Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Опознание ЕАО (Биробиджан)

Channel

Опознание ЕАО (Биробиджан)

@livebir_not

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Advertising · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

15,683subscribers

+28 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001459779064
TypeChannel
Username@livebir_not
Created1 May 2019measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 September 2026
Measurements held29
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 8 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/livebir_not

Growth

15,58815,68315,635.55 August 2026 — 15,655 subscribers6 August 2026 — 15,655 subscribers8 August 2026 — 15,654 subscribers9 August 2026 — 15,653 subscribers10 August 2026 — 15,649 subscribers11 August 2026 — 15,639 subscribers12 August 2026 — 15,636 subscribers13 August 2026 — 15,625 subscribers14 August 2026 — 15,624 subscribers16 August 2026 — 15,617 subscribers17 August 2026 — 15,611 subscribers18 August 2026 — 15,607 subscribers19 August 2026 — 15,606 subscribers20 August 2026 — 15,598 subscribers21 August 2026 — 15,588 subscribers22 August 2026 — 15,594 subscribers24 August 2026 — 15,589 subscribers25 August 2026 — 15,590 subscribers26 August 2026 — 15,588 subscribers27 August 2026 — 15,589 subscribers28 August 2026 — 15,624 subscribers29 August 2026 — 15,637 subscribers30 August 2026 — 15,636 subscribers31 August 2026 — 15,651 subscribers1 September 2026 — 15,641 subscribers2 September 2026 — 15,632 subscribers3 September 2026 — 15,627 subscribers5 September 2026 — 15,637 subscribers8 September 2026 — 15,683 subscribers5 August 20268 September 2026
29 measurements spanning 34 days, net +28. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 15,574–15,697 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 29
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Sept 2026, 22:5915,683+46
5 Sept 2026, 17:1915,637+10
3 Sept 2026, 20:1815,627-5
2 Sept 2026, 11:4715,632-9
1 Sept 2026, 15:1215,641-10
31 Aug 2026, 13:0815,651+15
30 Aug 2026, 11:4515,636-1
29 Aug 2026, 13:4215,637+13
28 Aug 2026, 10:5515,624+35
27 Aug 2026, 07:3415,589+1
26 Aug 2026, 04:0815,588-2
25 Aug 2026, 06:1415,590+1
24 Aug 2026, 06:1715,589-5
22 Aug 2026, 15:1715,594+6
21 Aug 2026, 08:4215,588-10
20 Aug 2026, 10:0215,598-8
19 Aug 2026, 11:5415,606-1
18 Aug 2026, 13:3815,607-4
17 Aug 2026, 12:4415,611-6
16 Aug 2026, 05:1315,617first reading

Engagement

166 posts held, back to 3 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 70 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
8.22%
avg views ÷ 15,683 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,290
128 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.774%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
128
of 166 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 101 of 128 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 September 2026
Posts held166 (3 August 20263 September 2026)
Views total164,918
Reactions total1,021
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken3 Sept 2026, 10:20 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
3m 35s
Average length
13s

Measured directly from 16 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

1,442 reactions across 123 posts, in 21 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 24.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤬35524.6%
🙏20714.4%
🤡17912.4%
😱16611.5%
15911.0%
🤔966.66%
😁704.85%
🤣523.61%
👍392.70%
🔥372.57%
😢221.53%
😎161.11%
🤩100.693%
custom 520890188665614752270.485%
🏆70.485%
custom 520852482718226419260.416%
🤝40.277%
💔30.208%
🕊30.208%
🤯30.208%
1 further kind10.069%

Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 135 of the 166 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,468 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 166 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 3 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Advertising

Ad load
5.42%
9 of 166 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
9
posts carrying an erid · 3 distinct tokens
Median views · ads
1,370
over 9 measured posts
Median views · rest
1,380
over 157 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. They are printed side by side with the count behind each rather than as a ratio: an ad and an ordinary post are not otherwise matched — for topic, for length, for hour of day — so the gap between them is a description of two groups and not the effect of one being an ad.

Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
eridPostsFirst seenLast seen
2SDnjdD8GRh413 August 202620 August 2026
2SDnje5gYvw39 August 202623 August 2026
2SDnjdoS5rT222 August 202629 August 2026

A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.

Measured over the 166 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 3 September 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

3 Sept 2026, 09:02 UTC189 viewsread 3 September 2026
Photo

🧐 Начни свой день правильно Живешь в Хабаровске? Знакомые оттуда? Или просто интересуешься новостями всего Дальнего Востока? Тогда тебе сюда — канал «ЛАЙВ Хабаровск» в МАХ (6+). Здесь публикуют самые яркие и свежие новости города и области. У нас можно найти: — Эксклюзивные материалы — Главные и срочные новости — Крутые розыгрыши — Оплата за контент от очевидцев ➡️ Жми ссылку и подписывайся: https://max.ru/join/x

3 Sept 2026, 06:10 UTC434 views11 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

👁‍🗨 Пропал подросток! УМВД России по Еврейской автономной области устанавливается местонахождение 16-летней Шакировой Арины Арсеновны, которая 31 августа 2026 года ушла из дома в Биробиджане и до сих пор не вернулась. Приметы: на вид 14–15 лет, рост 170 см, худощавого телосложения, волосы тёмные, глаза карие. Была одета: серая кофта с капюшоном, светло-голубые штаны, чёрные кроссовки с белыми полосами. Если вам чт

😱6🙏3custom 52085248271822641922

3 Sept 2026, 05:32 UTC478 views7 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

📱 Присылайте новости из ЕАО — и мы заплатим Вы стали очевидцем необычного события, ДТП, происшествия или просто сняли что-то интересное в Биробиджане или районах области? Присылайте нам! Мы принимаем фото и видео с мест событий, а за лучший и эксклюзивный контент — платим. Как это работает: — присылайте новость в редакцию по номеру 89004159365 — если вы увидели ваш пост в ленте, напишите нам, и мы договоримся об о

3👍2🔥2

3 Sept 2026, 04:02 UTC658 views12 reactionsread 3 September 2026

👁‍🗨 В Биробиджане выявили три факта незаконной продажи алкоголя ночью Благодаря сигналам неравнодушных жителей полиция пресекла нарушения в трёх торговых точках города — спиртное продавали после 22:00. На продавцов составили административные протоколы, им грозят крупные штрафы. 🤬 — наказывать таких 😱 — треш 👇 Больше городских обсуждений с опознанием

🤬6🤡4😱2

3 Sept 2026, 02:02 UTC867 views14 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

👁‍🗨 Дети ломают потерянные номера машин в Биробиджане «Дети ломают потерянные номера от машин. Кто потерял свой номер — уже не найдут, их ломают на ул. 40 лет Победы», — пишут подписчики. 🤬 — руки оторвать 😱 — зачееем? 👇 Больше городских обсуждений с опознанием

🤬131

2 Sept 2026, 14:56 UTC790 views7 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Forwarded from @birariaPhoto

🗞 Российская газета: «Встречи на ВЭФ помогут "Бирарии" выйти на новый уровень — Александр Музыка» Сооснователь культурно-туристического бренда Приамурья поделился с федеральными журналистами ожиданиями от участия в Восточном экономическом форуме (12+): «Для меня участие в Восточном экономическом форуме — это возможность заявить о "Бирарии" на самом высоком уровне. Показать культуру коренных народов Приамурья как жи

🤡61

2 Sept 2026, 09:00 UTC≈1,090 views0 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

🤔Ищешь кому продать, но не можешь найти? Заглядывай в наш чат «Купи-продай» во Вконтакте (12+). Именно здесь можно продать вещи, купить редкие товары или обменяться услугами. Почему у нас удобно? *️⃣Быстро — объявление увидят сотни местных жителей; *️⃣Бесплатно — требуется лишь войти в чат; *️⃣Надёжно — модерация проверяет подозрительные посты; *️⃣Локально — только Биробиджан и ЕАО. Переходи по ссылке и выбирай ну

2 Sept 2026, 04:02 UTC≈1,200 views5 reactionsread 3 September 2026

👁‍🗨 Вода на Амуре в ЕАО продолжает уходить На 2 сентября гидрологическая обстановка в области остаётся контролируемой. Уровни воды снижаются по прогнозу. За сутки на Амуре зафиксирован спад: у Екатерино-Никольского — минус 18 см, у Нагибово — минус 17 см, у Ленинского — минус 3 см, у Нижнеспасского — минус 1 см. В Смидовичском районе сохраняются последствия паводка: подтоплены 6 приусадебных участков, 173 дачных уч

🙏41

Showing the 12 most recent of 166 posts we hold for @livebir_not. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

20 Aug 2026, 04:50 UTCAnonymous Poll209 voters

Появилась горячая вода?

  1. Да66%
  2. Нет34%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 166 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 3 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Опознание ЕАО (Биробиджан)” (@livebir_not), 15,683 subscribers as measured 8 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/livebir_not.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.