📱 у меня нету особо настроения, но САБИНСК это САБИНСК, играю квалы🏆 (no mic no cam) https://www.twitch.tv/loodl0w https://www.twitch.tv/loodl0w https://www.twitch.tv/loodl0w
❤20💘2❤🔥1🔥1

Channel
@loodlow
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
617subscribers
-15 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002551952840 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @loodlow |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 10 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/loodlow |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Sept 2026, 20:19 | 617 | -3 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 15:16 | 620 | -5 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 04:45 | 625 | -6 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 12:38 | 631 | -1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 03:21 | 632 | no change |
| 9 Aug 2026, 19:17 | 632 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 7 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 28 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
647 reactions across 19 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 341 | 52.7% | |
| ❤🔥 | 142 | 21.9% | |
| 🔥 | 51 | 7.88% | |
| 😭 | 41 | 6.34% | |
| 💘 | 38 | 5.87% | |
| ⚡ | 11 | 1.70% | |
| 🥰 | 8 | 1.24% | |
| 😢 | 7 | 1.08% | |
| 💋 | 3 | 0.464% | |
| 🤬 | 3 | 0.464% | |
| 💩 | 1 | 0.155% | |
| 🗿 | 1 | 0.155% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 647 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 7 July 2026 to 28 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @loodlow. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 7 July 2026 to 28 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
📱 у меня нету особо настроения, но САБИНСК это САБИНСК, играю квалы🏆 (no mic no cam) https://www.twitch.tv/loodl0w https://www.twitch.tv/loodl0w https://www.twitch.tv/loodl0w
❤20💘2❤🔥1🔥1
Бля этот "какой-то бездарь" (skycrab 🇳🇴) поставил НОВЫЙ МИРОВОЙ РЕКОРД 6:39 🙂 Работала бы у меня ебаная оперативка я бы уже давно нагриндил на вр, такой тильт
❤🔥30💘3🔥2❤1
📱 стрим с малым #2 (короткий) RANKED🏆 стрим малым😒... Эло: 2130 (#43) 🟪 https://www.twitch.tv/loodl0w https://www.twitch.tv/loodl0w https://www.twitch.tv/loodl0w
❤13💘1
📱 Я притащил тяжёлую артиллерию (Darthloll) который поможет мне понять почему я сосу, RANKED🏆 P.S. завтра стрим с малым😒... Эло: 2076 (#57) 🟪 https://www.twitch.tv/loodl0w https://www.twitch.tv/loodl0w https://www.twitch.tv/loodl0w
❤🔥15❤3💘1
Я кстати подал заявку на турик SABINSK #2 , короче это дерби между снг ребятами 👯♀ (плейофф для нас 10го, вроде то опечатка) P.S. кто не помнит что было в первом сабинске, напоминаю одним скрином👻
❤18❤🔥2💘1
ВОТ ТАК Я ПЕРЕПУГАЛСЯ БЛЯТЬ😒 чуть какой-то бездарь не обогнал меня в топе, мой пб 7:11.350, его 7:11.628
❤43❤🔥7💘1
📱 Да я обещал стрим в 19, но у меня гости, они не уходят, ладно, значит RANKED🏆 стрим с пиздюком 🤡 на будущее, это была ошибка 😒 Эло: 2097 (#47) 🟪 https://www.twitch.tv/loodl0w https://www.twitch.tv/loodl0w https://www.twitch.tv/loodl0w
⚡9💘2❤1
📱 Пора возвращать RANKED🏆 форму, сори что так поздно, только свет дали 🫣 P.S. если сегодня это вчерашнее завтра, то завтра будет вчерашним сегодня.. так ?😕 Эло: 2120 (#42) 🟪 https://www.twitch.tv/loodl0w https://www.twitch.tv/loodl0w https://www.twitch.tv/loodl0w
❤13❤🔥1💘1
Они проиграли Бразилии в полуфинале 0-4 БЛЯТЬ 0-4 ПИЗДЕЦ ДА УЖ КОГО Я В ПОЛУФИНАЛ ПРОТАЩИЛ ✨
🔥37❤7🤬3😢2❤🔥1💘1💩1
🏆 Должен сегодня играть полуфинал того самого турика стран но... все 3 матча я выступал как замена, не смотря на то, что я в соло провёл в полуфинал закерив тиму, теперь мне некого заменять, ведь все у них в сборе.. нет слов, вроде тильт, вроде похуй 👋
😭41😢5❤4💘1
Не знаю как, но придя домой вижу как это чудо каким-то способом надел на себя лепестки каких-то цветов. Косит под милашку? 😳
❤54❤🔥4💘4🥰1
Кстати, делая превью случайно выбрал цвет на палитре #676767 🤪 P.S пиздец осуждаю, но с этим цветом и сделал xdd
❤🔥21💘4⚡2💋2🗿1
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @loodlow. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Баня Луда” (@loodlow), 617 subscribers as measured 10 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/loodlow.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.