Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for LinkedIn по-русски|Евгений Котелевский

Channel

LinkedIn по-русски|Евгений Котелевский

@lnkdnru

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

6,012subscribers

+185 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001836791644
TypeChannel
Username@lnkdnru
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held14
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/lnkdnru

Topic

Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 70% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

5,8276,0375,9327 August 2026 — 5,827 subscribers8 August 2026 — 5,828 subscribers10 August 2026 — 5,857 subscribers13 August 2026 — 5,866 subscribers16 August 2026 — 5,878 subscribers19 August 2026 — 5,904 subscribers23 August 2026 — 5,920 subscribers25 August 2026 — 5,938 subscribers28 August 2026 — 5,955 subscribers31 August 2026 — 5,972 subscribers3 September 2026 — 6,002 subscribers9 September 2026 — 6,037 subscribers12 September 2026 — 6,025 subscribers17 September 2026 — 6,012 subscribers6,0127 August 202617 September 2026
14 measurements spanning 40 days, net +185. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,796–6,069 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 05:206,012-13
12 Sept 2026, 20:186,025-12
9 Sept 2026, 03:366,037+35
3 Sept 2026, 10:056,002+30
31 Aug 2026, 09:475,972+17
28 Aug 2026, 11:445,955+17
25 Aug 2026, 19:355,938+18
23 Aug 2026, 00:145,920+16
19 Aug 2026, 14:345,904+26
16 Aug 2026, 18:475,878+12
13 Aug 2026, 11:485,866+9
10 Aug 2026, 21:255,857+29
8 Aug 2026, 00:405,828+1
7 Aug 2026, 18:165,827first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 20 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 31 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
10s
Average length
10s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

309 reactions across 19 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
13443.4%
👍5919.1%
🔥5818.8%
😁185.83%
😱165.18%
👏61.94%
🫡41.29%
🤔30.971%
💯20.647%
🙏20.647%
🤗20.647%
👌10.324%
👎10.324%
💩10.324%
😢10.324%
🤮10.324%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 309 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 20 May 2026 to 31 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

31 Jul 2026, 06:59 UTC956 views23 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Почему мы отказались от Claude в пользу Hermes + Codex. Весной мы стали использовать RapidAPI LinkedIn Sales Navigator Scraper – через MCP Claude Code должен был сделать запрос к LinkedIn Sales Navigator и выгрузить данные поиска. Мы использовали обычный Claude Code, который работал из-под VS Code. Пару раз Claude Code собрал нужные нам данные, правда токены на $20 тарифе Клода закончились буквально за 10 минут и пр

😁153👍3🔥2

Signed Evgeny Kotelevskiy

30 Jul 2026, 06:49 UTC921 views14 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Posted without readable text

6🔥4💯2🫡2

Signed Evgeny Kotelevskiy

29 Jul 2026, 07:13 UTC837 views6 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Posted without readable text

🔥4👍2

Signed Evgeny Kotelevskiy

28 Jul 2026, 06:36 UTC898 views25 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Пока вы думали, как сделать свой LinkedIn-пост максимально ценным, кто-то опубликовал видео с щеночком, которое набрало 23,067 реакций, 667 комментариев и 1,487 репостов! Это точно соцсеть для бизнеса? #li_content

16🔥7😁2

Signed Evgeny Kotelevskiy

27 Jul 2026, 10:51 UTC992 views6 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Posted without readable text

4🔥1🤗1

Signed Evgeny Kotelevskiy

24 Jul 2026, 06:53 UTC≈1,290 views34 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Posted without readable text

18👍10🔥5😱1

Signed Evgeny Kotelevskiy

20 Jul 2026, 15:54 UTC≈1,560 views10 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Sales Navigator и ИИ-агенты для современного лидгена Sales Navigator – это отдельный платный модуль в LinkedIn, который содержит в себе мини-CRM, кастомные ленты и даже свой внутренний мессенджер. Но главная ценность Sales Nav – это конечно же поиск с 50+ фильтрами (здесь можно почитать разбор по фильтрам и даже посмотреть видео). Sales Nav по задумке Linkedin нельзя экспортировать. Т.е. у Linkedin предусмотрен экс

9👍1

Signed Evgeny Kotelevskiy

17 Jul 2026, 17:07 UTC≈1,530 views26 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Про блокировки на LinkedIn, и как нам всем с этим жить Каждую неделю мне пишут – что делать меня заблокировал Linkedin. У меня было написано несколько гайдов по этому поводу (например, раз и два), но в тему я давно не вникал, так как последняя серьёзная блокировка со мной случилась в 2022 году. В блоге у Димы Батукова (ака Искандера) я читал, что Linkedin перестал принимать российские документы ещё в апреле для ве

👍10😱92🙏2🔥1😁1😢1

Signed Evgeny Kotelevskiy

8 Jul 2026, 15:02 UTC≈1,550 views19 reactionsread 12 August 2026

🙅🏼‍♂️ Кажется, большинство людей до сих пор неправильно понимают, как работает органический LinkedIn. Почему-то многим кажется, что всё дело в КОНТЕНТЕ! Написал пост, попал в рекомендации и сразу собрал лидов. Но если изучить рекомендации лидеров мнений в Linkedin – кого угодно: Justin Welsh, Jasmin Alić, Justin Rowe, Richard Van Der Blom, – они все говорят про ВАЖНОСТЬ КОММЕНТИРОВАНИЯ. Популярный рецепт звучит так

7👍4🔥3🤔3👌1🫡1

Signed Evgeny Kotelevskiy

7 Jul 2026, 15:30 UTC≈1,530 views21 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Телеграм-аутрич – как и чем его делать Отгадайте регион, где: ■ Раздобыть валидных почты ЛПР-людей – это квест со звёздочкой ■ Линкедин либо заблокирован, либо мало распространен ■ Телеграм – это стандарт как для бизнеса, так и личной коммуникации Ответ: СНГ В начале 2026 я провёл вебинар с Глебом Левиным из CRMChat, инструмента для телеграм-аутрича. На ней Глеб открыл для всех нас, сколько всего можно делать в T

11👍6🔥4

Signed Evgeny Kotelevskiy

24 Jun 2026, 15:18 UTC≈1,640 views16 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Эпоха Clay уходит 🚂 Именно такие заголовки мне приходилось видеть последние месяца 3 в Linkedin и на Youtube. И я, конечно, считал, что всё это хайп. Если вы не знаете, то Clay — это такие Google-таблицы на стероидах. По сути Clay — это просто коннектор разных сервисов. Вы можете подрубить туда ваш любимый ИИ, email-базу, телефонную базу и ещё тысячи разных сервисов. К середине 2025 мне стало очевидно, что выпол

9🔥4👍3

Signed Evgeny Kotelevskiy

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @lnkdnru. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“LinkedIn по-русски|Евгений Котелевский” (@lnkdnru), 6,012 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lnkdnru.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.