Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for logpiar

Channel

logpiar

@logpiar

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1subscribers

-324 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002740062644
TypeChannel
Username@logpiar
CreatedBetween 1 June 2025 and 30 September 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live6 September 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged3 times, most recently 6 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/logpiar

Growth

13251637 August 2026 — 325 subscribers8 August 2026 — 325 subscribers14 August 2026 — 323 subscribers22 August 2026 — 1 subscribers7 August 202622 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 15 days, net -324. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
22 Aug 2026, 12:081-322
14 Aug 2026, 19:08323-2
8 Aug 2026, 07:20325no change
7 Aug 2026, 17:11325first reading

Engagement

14 posts held, back to 13 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 18 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 16s
Average length
19s

Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

87 reactions across 12 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🫡2731.0%
1719.5%
😁1517.2%
custom 58614686949404872931011.5%
👍66.90%
🥰55.75%
custom 528757190926378014733.45%
👎22.30%
😢22.30%

Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 87 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 13 July 2026 to 18 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

18 Jul 2026, 13:54 UTC770 views32 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Так, как и говорил. Чат почищен, а я пошёл. Не знаю, когда возобновлю активность, но явно не скоро. Удачи

🫡21😁63👍1😢1

15 Jul 2026, 07:52 UTC742 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Voice message

Ошибки Артемьевой, как женщины 🍆🥵 #Коммент

5

14 Jul 2026, 19:13 UTC730 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Voice message

Про закон о домашнем насилии Последний рычаг/инструмент парней в семейных ссорах должен быть уничтожен #Коммент

🫡5👍2😢1

14 Jul 2026, 06:00 UTC547 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

В реальности как раз ему донатилки снесли из-за его гонора. И он рил пришёл к украинской донатилке и его послали нахуй, тому що вiн "русня" ебанна #Маргинал

😁4custom 52875719092637801473👍1

14 Jul 2026, 05:49 UTC504 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Сохраню на память молодого Сенатора Жмильстронга #Жмилевский

😁5custom 58614686949404872931

14 Jul 2026, 05:35 UTC431 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Voice message

Переворот фрейма "про лоха" И про силовую аргументацию #Коммент

👍2👎2

Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @logpiar. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“logpiar” (@logpiar), 1 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/logpiar.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.