Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for space

Channel

space

@lktomcold

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

241subscribers

-17 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002433372651
TypeChannel
Username@lktomcold
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 September 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 8 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/lktomcold

Growth

241258249.57 August 2026 — 258 subscribers8 August 2026 — 258 subscribers15 August 2026 — 253 subscribers23 August 2026 — 249 subscribers30 August 2026 — 245 subscribers8 September 2026 — 241 subscribers7 August 20268 September 2026
6 measurements spanning 31 days, net -17. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 238–261 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Sept 2026, 03:56241-4
30 Aug 2026, 00:04245-4
23 Aug 2026, 17:08249-4
15 Aug 2026, 09:07253-5
8 Aug 2026, 09:16258no change
7 Aug 2026, 19:02258first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 13 March 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

910 reactions across 14 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 17.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🏆16217.8%
custom 521559670128851805014616.0%
custom 535936272999805483613815.2%
custom 540210940132881559513514.8%
custom 540244539232541263413514.8%
🆒10111.1%
custom 5359340881499421451586.37%
353.85%

Custom emoji. 5 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 910 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 13 March 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 11:27 UTC27 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @AnonAskBot

💬 У тебя новое анонимное сообщение! давно подсел? ⬅️ Свайпни для ответа.

7 Aug 2026, 11:22 UTC28 viewsread 8 August 2026

скиньтесь на мел по 5, 10, 20 р +79776813301 тиньк

5 Aug 2026, 19:55 UTC44 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

67 лет в браке, ненавижу её

custom 52155967012885180503

4 Aug 2026, 19:53 UTC52 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

базовый максимум

custom 52155967012885180504

28 Jul 2026, 17:38 UTC100 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026

бубубуэьээбэб

custom 52155967012885180504🏆1🆒1

26 Mar 2026, 07:44 UTC618 views38 reactionsread 8 August 2026

уберите в моей комнате

custom 540210940132881559510🏆8🆒6custom 52155967012885180506custom 53593627299980548364custom 54024453923254126344

24 Mar 2026, 12:10 UTC615 views46 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

🆒12🏆8custom 52155967012885180508custom 54021094013288155958custom 53593627299980548366custom 54024453923254126344

23 Mar 2026, 18:17 UTC479 views49 reactionsread 8 August 2026

я тупой выблядок

custom 535936272999805483618custom 54024453923254126349🏆8custom 54021094013288155956🆒5custom 52155967012885180503

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @lktomcold. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“space” (@lktomcold), 241 subscribers as measured 8 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lktomcold.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.