Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Речевое развитие ребенка в соответствии с ФОП и ФАОП ДОО и ОО

Channel

Речевое развитие ребенка в соответствии с ФОП и ФАОП ДОО и ОО

@logopedfpr

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · Advertising · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

2,390subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 15 September 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001930137749
TypeChannel
Username@logopedfpr
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded15 September 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/logopedfpr

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 18 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Views per post sit far below this size band

12.9 average views per post against 2,390 subscribers — an engagement rate of 0.538%. Across the 1,537 registered channels in the same cohort — 1,000–3,158 subscribers, posting mainly in Russian — the middle half sit between 8.96% and 31.5%, with a median of 17.1%.

What this was computed from
Window30 days (19 August 2026 18 September 2026)
Posts measured20 of 20 published in the window (20 exact, 0 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled257
Mature posts only0.578% over 16 posts read at least 24h after publication
Subscribers2,390 measured 17 September 2026
Cohortb1000:rus · 1,537 channels · p10 4.73% · p25 8.96% · p50 17.1% · p75 31.5% · p90 52.5%
Position in cohort0.586th percentile · 1/32 the cohort median
Uncertainty±0.121% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding
Post languageRussian · 100.0% of the window’s posts

When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or below the 1st percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — below it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.

This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.

Recorded under the key err_low, last confirmed 18 September 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

2,3892,3902,389.515 September 2026 — 2,389 subscribers15 September 2026 — 2,389 subscribers17 September 2026 — 2,390 subscribers15 September 202617 September 2026
3 measurements spanning 2 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,389–2,390 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 13:542,390+1
15 Sept 2026, 14:222,389no change
15 Sept 2026, 13:472,389first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 9 September 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
0.538%
avg views ÷ 2,390 subscribers
Avg views / post
12.8
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
20
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 September 2026
Posts held20 (9 September 202615 September 2026)
Views total257
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken15 Sept 2026, 14:22 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Advertising

Ad load
5.00%
1 of 20 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
1
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
6.0
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
13.0
over 19 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.

Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
eridPostsFirst seenLast seen
2W5zFGnijeZ114 September 202614 September 2026

A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 9 September 2026 to 15 September 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

15 Sept 2026, 13:07 UTC5 viewsread 15 September 2026
Forwarded from @pedagogi_onlinePhoto

Как сегодня выстраивать воспитание личности, если федеральные проекты - «Добрые игры», «Орлята России», «Движение первых» - уже стали частью плана Минпросвещения до 2030 года? У каждого педагога свой ответ. Но есть и общий опыт: Форум «Педагоги России» обобщил практику применения этих проектов в детских садах и школах и собрал её в бесплатный онлайн-интенсив. 🇷🇺Воспитываем личность от малыша до подростка: практики

15 Sept 2026, 10:19 UTC11 viewsread 15 September 2026
Forwarded from @pedagogi_onlinePhoto

Ваши публикации —учитываются при аттестации. При этом имеет значение где именно опубликован материал. В региональных критериях могут предъявляться требования к уровню и статусу издания, в том числе к профильным и официально зарегистрированным СМИ. Наше сетевое издание «ПЕДАГОГИ РОССИИ: ИННОВАЦИИ В ОБРАЗОВАНИИ» официально зарегистрировано как СМИ — ЭЛ № ФС 77-91956 — и является профильным образовательным изданием.

15 Sept 2026, 09:04 UTC8 viewsread 15 September 2026
Forwarded from @pedagogi_onlinePhoto

🔥 Только на два дня открыли бесплатный доступ к курсу «Нейролепка: современные подходы к развитию высших психических функций у детей 3–12 лет» 🏆 По итогам курса участники получат именной диплом на 16 часов и возможность продолжить обучение по 72-часовой программе, соответствующей требованиям Федерального закона № 86-ФЗ и прошедшей экспертизу ИНТЦ «Интеллектуальная электроника — Валдай». 👉 До 17.09 пройти курс беспл

15 Sept 2026, 04:27 UTC12 viewsread 15 September 2026
Forwarded from @pedagogi_onlinePhoto

⚠️ ОДНОГО ПРИКАЗА «НАЗНАЧИТЬ НАСТАВНИКОМ» МАЛО 📌 В Концепции развития наставничества до 2030 года предусмотрено формирование единых подходов к наставничеству и развитие компетенций наставников. 📌 Минпросвещения также направило рекомендации по организации наставничества в сфере труда. Там уже есть ответы на вопросы о том, как выстраивать эту работу, что входит в неё и как её оформлять. — Что конкретно должен делать

14 Sept 2026, 12:36 UTC10 viewsread 15 September 2026
Forwarded from @pedagogi_onlinePhoto

🏆 ПОДГОТОВИТЬСЯ К КОНКУРСУ ЗА ЧАС. ЛЕГКО. 🤖 ЧТО МОЖНО СДЕЛАТЬ ВМЕСТЕ С ИИ? 1️⃣ Сначала дайте нейросети положение о конкурсе и критерии. Попросите простыми словами объяснить, что именно будет оценивать жюри. 2️⃣ Соберите свои материалы: разработки, фотографии, результаты, отзывы, примеры работы. Попросите ИИ помочь определить, что из этого лучше показывает ваш опыт. 3️⃣ Расскажите о своей работе своими словами. Не п

14 Sept 2026, 08:04 UTC6 viewsread 15 September 2026
Advertisementerid 2W5zFGnijeZForwarded from @pedagogi_onlinePhoto

⚡️15 сентября стартует конкурс для учителей начальных классов и учителей-предметников. 🎁 Участие бесплатное, а призов 65: от 1 000 до 10 000 ₽ ! 🏆 Каждый участник получает электронный сертификат. Форматы участия: 👤 Индивидуально. Используйте готовые цифровые материалы из УБ ЦОК: 1️⃣ выберите 3–5 тем, которые сейчас изучаете, повторяете или закрепляете с учениками; 2️⃣ назначьте подходящие цифровые уроки ученикам

14 Sept 2026, 04:09 UTC10 viewsread 15 September 2026
Forwarded from @pedagogi_onlinePhoto

Вы боитесь камеры? Не знаете, с какой стороны подойти к монтажу? Понятия не имеете, как вести официальную страницу школы/детского сада, чтобы не нарушить закон? А дети уже давно снимают ролики, монтируют Reels и общаются в цифре лучше нас. 😰 И вот что нас пугает по-настоящему: мы не знаем, что можно публиковать, а за что оштрафуют; дети уходят в опасные челленджи, а мы не умеем их предупредить; школьный медиацентр —

13 Sept 2026, 12:25 UTC15 viewsread 15 September 2026
Forwarded from @pedagogi_onlinePhoto

📚 Забирайте готовый комплект текстурных карт — технологических карт сенсорных признаков! 👉 https://max.ru/join/eMFc0WHoSU6AL8w2vnMGlEPO4y9qJUnNwzUC7R317Kg 📦 В комплекте: карты «Рельеф», «Осязание», «Материал», «Руки — помощники умной головы», «Влажность», «Температура», «Вес», «Форма» и «Размер», яркие цветные карточки A5 для печати, а также алгоритмы, возрастные ориентиры, конспекты занятий и диагностический лист.

13 Sept 2026, 09:23 UTC15 viewsread 15 September 2026
Forwarded from @pedagogi_onlinePhoto

Каждый педагог при аттестации должен подтвердить наличие своих публикаций в профильных СМИ ! Вы можете опубликовать свои педагогические наработки в зарегистрированном сетевом издании — «ПЕДАГОГИ РОССИИ: ИННОВАЦИИ В ОБРАЗОВАНИИ». Регистрация СМИ: ЭЛ № ФС 77-91956 pedagogi.online Что можно опубликовать: — авторскую методическую разработку; — статью по актуальной педагогической теме; — конспект урока или занятия; — с

13 Sept 2026, 05:14 UTC13 viewsread 15 September 2026
Forwarded from @pedagogi_onlinePhoto

📚 КАК РАБОТАТЬ С ТРУДНОСТЯМИ ЧТЕНИЯ, ЕСЛИ «ПРОСТО ЧИТАТЬ БОЛЬШЕ» НЕ ПОМОГАЕТ? Коллеги, знакомая ситуация: ребёнок прочитал текст, но не может ответить на вопросы, пересказать, выделить главную мысль или понять, что именно нужно найти. Даже если читает быстро и почти без ошибок, смысл может теряться. И вот тут важно понять, где именно возникает трудность: при восприятии, понимании, запоминании или работе с текстом.

12 Sept 2026, 12:24 UTC15 viewsread 15 September 2026
Forwarded from @pedagogi_onlinePhoto

ИНТЕНСИВ ИДЕТ ПОЛНЫМ ХОДОМ! Более 5000 педагогов уже проходят обучение! Переходите в виртуальный зал обучения: https://max.ru/join/Ps7avG49y66GeUh0jLrH3o4QEMEUYtPLj_8m3nj53SU ТОЛЬКО ДО 19 СЕНТЯБРЯ! Участники интенсива могут получить 2 ПЕЧАТНЫХ УПК на бланке ГОЗНАК в одном конверте! Темы в документах: №1: "Современные подходы к трудовому и экологическому воспитанию детей в условиях реализации обновленных ФГОС и Ф

12 Sept 2026, 08:36 UTC14 viewsread 15 September 2026
Forwarded from @pedagogi_onlinePhoto

🤬 ИИ НЕ ПОМОГАЕТ, А ДОБАВЛЯЕТ РАБОТЫ? Коллеги, если после знакомства с ИИ у вас появилось ощущение «что-то он мне совсем не помогает», возможно, дело не в ИИ. 😱 Попросили: «Составь конспект занятия» — получили текст, который проще написать самой. 😨 Попросили придумать задания — половину переделали. 😓 Попросили написать текст для родителей — снова сели и написали всё вручную. Знакомо? 💫 На самом деле нейросеть экон

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @logopedfpr. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Наука - родителям 👨‍👩‍👧‍👦
@roditelmgu · 24,774
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 15 September 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Речевое развитие ребенка в соответствии с ФОП и ФАОП ДОО и ОО” (@logopedfpr), 2,390 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/logopedfpr.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.