اللهم صلِ على مُحمّد وعلى ءالِهِ وصحبهِ أجمعين .

Channel
مَلاذُ التَّائِهِينَ💗.
@lll_mi13
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
10,174subscribers
+924 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001853722002 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @lll_mi13 |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 6 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 41 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 6 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/lll_mi13 |
Topic
Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 89% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Nov 2026, 17:50 | 10,174 | +2 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 20:10 | 10,172 | +4 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 22:20 | 10,168 | -3 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 21:35 | 10,171 | +19 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 19:45 | 10,152 | +18 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 22:58 | 10,134 | +7 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 02:20 | 10,127 | +14 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 02:07 | 10,113 | +4 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 01:38 | 10,109 | +7 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 04:39 | 10,102 | -7 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 23:21 | 10,109 | -28 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 22:36 | 10,137 | +6 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 01:49 | 10,131 | +14 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 01:07 | 10,117 | +7 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 22:38 | 10,110 | -7 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 19:06 | 10,117 | -10 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 11:55 | 10,127 | +9 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 10:06 | 10,118 | +10 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 06:36 | 10,108 | +5 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 03:41 | 10,103 | first reading |
Engagement
106 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 41 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 7.37%
- avg views ÷ 10,174 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 749
- 41 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 42
- of 106 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 106 (30 July 2026 – 6 November 2026) |
| Views total | 30,726 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Nov 2026, 10:47 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 7m 48s
- Average length
- 1m 57s
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 7 of 42 posts held from the last 30 days (16.7%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
مَلاذُ التَّائِهِينَ💗. pinned «سلسلة اليوم الخُشوع في الصَلاه🌷.»
ازاي تحس بحلاوة صلاتك🌷.
اللهم أصلح قلوبنا، واجعلنا من أهل الصلاة والخشوع، ولا تجعلنا من الغافلين، وارزقنا حلاوة القرب منك يا ربّ العالمين🌷.
حرفيًا ذولا الأثنين الفيدوهات👆🏻 غيروني كثيييير، وجميييل جدًا شرحهم للـ الخششوع في الصلاة، أتمنى كمان مَ تطنشوة، كم دقيقه تاخذ من وقتكم معلش، للإستفااده🌷🌷.
تفسير جميل لـَ معنى الخشوع في الصلاة💗💗💗💗.
بمافي معنى الكلام أن الله مابيساويهم مع اللي صلواتهم كلها خشوع ومتقنه وصحيحه لكن إن الله تعالى من فضله يجزي هذا العبد على أعماله بأحسن أعماله، ويتجاوز عن كثير من تقصيره وزلاته، وقد تكون له صلاة واحدة عظيمة الخشوع والصدق سببًا في عظيم الأجر والقبول، لكن لا نحدد أن أجر كل صلاة ناقصة سيُجعل مساويًا لتلك الصلاة، وفي نفس الوقت لا يعني ذلك أن المسلم يتساهل في الصلاة أو يقول: يكفيني أن أُحسن صلاة واحدة والباقي عادي. قال ا…
عرفت معلومة اذهلتي و هي : ان الله تعالى يجزي الانسان باحسن عمل ثم يعممه على جميع اعماله ، يعني مثلا قعدت كل حياتك تصلي و نص صلواتك سهو و لكن صلاة وحدة بس كانت قريبة للكمال او كاملة الخشوع لله ، ياخذ الصلاة هذه و يجازيك بها و كأن كل صلواتك كانت كاملة. { وَ لَنَجْزِيَنَّهُمْ أَجْرَهُم بِأَحْسَنِ مَا كَانُوا يَعْمَلُونَ }.
عشان كذا جرب تسأل نفسك: كيف دخلت الصلاة؟ هل دخلتها وأنت مستعجل؟ هل دخلتها وأنت مشغول بالجوال؟ هل دخلتها وأنت تفكر في كل شيء إلا الصلاة؟ أحيانًا المشكلة ليست أن قلبك لا يريد الخشوع... بل أنك لم تعطِ قلبك فرصة يهدأ. جرب شيئًا بسيطًا... قبل الصلاة بدقائق، اترك الجوال. لا تدخل الصلاة وأنت خارج من محادثة طويلة. توضأ بهدوء. ولما تكبّر... لا تجعلها كلمة تقولها تلقائيًا. قل في قلبك: الله أكبر. يعني الله أكبر من المشكلة التي …
كم مرة وقفت تصلي... وجسمك في الصلاة، لكن عقلك في مكان ثاني؟ تكبّر... وتبدأ تقرأ. وفجأة تتذكر رسالة ما رديت عليها. وبعدها تتذكر اختبار بكرة. وبعدين موقف صار لك الصباح. وبعدين تتذكر أنك تصلي فتحاول ترجع... وترجع الأفكار من جديد. وتخلص الصلاة... وتجلس تسأل نفسك: "ليش ما أقدر أخشع؟ لا تستغرب. نحن نعيش يومنا كله وسط ضجيج؛ جوال، إشعارات، دراسة، ناس، أخبار، كلام، تفكير، ومشاعر متراكمة... ثم نريد من قلوبنا، في لحظة واحدة، أن…
كيف اخشع في صلاتي؟! الخشوع في الصلاة... حين تصبح الصلاة مكان راحتك، لا مهمة تريد أن تنتهي منها أحيانًا المشكلة مش إننا ما نعرف كيف نخشع... المشكلة إننا تعودنا على الصلاة لدرجة صرنا نؤديها بدون ما ننتبه لمعناها. نسمع الأذان... نقوم نصلي لأن "لازم نصلي". نقرأ الفاتحة... نركع... نسجد... نسلّم. ثم نرجع لحياتنا. لكن هل وقفنا يومًا نسأل أنفسنا: ليش أنا أصلي؟ مش عشان تنتهي الفريضة. ولا عشان نقول: "خلاص صليت." أنا أصلي... …
الغون الكتم لطفًا وليس أمرًا🌷.
Showing the 12 most recent of 106 posts we hold for @lll_mi13. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@lll_mi13 edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
- First edit seen
- 4 November 2026
- Most recent edit
- 5 November 2026
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 6 posts on @lll_mi13 as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
- First seen missing
- 20 August 2026
- Most recent seen missing
- 6 November 2026
- Median time before seen missing
- 23 hours
- Seen missing in the last 30 days
- 5
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@fraindz · 265,672
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 11 August 2026
@hfggghjj · 267,534
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 10 August 2026
@pink_letters_0 · 190,620
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 11 August 2026
@sanayemeni · 24,816
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 13 September 2026
@QNQNQP · 28,069
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 8 September 2026
@O_iiiio · 74,331
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 19 August 2026
@Yemen_26_b0t · 24,349
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 14 September 2026
@gsvsvw · 270,179
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 10 August 2026
@HADILBET · 307,154
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 10 August 2026
@meecm · 233,528
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 10 August 2026
@oee_eee · 53,249
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 23 August 2026
@gf2022Unive · 55,708
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 22 August 2026
@ruutrgy · 136,607
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 13 August 2026
@Q8_Q3 · 27,025
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 9 September 2026
@Oneillusion · 132,415
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 13 August 2026
@ahgeelpdf · 28,941
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 9 September 2026
@gf2023Unive · 78,025
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 18 August 2026
@uuuuxcc · 205,892
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 11 August 2026
@Malath_AlroOoh · 200,022
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 11 August 2026
@daoihe · 22,873
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 18 September 2026
@DlI_lD · 55,279
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 24 August 2026
@Words_Men · 115,393
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 14 August 2026
@ma_L7ii · 20,059
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 30 September 2026
@X0_18 · 51,291
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 16 August 2026
This channel appears in 51 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“مَلاذُ التَّائِهِينَ💗.” (@lll_mi13), 10,174 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lll_mi13.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.