Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 𝐔𝐍𝐈𝐐𝐔𝐄 𝐒𝐂𝐈𝐄𝐍𝐂𝐄 𝐖𝐎𝐑𝐋𝐃📚✍️

Channel

𝐔𝐍𝐈𝐐𝐔𝐄 𝐒𝐂𝐈𝐄𝐍𝐂𝐄 𝐖𝐎𝐑𝐋𝐃📚✍️

@ll_unique_science_world_ll

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

8,757subscribers

-34 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002086291212
TypeChannel
Username@ll_unique_science_world_ll
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded12 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 September 2026
Measurements held12
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/ll_unique_science_world_ll

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Views per post sit far below this size band

4.8 average views per post against 8,757 subscribers — an engagement rate of 0.055%. Across the 327 registered channels in the same cohort — 3,181–9,998 subscribers, posting mainly in Hindi — the middle half sit between 6.54% and 22.4%, with a median of 11.0%.

What this was computed from
Window30 days (22 August 2026 21 September 2026)
Posts measured140 of 140 published in the window (140 exact, 0 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled675
Mature posts only0.13% over 29 posts read at least 24h after publication
Subscribers8,757 measured 15 September 2026
Cohortb3162:hin · 327 channels · p10 2.44% · p25 6.54% · p50 11.0% · p75 22.4% · p90 35.0%
Position in cohort0.000th percentile · 1/200 the cohort median
Uncertainty±0.033% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding
Post languageHindi · 100.0% of the window’s posts

When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or below the 1st percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — below it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.

This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.

Recorded under the key err_low, last confirmed 21 September 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

8,7578,7998,77812 August 2026 — 8,791 subscribers13 August 2026 — 8,793 subscribers16 August 2026 — 8,788 subscribers20 August 2026 — 8,776 subscribers23 August 2026 — 8,786 subscribers26 August 2026 — 8,782 subscribers28 August 2026 — 8,795 subscribers31 August 2026 — 8,799 subscribers3 September 2026 — 8,797 subscribers8 September 2026 — 8,788 subscribers12 September 2026 — 8,760 subscribers15 September 2026 — 8,757 subscribers12 August 202615 September 2026
12 measurements spanning 34 days, net -34. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,751–8,805 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Sept 2026, 15:578,757-3
12 Sept 2026, 07:388,760-28
8 Sept 2026, 13:198,788-9
3 Sept 2026, 12:178,797-2
31 Aug 2026, 11:138,799+4
28 Aug 2026, 16:048,795+13
26 Aug 2026, 01:368,782-4
23 Aug 2026, 06:178,786+10
20 Aug 2026, 04:338,776-12
16 Aug 2026, 22:048,788-5
13 Aug 2026, 05:168,793+2
12 Aug 2026, 08:018,791first reading

Engagement

250 posts held, back to 11 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 16 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
0.054%
avg views ÷ 8,757 subscribers
Avg views / post
4.7
130 posts measured
Reaction rate
47.1%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
130
of 250 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 126 of 130 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026
Posts held250 (11 August 202628 August 2026)
Views total613
Reactions total286
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken28 Aug 2026, 16:17 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
3m 30s
Average length
15s

Measured directly from 14 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

472 reactions across 232 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 11.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🥰5511.7%
4910.4%
🕊4910.4%
🎉449.32%
😁428.90%
😍398.26%
🔥357.42%
🙈285.93%
🐳255.30%
👏234.87%
214.45%
💯214.45%
🤩214.45%
👍204.24%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 238 of the 250 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 472 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 250 most recent posts we hold, published 11 August 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

28 Aug 2026, 16:16 UTC3 views0 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

▫️ सभी स्टूडेंट्स अपनी परीक्षा और स्टेडी मैटेरियल चुनें 👇👇 Join- @twopoll

28 Aug 2026, 16:16 UTC3 views0 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Q.प्रकाश की गति लगभग कितनी होती है?

28 Aug 2026, 16:10 UTC2 views1 reactionsread 28 August 2026

Q. आप किस परीक्षा की तैयारी कर रहे हैं? Q. Which exam are you prepared?

🙈1

28 Aug 2026, 16:05 UTC1 views2 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Video

📝🔕[[क्या आप भी अपना 𝟑𝟎𝐊+ ग्रुप और चैनल फोल्डर में ऐड करना चाहते हो तो अभी मैसेज करें....!]]📘🌈 𝐃𝐌:- [ @MISS_KHILADI_7X ] 👇 [[🇶‌. आपका कौन सा विषय कमजोर है.⁉️]]

1🕊1

28 Aug 2026, 16:01 UTC1 views2 reactionsread 28 August 2026

Q. आप किस परीक्षा की तैयारी कर रहे हैं? Q. Which exam are you prepared?

🥰1🙈1

28 Aug 2026, 15:53 UTC1 views3 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

🔏🖇 भारत में 'शून्य (𝟬)' की अवधारणा का श्रेय किस प्राचीन गणितज्ञ को दिया जाता है .......⁉️ ------------------------------------------------------------ 📲 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗰𝗼𝗻𝗰𝗲𝗽𝘁 𝗼𝗳 𝗭𝗲𝗿𝗼 (𝟬) 𝗶𝗻 𝗜𝗻𝗱𝗶𝗮 𝗶𝘀 𝗴𝗲𝗻𝗲𝗿𝗮𝗹𝗹𝘆 𝗰𝗿𝗲𝗱𝗶𝘁𝗲𝗱 𝘁𝗼 𝘄𝗵𝗶𝗰𝗵 𝗮𝗻𝗰𝗶𝗲𝗻𝘁 𝗺𝗮𝘁𝗵𝗲𝗺𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗰𝗶𝗮𝗻 .........⁉️ ------------------------------------------------------------ ••●┼♥🥀 क्या आप भी हमारे 𝟭𝟬𝗞 + वाले फ़ोल्डर में अपना चैनल ऐड करवाना चाहते हैं तो अभी मैसेज करें 𝗗𝗠 ➛ @Rose_xD

11👍1

28 Aug 2026, 12:07 UTC1 views1 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

2𝐊+ 𝐂hannel को 𝐀dd करवाने के लिए अभी 𝐌assages करे ----- [[ @UNIQUE_XD_GIRL]] Q. श्री राम मंदिर कहां बना है?

🤩1

28 Aug 2026, 11:20 UTC1 views2 reactionsread 28 August 2026

"𝗞𝗛𝗔𝗡 𝗦𝗜𝗥"/𝗠𝗢𝗖𝗞-𝗧𝗘𝗦𝗧 (𝟮𝟬𝟮𝟱-𝟮𝟲)

🎉1🙈1

28 Aug 2026, 10:27 UTC2 views3 reactionsread 28 August 2026

[[ आप जिस विषय का टेस्ट देना चाहते हैं उसके सामने क्लिक करें ..! ]] [[Click on the subject for which you want to take the test..!]]

👍1💯1😍1

28 Aug 2026, 09:34 UTC2 views2 reactionsread 28 August 2026

Q. आप किस परीक्षा की तैयारी कर रहे हैं? Q. Which exam are you prepared?

🎉1🥰1

28 Aug 2026, 08:57 UTC3 views3 reactionsread 28 August 2026

ठीक 5 मिनट बाद लिंक डिलीट होगा जल्दी जुड़े l

🔥1🥰1🙈1

28 Aug 2026, 08:57 UTC4 views2 reactionsread 28 August 2026

"सभी स्टूडेंट्स अपनी परीक्षा और स्टेडी मैटेरियल चुनें.....?" 👇👇👇

🐳1👏1

Showing the 12 most recent of 250 posts we hold for @ll_unique_science_world_ll. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 6 most recent of 70 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

27 Aug 2026, 04:59 UTCAnonymous Quiz6 voters

जीन गन (Biolistics / Gene Gun) विधि का उपयोग मुख्य रूप से किस प्रकार की कोशिकाओं के रूपांतरण के लिए उपयुक्त माना जाता है? 𐤟─ͨ͢─ͧ─ͭ─ͤ𐤟˵꯭ꪲꪳ𓄼꯭𝗦꯭ʜ꯭ᴇ꯭ʀ꯭𝗡꯭ɪ꯭🦁𝅃꯭꯭᳚ꀭ꯭‧₊꯭♡゙꯭꯬꯭

  1. कवक कोशिकाएँ33%
  2. जीवाणु कोशिकाएँ67%
  3. पादप कोशिकाएँ0%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

27 Aug 2026, 04:58 UTCAnonymous Quiz7 voters

रेस्ट्रिक्शन एंडोन्यूक्लिएज 'EcoRI' में 'co' शब्द किसे निरूपित करता है? 𐤟─ͨ͢─ͧ─ͭ─ͤ𐤟˵꯭ꪲꪳ𓄼꯭𝗦꯭ʜ꯭ᴇ꯭ʀ꯭𝗡꯭ɪ꯭🦁𝅃꯭꯭᳚ꀭ꯭‧₊꯭♡゙꯭꯬꯭

  1. Coelenterata43%
  2. Colon57%
  3. Coli0%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

27 Aug 2026, 04:57 UTCAnonymous Quiz7 voters

जेल इलेक्ट्रोफोरेसिस में DNA के खंड किस दिशा में गति करते हैं? 𐤟─ͨ͢─ͧ─ͭ─ͤ𐤟˵꯭ꪲꪳ𓄼꯭𝗦꯭ʜ꯭ᴇ꯭ʀ꯭𝗡꯭ɪ꯭🦁𝅃꯭꯭᳚ꀭ꯭‧₊꯭♡゙꯭꯬꯭

  1. एनोड (+) से कैथोड (-) की ओर29%
  2. कैथोड (-) से एनोड (+) की ओर71%
  3. दोनों दिशाओं में0%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

27 Aug 2026, 04:55 UTCAnonymous Quiz6 voters

Agrobacterium tumefaciens में पाया जाने वाला कौन सा प्लास्मिड पौधों में जीन स्थानांतरण के लिए प्राकृतिक वेक्टर के रूप में प्रयोग किया जाता है? 𐤟─ͨ͢─ͧ─ͭ─ͤ𐤟˵꯭ꪲꪳ𓄼꯭𝗦꯭ʜ꯭ᴇ꯭ʀ꯭𝗡꯭ɪ꯭🦁𝅃꯭꯭᳚ꀭ꯭‧₊꯭♡゙꯭꯬꯭

  1. PUC 180%
  2. pBR3220%

Shares as published, totalling 0%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

27 Aug 2026, 04:54 UTCAnonymous Quiz7 voters

PCR (पॉलीमरेज चेन रिएक्शन) के विभिन्न चरणों का सही क्रम क्या है? 𐤟─ͨ͢─ͧ─ͭ─ͤ𐤟˵꯭ꪲꪳ𓄼꯭𝗦꯭ʜ꯭ᴇ꯭ʀ꯭𝗡꯭ɪ꯭🦁𝅃꯭꯭᳚ꀭ꯭‧₊꯭♡゙꯭꯬꯭

  1. निष्क्रियकरण → विस्तार → तापानुशीलन14%
  2. निष्क्रियकरण → तापानुशीलन → विस्तार86%
  3. तापानुशीलन → निष्क्रियकरण → विस्तार0%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

25 Aug 2026, 05:41 UTCAnonymous Quiz6 voters

हाथीपांव (फाइलेरिया) का संचार/फैलाव किस मच्छर के काटने से होता है? 𐤟─ͨ͢─ͧ─ͭ─ͤ𐤟˵꯭ꪲꪳ𓄼꯭𝗦꯭ʜ꯭ᴇ꯭ʀ꯭𝗡꯭ɪ꯭🦁𝅃꯭꯭᳚ꀭ꯭‧₊꯭♡゙꯭꯬꯭

  1. मादा एनोफिलीज33%
  2. क्यूलेक्स मच्छर (Culex mosquito)67%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 250 most recent posts we hold, published 11 August 2026 to 28 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

📚Upsc Ssc Railway and all exam questions
@upsc_ssc_current_affairs_quizz · 166,039
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 12 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“𝐔𝐍𝐈𝐐𝐔𝐄 𝐒𝐂𝐈𝐄𝐍𝐂𝐄 𝐖𝐎𝐑𝐋𝐃📚✍️” (@ll_unique_science_world_ll), 8,757 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ll_unique_science_world_ll.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.