کدومش و دوس دارین
- لیپ گلاس76%
- نگین24%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Signed Meliiika

Channel
@liwiyouuu
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
11,015subscribers
+1,029 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1002029522856 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @liwiyouuu |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 25 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 10 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/liwiyouuu |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Sept 2026, 07:00 | 11,015 | -86 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 22:58 | 11,101 | +909 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 08:19 | 10,192 | -24 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 00:37 | 10,216 | -18 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 22:04 | 10,234 | -16 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 00:58 | 10,250 | -20 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 21:28 | 10,270 | -20 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 23:13 | 10,290 | -11 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 00:55 | 10,301 | -24 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 02:35 | 10,325 | -26 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 03:16 | 10,351 | -13 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 01:55 | 10,364 | -10 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 04:37 | 10,374 | -13 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 02:08 | 10,387 | -12 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 11:18 | 10,399 | -34 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 00:52 | 10,433 | -27 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 21:44 | 10,460 | -25 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 19:37 | 10,485 | -19 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 17:07 | 10,504 | +494 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 08:47 | 10,010 | first reading |
546 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 36 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 259 of 402 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 546 (7 August 2026 – 29 August 2026) |
| Views total | 288,433 |
| Reactions total | 2,565 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 29 Aug 2026, 17:20 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 12 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
3,659 reactions across 343 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1,295 | 35.4% | |
| 🤣 | 783 | 21.4% | |
| 👍 | 617 | 16.9% | |
| 🍓 | 345 | 9.43% | |
| 👎 | 223 | 6.09% | |
| 😭 | 219 | 5.99% | |
| 💋 | 95 | 2.60% | |
| 😘 | 39 | 1.07% | |
| 🐳 | 24 | 0.656% | |
| 🤬 | 19 | 0.519% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 365 of the 546 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,659 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 546 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 29 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
کدومش و دوس دارین
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Signed Meliiika
موافقید گیفت و به جای لیپ گلاس از این نگینها که ترند شده بذارم!؟
Signed Meliiika
من لیزر کردم
Signed Meliiika
ملیکا تو خط ریش تو با چی شیو میکنیی منظورم کنار گوشتهه
Signed Meliiika
عزیزمممم🥹🤍😘
Signed Meliiika
ملیکا من ذوق بسته مو دارم😂😍ایشالا زود ۳۰ ام شه مرحله بعدی پولمم واریز کنم بفرسییییی واااای😂😂🤌😍 موهامو کرلی میکنم عکس خوشگل میگیرم برات میفرسم 😍😍😍از همه بیشتر خوشحال اون گیفتی ام ک میزاریییی خیلیی خوشم میاد من تاحالا انقده خرید اینترنتی کردم هیچکس اینطوری برام نفرستاده بود بسته خوشگللل💖🤭
Signed Meliiika
من با براش پخشش میکنم با دست اخرش خوب میمالم رو پوست مثل ضد افتاب
Signed Meliiika
ملیکا سیسی کرم با چی بلند کنم😂براش دست بیوتی بلند؟
Signed Meliiika
ملیکا من کارهای گلدوزی میکنم دیوار کوب عقد و تولد، تزئینی و گلدوزی روی کیف و لباس و هر چی دوست دارید میتونید نمونه هاشو بزنید گوگل ایده هاتون و برام بفرستید یا بهم پیام بدید خودم براتون نمونه کارهام و بفرستم میشه بزاری داخل کانالت اینم آیدیمه @Maedeh_0860 لطفا از کسب و کارم حمایت کنید
❤3🍓3
Signed Meliiika
میتونی دو گوشیات و گوجه هم کنی
Signed Meliiika
https://www.instagram.com/reel/DcHAlqfOqdC/?igsi=a2Q4cTF2enR1ZW9s
Signed Meliiika
ملیکااااااا تولد دعوت شدم ایده مدل مو بده تو خونه واسه خودم بزنم سخت نباشه شیگلم هم دارم
❤2
Signed Meliiika
Showing the 12 most recent of 546 posts we hold for @liwiyouuu. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 5 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
کدومش و دوس دارین
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
تا حالا اشک دوس پسراتون و در اوردید!؟
The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
بلوبانک شما هم به مشکل خورده!؟
The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
بذارم!؟
The shares total 105%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
بچهها ریمل اسنس مشکی یا صورتی!؟🩷🖤
The shares total 104%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 546 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 29 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“LIWIYOU🤍” (@liwiyouuu), 11,015 subscribers as measured 10 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/liwiyouuu.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.