Ecommerce storefront — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
51 measurements spanning 89 days, net +336. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 12,401–12,849 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 51
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
4 Nov 2026, 10:46
12,797
+8
3 Nov 2026, 07:48
12,789
+1
2 Nov 2026, 05:07
12,788
+5
1 Nov 2026, 01:20
12,783
+2
31 Oct 2026, 04:41
12,781
+4
30 Oct 2026, 07:28
12,777
-1
29 Oct 2026, 08:48
12,778
+10
28 Oct 2026, 03:36
12,768
+25
27 Oct 2026, 01:47
12,743
-1
24 Oct 2026, 19:06
12,744
-2
23 Oct 2026, 16:00
12,746
-2
22 Oct 2026, 13:46
12,748
+4
21 Oct 2026, 05:20
12,744
+7
20 Oct 2026, 00:34
12,737
-6
18 Oct 2026, 20:56
12,743
+10
17 Oct 2026, 19:18
12,733
-3
16 Oct 2026, 15:48
12,736
-3
15 Oct 2026, 15:27
12,739
+3
14 Oct 2026, 17:31
12,736
+8
13 Oct 2026, 07:15
12,728
first reading
Engagement
17 posts held, back to 5 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 51 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
171.5%
avg views ÷ 12,797 subscribers
Avg views / post
22,000
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.134%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 17 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 October 2026
Posts held
17 (5 July 2026 – 27 October 2026)
Views total
43,900
Reactions total
59
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
4 Nov 2026, 18:09 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
694
Videos
111
Links
185
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 4 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
3m 51s
Average length
18s
Measured directly from 13 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
499 reactions across 17 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 76.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
383
76.8%
🔥
49
9.82%
👍
44
8.82%
❤🔥
22
4.41%
🐳
1
0.2%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 499 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 5 July 2026 to 27 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Advertising
Ad load
94.1%
16 of 17 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
16
posts carrying an erid · 16 distinct tokens
Median views · ads
21,200
over 16 measured posts
Median views · rest
16,300
over 1 measured post
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
erid
Posts
First seen
Last seen
2SDnjcSsnR9
1
11 September 2026
11 September 2026
2SDnjcaBL4s
1
4 September 2026
4 September 2026
2SDnjcbhFba
1
18 October 2026
18 October 2026
2SDnjd8eQTt
1
5 July 2026
5 July 2026
2SDnjdX5yhU
1
6 July 2026
6 July 2026
2SDnjdcuRkX
1
13 August 2026
13 August 2026
2SDnjdiWbS3
1
29 August 2026
29 August 2026
2SDnjdoYRLf
1
16 July 2026
16 July 2026
2SDnjdsrPCo
1
30 August 2026
30 August 2026
2SDnje4K24T
1
11 September 2026
11 September 2026
2SDnje8Lits
1
21 July 2026
21 July 2026
2SDnjeHez1Y
1
8 July 2026
8 July 2026
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it. 4 further tokens are held for this entry and not listed here.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 5 July 2026 to 27 October 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 2 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
СУМКА в стиле Furla Iride S Crossbody
уже показывала такую в цвете фуксия (и она сейчас даже в наличии по ссылке из этого же поста), а теперь решила приобрести в глубоком серо-коричневом оттенке
оригинал на Lamoda нашла за 35.5 тысяч рублей, вариант с АЕ обошелся мне в 7.885 рублей 👌🏻
много раз говорила, что не вижу смысла покупать оригиналы Furla за полную стоимость (при том, что у меня в коллекции они есть 😅)
п…
СУМКА в стиле Coach Teri Shoulder Bag in blue denim
на мой взгляд все сумки Coach у этого продавца отличные!
у меня была возможность пощупать оригиналы (другие модели), желания купить не возникло, не вижу ощутимой разницы (та же ситуация с Furla)
единственное, что меня зацепило это «pillow»-модели, их и в копиях не видно: я бы рассмотрела к покупке за фулпрайс ❤️
ну а сегодня об этой крутейшей малышке!
оригинал…
СУМКА в стиле Tory Burch Mini T
вызвала очень много вопросов после этого обзора — спешу поделиться!
оригинал стоит приблизительно $370 или 32 тысячи рублей, вариант с АЕ можно приобрести за 9.100 рублей
сумка отличная! ❤️
сделана качественно, пришла в фирменном пыльнике, все бирки на месте
не тряпочка, дрежит форму и смотрится достойно, но для нее, конечно, необходим органайзер 😅
❤️ ссылка
P.S. ссылка скрытая:…
СУМКА в стиле Loewe Puzzle
ну очень классная! ❤️
одна такая у меня уже есть в базовом коричневом, но перед желтой устоять я просто не смогла
яркая, дофаминовая — то, что нужно тоскливой серой осенью 👍🏻
пришла в фирменной коробке и пыльнике, вся фурнитура была надежно заклеена
по качеству исполнения никаких нареканий, 10 из 10 ❤️
уже успела выгулять и даже в отпуск с собой взяла, так сильно она мне понравилась 👌…
РЕМЕНЬ в стиле Vivienne от Celine
отличный базовый вариант 👍🏻
оригинальный ремень на официальном сайте Celine стоит ~48.5 тысяч рублей, модель с АЕ — 4.365 рублей
да, по материалу уступает: аналог выполнен из кожзама, а оригинал — из натуральной кожи
но я все равно им довольна!
пришел в фирменной коробке, упакован был надежно, все пряжки были заклеены
кстати, по цвету практически идеально совпадает с сумкой из …
СУМКА в стиле Tangle Small от Jil Sander
оригинал нашла на сайте ЦУМа за 75+ тысяч рублей, в то время как аналог с АЕ обошелся мне в 5.360 рублей 👌🏻
да, оригинал выполнен из натуральной кожи, эта же модель из кожзама, но у меня никаких нареканий нет
качественная хорошая сумка, аккуратная форма ❤️
кстати, такую я очень люблю — в моем рейтинге она сразу на втором месте, после средних на длинном и коротком ремне
❤️…
CУМКА в стиле Louis Vuitton Odyssee MM
тот редкий случай, когда этому продавцу максимально удалась реплика LV ❤️
по качеству ничем не уступает NéoNoé, которая настолько мне полюбилась, что я ношу ее регулярно!
мне кажется, исполнение очень и очень достойное, с виду так и не скажешь, что это копия
пришла в фирменной коробке, упаковка 10/10, все бирки и лого на месте 👍🏻
❤️ ссылка
P.S. ссылка скрытая: продажа копи…
БОМБЕР в стиле Adidas Chinese New Year Jacket
а вот и обещанный обзор на эту куртку!
хитовала весь прошлый год, но я решилась на покупку только в этом 😅
оригинал стоил $180 или ~15.500 рублей (на официальном сайте уже недоступен), а вариант с АЕ стоит в два раза дешевле
очень достойный аналог: куртка тяжелая, добротная, я уже ее несколько раз выгуливала и осталась довольна ❤️
по ссылке большой выбор цветов (оста…
КРОССОВКИ в стиле Miu Miu
аналог модели Tyre Nylon Sport ❤️
пришли в фирменной коробке, со всеми бирками и лого
кожа, как мне кажется, искусственная, а вот замша очень похожа на натуральную 👍🏻
а этот цвет, ну просто песня!
на осень сложно представить вариант лучше 👌🏻
у меня 39 размер, подошел отлично
да, не самая бюджетная реплика, но оригинал стоит ~170 тысяч рублей
❤️ кроссовки
P.S. ссылка скрытая: продажа …
СУМКА И КЕПКА в стиле Miu Miu
а вот и обещанный мной обзор — знаю, многие ждали его с нетерпением!
кепка очень симпатичная: классное сочетание цветов, для лучков с преппи-вайбом супер вариант
сумка вообще во все мои образы подходит 👌🏻
я поняла для себя, что моя идеальная форма — это средний размер + короткая ручка + длинный ремешок
если руки свободны, можно взять и нести в руке/на руке, если мне нужны руки — мож…
🔔 НОВЫЕ ССЫЛКИ: часть 2
или — моя коллекция кроссовок!
уверена, ссылки на них ждали многие ❤️
для меня самыми удобными остаются Gazelle во всех вариациях, но и остальные пары с удовольствием ношу 👌🏻
❤ ОБЗОРЫ ждут вас ЗДЕСЬ: SL 72 OG W • Samba OG • Mexico 66 • Samba желтые с голубыми полосками • Gazelle Indoor Almost Pink Gum • Samba Cardboard • Spezial • Samba Preloved Ruby
❤ а ССЫЛКИ на все ЗДЕСЬ: раз • два • т…
🔔 НОВЫЕ ССЫЛКИ: часть 1
собрала все-все запросы за последнее время — и на все, что сейчас в наличии, продавец поделился новыми ссылочками ❤
не все интересующие вас позиции на данный момент доступны, но, тем не менее, посмотреть есть на что!
тем более, что в наличии появились сумочки Furla, которых не было очень давно ❤️
пришлось даже разделить пост на две части — в одну все ссылки просто не поместились 😅
❤ ОБЗО…
❤34
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @lookalike_aliexpress. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“LOOK-A-LIKE Aliexpress” (@lookalike_aliexpress), 12,797 subscribers as measured 4 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lookalike_aliexpress.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.