Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for (کانال انجمن لکنت ایران)

Channel

(کانال انجمن لکنت ایران)

@loknat_org

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,151subscribers

+5 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001107961122
TypeChannel
Username@loknat_org
CreatedBetween 1 February 2017 and 31 October 2019 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 September 2026
Measurements held10
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/loknat_org

Growth

1,1451,1511,1486 August 2026 — 1,146 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,146 subscribers14 August 2026 — 1,148 subscribers17 August 2026 — 1,147 subscribers20 August 2026 — 1,145 subscribers23 August 2026 — 1,147 subscribers25 August 2026 — 1,146 subscribers31 August 2026 — 1,150 subscribers4 September 2026 — 1,149 subscribers10 September 2026 — 1,151 subscribers6 August 202610 September 2026
10 measurements spanning 34 days, net +5. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,144–1,152 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Sept 2026, 03:391,151+2
4 Sept 2026, 11:161,149-1
31 Aug 2026, 16:251,150+4
25 Aug 2026, 21:371,146-1
23 Aug 2026, 02:261,147+2
20 Aug 2026, 01:321,145-2
17 Aug 2026, 11:581,147-1
14 Aug 2026, 00:081,148+2
6 Aug 2026, 18:301,146no change
6 Aug 2026, 18:201,146first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 2 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

100 reactions across 18 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👏4343.0%
👍3131.0%
2626.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 100 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 2 July 2026 to 2 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

2 Aug 2026, 19:23 UTC268 views8 reactionsread 6 August 2026

سوال یکی از اعضا و پاسخ اقای امیر حسین رسولی (گفتاردرمان و دانشجوی دکترا در دانشگاه ایالتی میشیگان آمریکا) : سلام به همگی من با افزایش سن متوجه شدم که لکنتم داره بیشتر میشه الان ۴۴ سالمه و تحت درمان هم نیستم واسه شما هم همینطور بوده؟ سلام و وقت بخیر سوالتون خیلی خوبه و راستش بین بزرگسالان دارای لکنت هم خیلی رایجه. اولین چیزی که از دید پژوهشی باید بگم اینه که لکنت با بالا رفتن سن از بین نمیره، ولی به معنای وا

8

31 Jul 2026, 17:45 UTC209 views6 reactionsread 6 August 2026

سلام و احترام خدمت دوستان محترم 🌹🌹 جلسه انجمن جمعه مورخ ۱۴۰۵/۰۵/۰۹ حاضرین جلسه: آقایان :محمد زاده_هاشمی_گلشناس_خواجه وند_شریفی فر جلسه امروز با رو خوانی از روی نمایش نامه آغاز شد، در ادامه صحبت شد که در جلسات آینده با هماهنگی و همکاری دوستان تمرین نمایش نامه خوانی داشته باشیم . برای اینکه فضای متفاوتی تجربه کنیم، تمرین رو با صندلی داغ (پرسش و پاسخ) ادامه دادیم . سوالات چالشی دوستان باعث شد تمرین متفاوتی را تجربه ک

👍3👏3

31 Jul 2026, 17:42 UTC196 views5 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

9 مرداد 1405 #جلسات_پارک_ساعی @loknat_org

3👍2

29 Jul 2026, 03:38 UTC249 views5 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

6 مردادماه 1405 #جلسات_کنفرانس_روش #انجمن_لکنت_تهران @loknat_org

👍5

29 Jul 2026, 03:37 UTC239 views5 reactionsread 6 August 2026

جلسه کنفرانس روش مورخ ۱۴۰۵/۵/۶ حاضرین در جلسه : خانم اسلامی آقایان : خجسته فر، هاشمی، معانی، پوریا محمدزاده، شریفی، گل شناس، غفاری، محمدزاده بعد از حدود ۹ ماه، جلسه کنفرانس روش دیگری در کلاس ۱۰۳ فرهنگسرا برگزار شد. چند نفر از دوستان ارائه داشتند و بقیه به سؤال‌هایی در زمینه‌های مختلف پاسخ دادند. پوریا: آوازخوانی دلنشین، متین آقای گل شناس: پایبندی کامل به اجرای شیوه‌ها آقای شریفی: مسلط در ارائه، دقیق خانم اسلامی: پ

👍41

25 Jul 2026, 17:46 UTC302 views8 reactionsread 6 August 2026

گزارش جلسه پارک ساعی مورخ ۱۴۰۵/۵/۲ با حضور: خانم ها :باقریان-آزادی-مهسا-آشتیانی اقایان:بهنام محمدزاده-امینی-اکبری-هاشمی-برادران امامی نژاد-زینلی-شریفی فر-صفا-کریم ابادی-احمدی-گلشناس-پوریا محمدزاده-خواجه وند شروع جلسه با معرفی اغاز شد و از هفته ای که گذشت صحبت کردیم که اکثر دوستان هفته پر چالش و نسبتا سختی داشتن،ولی چیزی که حائز اهمیت بود این بود که از پس چالش هایی که باهاشون مواجه شده بودیم،بر اومده بودیم. موضوع

👏6👍2

25 Jul 2026, 17:44 UTC197 views7 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

دوم مرداد ۱۴۰۵ #جلسات_پارک_ساعی @loknat_org

👏5👍2

25 Jul 2026, 17:15 UTC222 views8 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

برنامه صبحانه ۱۴۰۵/۵/۲ #جلسات_پارک_ساعی #انجمن_لکنت_تهران @loknat_org

5👍2👏1

22 Jul 2026, 20:00 UTC265 views2 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

30 تیرماه 1405 #جلسات_کنفرانس_روش @loknat_org

👏2

22 Jul 2026, 19:59 UTC232 views3 reactionsread 6 August 2026

گزارش کوتاه از جلسه کنفرانس روش ، ۳۰/۴/۱۴۰۵ جلسه با حضور شش نفر از دوستان برگزار شد: آقایان: فواد، سجاد، آقای معانی، بهنام، شایراد ، سهراب. جلسه خیلی خوب و پرانرژی بود. البته تقریباً نیم ساعت اول برق نداشتیم 😄 فواد گفت نمی‌شه ، من هم یه شعر از هیچکس براش خوندم و گفتم ، یعنی چی نمی‌شه ، ما ادامه داریم 😁 خلاصه اینکه تاریکی نتونست جلوی ما رو بگیره و هر کدوم از دوستان، به سبک و شیوه خودش، ارائه‌اش رو انجام داد. بیشتر

👏21

17 Jul 2026, 16:52 UTC330 views10 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

26 تیرماه 1405 #جلسات_پارک_ساعی @loknat_org

6👍2👏2

17 Jul 2026, 16:46 UTC275 views5 reactionsread 6 August 2026

جلسه گروهی پارک ساعی مورخ ۱۴۰۵/۴/۲۶ حاضرین در جلسه خانم ها : آزادی، آشتیانی آقایان : هاشمی، امینی، امامی نژاد، سامان، گل شناس، یاسین، محمدزاده جلسه را با معرفی و مرور شیوه‌های گفتاری‌مون شروع کردیم. بعد از صحبت ها، دو موضوع برای گفت و گو ها مطرح شد، چطور در شرایط بحرانی، مثل جنگ یا سایر بحران ها، از «روال معمول زندگی‌مان» خارج نشویم؟ به این نتیجه رسیدیم که ایجاد و انجام کارهای کوچک و ساده، بهترین راهکار است و با ای

👏3👍2

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @loknat_org. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“(کانال انجمن لکنت ایران)” (@loknat_org), 1,151 subscribers as measured 10 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/loknat_org.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.