September 2026 — 3,016 subscribers16 September 2026 — 3,010 subscribers6 August 202616 September 2026
14 measurements spanning 41 days, net -15. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,008–3,027 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Sept 2026, 14:013,010-6
13 Sept 2026, 02:023,016-3
9 Sept 2026, 07:213,019-1
3 Sept 2026, 16:373,020-4
31 Aug 2026, 03:433,024+6
28 Aug 2026, 07:263,018-5
25 Aug 2026, 15:533,023+6
22 Aug 2026, 12:483,017-1
19 Aug 2026, 03:233,018+1
16 Aug 2026, 03:283,017-3
12 Aug 2026, 21:143,020-4
10 Aug 2026, 00:453,024+5
7 Aug 2026, 05:403,019-6
6 Aug 2026, 13:213,025first reading

Engagement

21 posts held, back to 22 November 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 21 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

722 reactions across 21 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 59.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
43159.7%
❤‍🔥11315.7%
👍527.20%
💯435.96%
🔥364.99%
🙏324.43%
30.416%
🏆30.416%
👌20.277%
😍20.277%
🕊10.139%
😱10.139%
🤔10.139%
🤯10.139%
🥰10.139%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 21 of the 21 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 722 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 22 November 2025 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 21 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @live_readings. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 21 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 22 November 2025 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 05:47 UTC293 views24 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

17❤‍🔥6🥰1

31 Jul 2026, 18:43 UTC390 views34 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026

Справжня сила християнина народжується тоді, коли він визнає свою безпорадність перед Богом, віддаючи себе в Його руки! @live_readings

25❤‍🔥6🏆3

18 Jul 2026, 14:57 UTC627 views29 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Соцмережі не руйнують стосунки. Вони роблять набагато гірше. Вони постійно показують, що десь існує кращий та багатший чоловік, красивіша жінка, щасливіші пари. Поступово людина перестає цінувати те, що має, і починає шукати те, чого, можливо, навіть не існує. Так ми опиняємося в ілюзії кращого життя, де немає проблем. Однак справжнє щастя — це не вічний пошук нового, а вдосконалення того, що вже є. І поки одні вк

17🔥8👍2😍1😱1

22 Jun 2026, 17:44 UTC921 views38 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Одна дівчина звернулася до психолога із запитанням: чому на початку стосунків усе нагадує кіно, а згодом починаються буденність та байдужість? Психолог дав їй завдання: щодня дивитися на свого партнера так, ніби вони щойно познайомилися. Не буквально, а вчитися помічати те, що стало непомітним через звичку: погляди, жести, сміх, піклування в дрібницях. Дівчина почала практикувати це і помітила, що знову чекає на його

31❤‍🔥5🕊1😍1

31 May 2026, 18:21 UTC≈1,060 views52 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Потім? Потім чай холоне. Потім люди старіють. Потім життя закінчується. І правда в тому, що «потім» часто перетворюється на «ніколи». Ми часто переконуємо себе в тому, що маємо ще багато часу, але кожного дня втрачаємо час, який нам ніколи не повернути. Якщо це важливо для вас, почніть це робити прямо зараз! Живіть зараз! Любіть зараз! Творіть зараз, адже «потім» може не бути! @live_readings

💯2319🙏7❤‍🔥3

4 May 2026, 15:40 UTC≈1,250 views35 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Чи успадкують Царство Боже «хороші люди»? Погляньмо на звичайний стілець 🪑. Він вірно служить людям і не просить нічого натомість. На нього можна сісти, на нього можна опертися чи використати як підставку, але стілець не успадковує Царство Боже бо він не вірить в Ісуса. Біблія каже, що спасіння починається з віри в Ісуса Христа, а не через людські добрі вчинки. «…щоб кожен, хто вірує в Нього, не загинув, але мав жи

🙏199💯4🔥2🤯1

21 Apr 2026, 17:11 UTC≈1,010 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @Bible_channels_UAPhoto

Хочеш глибше, ніж просто поверхневе? «Вічні питання» — тут про найважливе: ✔ Про Біблію без міфів ✔ Про зрозумілі тлумачення ✔ Про те, що важко передати в перекладі ✔ Про слова Біблії ✔ Про духовний зріст і мотивацію 👉 Підписуйся 📲 https://t.me/SutProS

6❤‍🔥2🔥1

19 Apr 2026, 16:47 UTC899 views25 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Олександр, Цезар, Карл Великий і я заснували імперії... на силі. Ісус Христос заснував свою імперію на любові, і донині мільйони людей готові за Нього померти. Наполеон Бонапарт @live_readings

13❤‍🔥5👍52

11 Apr 2026, 04:02 UTC≈1,190 views36 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Як можна описати кохання? Одного разу хтось входить у твоє життя, зовсім чужий, і стає для тебе таким важливим, наче він нікуди й не йшов. І хоча ви знайомі зовсім мало, тобі здається, що ти кохав цю людину все життя. Ніби щось всередині тебе вже впізнало її ще до того, як розум встиг це усвідомити. Наче вона не стільки увійшла у твоє життя, скільки просто повернулася в нього. І ти не можеш це пояснити, хоча в такій

22❤‍🔥14

4 Apr 2026, 04:03 UTC≈1,120 views32 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Якщо Бог твій партнер, будуй грандіозні плани! @live_readings

18❤‍🔥4👍4🔥4👌2

14 Mar 2026, 05:04 UTC≈1,540 views33 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Усе, що ми можемо дати людям, — це плід часу, проведеного з Ісусом. @live_readings

25👍5💯3

28 Feb 2026, 05:02 UTC≈1,940 views35 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Ми часто судимо про результат, ігноруючи процес. Легко оцінювати чиїсь дії, не знаючи обставин, які до них призвели. Вибір, який здається нам помилковим, міг бути найкращим із трьох найгірших варіантів. Не поспішаймо з висновками — за кожним рішенням стоїть невидима боротьба. «Рішення — це лише верхівка айсберга, а обставини та сумніви — величезна глиба під водою». @live_readings

25❤‍🔥7💯3

Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @live_readings. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Надихаючі_Читання” (@live_readings), 3,010 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/live_readings.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.