Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Logical Suite 🎰

Channel

Logical Suite 🎰

@logicalsuite

On this record: Growth Β· Engagement Β· Reactions Β· Posts Β· Citations Β· Cite this entry

2,040subscribers

-112 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002499534572
TypeChannel
Username@logicalsuite
CreatedBetween 1 October 2024 and 31 March 2025 β€” estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live5 September 2026
Measurements held12
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 5 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/logicalsuite

Growth

2,0402,1522,0967 August 2026 β€” 2,152 subscribers7 August 2026 β€” 2,152 subscribers8 August 2026 β€” 2,148 subscribers11 August 2026 β€” 2,140 subscribers14 August 2026 β€” 2,128 subscribers17 August 2026 β€” 2,106 subscribers20 August 2026 β€” 2,098 subscribers23 August 2026 β€” 2,083 subscribers26 August 2026 β€” 2,074 subscribers29 August 2026 β€” 2,065 subscribers1 September 2026 β€” 2,055 subscribers5 September 2026 β€” 2,040 subscribers7 August 20265 September 2026
12 measurements spanning 29 days, net -112. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between β€” snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean β€œno change observed”, never β€œinterpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,023–2,169 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log β€” every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
5 Sept 2026, 21:412,040-15
1 Sept 2026, 12:322,055-10
29 Aug 2026, 22:572,065-9
26 Aug 2026, 15:242,074-9
23 Aug 2026, 23:132,083-15
20 Aug 2026, 13:362,098-8
17 Aug 2026, 16:262,106-22
14 Aug 2026, 01:472,128-12
11 Aug 2026, 01:242,140-8
8 Aug 2026, 05:422,148-4
7 Aug 2026, 16:172,152no change
7 Aug 2026, 16:062,152first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 21 August 2025 β€” the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute β€” we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

217 reactions across 20 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 59.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❀13059.9%
πŸ”₯4018.4%
πŸ†3013.8%
πŸ‘62.76%
πŸŽ‰52.30%
πŸ‘41.84%
🍌20.922%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β€” πŸ™ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β€” so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β€” 4.34K, 1.2M β€” so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post β€” not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β€” those same posts carry 217 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by β€œa reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 21 August 2025 to 1 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

1 Jul 2026, 16:51 UTC137 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Hey

❀7πŸ”₯3

Signed CryptoLogicJohn (Online)

9 Jan 2026, 18:03 UTC498 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Found something interesting

❀11πŸ”₯2

Signed CryptoLogicJohn (Online)

9 Dec 2025, 01:57 UTC691 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026

DsydYLtpthf6aYAjfr16JJ4qJHZN4uHTZrdEmxZTpump

πŸ”₯5πŸ†4❀2

Signed CryptoLogicJohn (Online)

9 Dec 2025, 01:57 UTC680 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Just picked up a bag of $2026. People are starting to connect dots β€” there’s chatter this could shape up as the 2026 token. Pump.Fun has been teasing β€œ2026” nonstop, and the timing isn’t random. Feels like something’s brewing behind the scenes. I’m positioned early. We’ll see how this plays out. CA: DsydYLtpthf6aYAjfr16JJ4qJHZN4uHTZrdEmxZTpump

❀6πŸ†4πŸ”₯2

Signed CryptoLogicJohn (Online)

9 Dec 2025, 01:56 UTC453 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

πŸ†6❀2🍌1

Signed CryptoLogicJohn (Online)

9 Dec 2025, 01:56 UTC417 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Ready?

❀5πŸ”₯4πŸ†2πŸŽ‰1πŸ‘1

Signed CryptoLogicJohn (Online)

9 Dec 2025, 01:49 UTC419 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Been a minute… Back in the trenches. Something just caught my eye. Might be the next runner. Before I say more, I need to see who’s hungry. Show me you’re here to win.

πŸ”₯8πŸ†2❀1πŸŽ‰1

Signed CryptoLogicJohn (Online)

9 Dec 2025, 01:49 UTC366 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Active?

πŸ”₯8πŸ†2

Signed CryptoLogicJohn (Online)

13 Oct 2025, 21:34 UTC531 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Agree with @shmoo β€” the Binance baby narrative has serious potential. πŸ‘ΆπŸ”« Crazy that it’s still under $1M MC right now. China waking up soon… let’s see what happens πŸ˜† πŸ”— https://dexscreener.com/bsc/0x73b63C7b52f427e5F39fdD13383c4Fb9Ab1efFC5

❀8

Signed CryptoLogicJohn (Online)

13 Oct 2025, 21:33 UTC404 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @shmooscasino

I rly fw binance baby ngl Narra just makes sense to me The only bull coin that has been posted by co founder of binance The name is catchy, Mumu rted and commented basically right off launch - which means the team has strong connects there, and mumu went to 800m w same narrative + artist from palu is helping as well and the bull is cute af no kap Ts should be 10m sendor min

❀6

Signed CryptoLogicJohn (Online)

13 Oct 2025, 21:33 UTC339 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @wulfcryptocalls

The only people that were saying it’s over are actual retards and should be unfollowed with haste I tweeted, posted in here, even made a video the day before we rallied back up explaining everything and saying I’m deploying all the capital I have to buy the dip on alts Moments like these test your conviction more than your portfolio. You either trust your read and execute or you let fear make the decision for u I …

❀7

Signed CryptoLogicJohn (Online)

13 Oct 2025, 16:02 UTC320 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026

1M now!

❀9πŸ‘2

Signed CryptoLogicJohn (Online)

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @logicalsuite. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β‰ˆ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β€” t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β‰ˆ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 September 2026 β€” this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

β€œLogical Suite πŸŽ°β€ (@logicalsuite), 2,040 subscribers as measured 5 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/logicalsuite.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.